Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
32. Columbia Professor of the University: ''Hillary is the candidate of the war machine.''
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:18 AM
Jun 2016


Words of wisdom:



Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine

by Jeffrey D. Sachs
Common Dreams, Feb. 5, 2016

There's no doubt that Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street. Even more dangerous, though, is that she is the candidate of the military-industrial complex. The idea that she is bad on the corporate issues but good on national security has it wrong. Her so-called foreign policy "experience" has been to support every war demanded by the US deep security state run by the military and the CIA.

Hillary and Bill Clinton's close relations with Wall Street helped to stoke two financial bubbles (1999-2000 and 2005-8) and the Great Recession that followed Lehman's collapse. In the 1990s they pushed financial deregulation for their campaign backers that in turn let loose the worst demons of financial manipulation, toxic assets, financial fraud, and eventually collapse. In the process they won elections and got mighty rich.

Yet Hillary's connections with the military-industrial complex are also alarming. It is often believed that the Republicans are the neocons and the Democrats act as restraints on the warmongering. This is not correct. Both parties are divided between neocon hawks and cautious realists who don't want the US in unending war. Hillary is a staunch neocon whose record of favoring American war adventures explains much of our current security danger.

SNIP...

Hillary's record as Secretary of State is among the most militaristic, and disastrous, of modern US history. Some experience. Hilary was a staunch defender of the military-industrial-intelligence complex at every turn, helping to spread the Iraq mayhem over a swath of violence that now stretches from Mali to Afghanistan. Two disasters loom largest: Libya and Syria.

Hillary has been much attacked for the deaths of US diplomats in Benghazi, but her tireless promotion of the overthrow Muammar Qaddafi by NATO bombing is the far graver disaster. Hillary strongly promoted NATO-led regime change in Libya, not only in violation of international law but counter to the most basic good judgment. After the NATO bombing, Libya descended into civil war while the paramilitaries and unsecured arms stashes in Libya quickly spread west across the African Sahel and east to Syria. The Libyan disaster has spawned war in Mali, fed weapons to Boko Haram in Nigeria, and fueled ISIS in Syria and Iraq. In the meantime, Hillary found it hilarious to declare of Qaddafi: "We came, we saw, he died."

CONTINUED w/links...

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/02/05/hillary-candidate-war-machine


