Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
2. I don't think she's making the argument for new Superdelegates at all...
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:26 AM
Jun 2016

...she's certainly in touch with existing supporters, but she doesn't need MORE (after Tuesday), and it's time for her to move on the General Election.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8) she's the only candidate with a morally legitimate claim on the nomination; geek