Wars without end. Amen.
HA! nt Jitter65 Jun 2016 #1
Columbia Professor of the University: ''Hillary is the candidate of the war machine.'' Octafish Jun 2016 #32
Hillary Clearly Is A FERVENT PROPONENT OF AMERICAN "EXCEPTIONALISM!" Very Republicanesque? CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #43
and she still has the support of democrats noiretextatique Jun 2016 #52
Not this Democrat. EndElectoral Jun 2016 #55
Obviously a victory sign and not a peace sign? Get.Real.Now Jun 2016 #64
Get 'em in while you still can...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #2
Tick, tock, tick, tock..... George II Jun 2016 #21
You would have Professor Sachs censored at DU as from what date, Sid? Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #31
Sid is Canadian and does not vote in our elections. n/t Matt_R Jun 2016 #60
lol.. disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #67
Correct me if I'm wrong. Matt_R Jun 2016 #68
Our country needs drastic change. SamKnause Jun 2016 #3
Her foreign policy speech was excellent. She pointed out what a loose cannon Trump would be. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #4
Sanders was not a conscientious objector. He applied, never got it. Ali went to jail for objecting. merrily Jun 2016 #5
They are free to take that stand. I didn't question that. But, that disqualifies them from being the Trust Buster Jun 2016 #7
I'd rather a CIC who took a moral stand against a war than one who advocated for an immoral war. merrily Jun 2016 #9
Sometimes war is unavoidable as was the case after 911. No place for a conscientious objector Trust Buster Jun 2016 #11
Bull puckies. The Iraq war, like the Vietnam War, was eminently avoidable. merrily Jun 2016 #13
The direct result of 911 was the war in Afghanistan. A sloppy dodge on your part. That is an Trust Buster Jun 2016 #20
Sanders had no moral objection to the Afghanistan War. He voted for it. So, I have no clue merrily Jun 2016 #24
He was a conscientious objector and, therefore, unfit to be Commander in Chief. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #25
Lol, say it over and over. Still isn't true and makes you look like a bot Arazi Jun 2016 #39
Both parts of your statement are false and you know that very well at least as to the first merrily Jun 2016 #46
A Hillary supporter. bvar22 Jun 2016 #59
By definition a conscientious objector opposes ALL war, not just a specific one. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #33
Bernie has said it was the Vietnam War, not all wars. merrily Jun 2016 #34
In that case, he's very lucky to have not been drafted. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #35
Again, do you know what the statuory definition was during the Vietnam era? merrily Jun 2016 #37
Of course he objected to the Vietnam war...he was WhiteTara Jun 2016 #41
Um, no. He was not being drafted. He was never drafted. And most people agree that the merrily Jun 2016 #45
He had a draft number and when his CO appeals were finally WhiteTara Jun 2016 #50
I don't know if he had a draft number or not and neither do you. You don't know if he appealed, merrily Jun 2016 #66
Where in the Constitution does it say a CO status prohibits one for being President? EndElectoral Jun 2016 #58
Getting a student deferment is so much more aceptable than being a conscientious objector Autumn Jun 2016 #17
Some Presidents deserted and/or dodged the draft behind scenes. merrily Jun 2016 #19
Clinton made every effort to avoid the draft, got a deferment and I respected him on that. Autumn Jun 2016 #22
In my personal opinion, someone who took a public stand against an immoral war, merrily Jun 2016 #27
My opinion also. Autumn Jun 2016 #28
Ali was for arrested failing to register or be inducted I believe. EndElectoral Jun 2016 #57
I don't know and I don't feel like googling. I just hope a man of conviction is resting in peace. merrily Jun 2016 #65
The PNAC Candidate. Scuba Jun 2016 #6
I don't think it's possible for the Huffington Post to embarrass itself any further. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #8
God forbid there were a few media stories that did not tear down Sanders. The horror! merrily Jun 2016 #10
You don't have to "tear down Sanders" to report the truth. HP made a choice to lie in support BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #12
Many media outlets online and in RL have discredited themselves on behalf of Hillary. merrily Jun 2016 #14
BobbyDrake—Hillary loves war! The neocons agree with her. CobaltBlue Jun 2016 #26
Why don't you attack Jeffrey Sachs directly? He's the author. reformist2 Jun 2016 #36
Jeffrey Sachs was the guy who told Bernie it was a good use of $500,000 to go to Rome? brooklynite Jun 2016 #15
Jeffrey who? Oh, yeah, that guy who set up the "Roman Holiday" Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #16
See #31. n/t Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #48
Well said Jeffrey Sachs. nt. icecreamfan Jun 2016 #18
Going out of business sale!!! All outrages MUST GO!!!! JoePhilly Jun 2016 #23
What a bunch of fucking nonsense. When are you going to call out Bernie BootinUp Jun 2016 #29
Cannot rec this enough. Nyan Jun 2016 #30
Endless war, corporate sacking of the working class... 99Forever Jun 2016 #38
Yup, right on Arazi Jun 2016 #40
But...but...didn't you see all those flags behind her??? K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #42
Darkest of History Ahead Octafish Jun 2016 #47
K N R-ed Faux pas Jun 2016 #44
Democrat means nothing anymore noiretextatique Jun 2016 #49
The Numbers jamese777 Jun 2016 #51
Only proving how easily people can be deceived. Duppers Jun 2016 #56
HRC should not use the words "trust me". Ever. stillwaiting Jun 2016 #53
Recommended and Kicked to the Max!! Duppers Jun 2016 #54
K&R JEB Jun 2016 #61
Thank you Jeffrey....'tis TRUE! KoKo Jun 2016 #62
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton’s Speech Shows th...»Reply #32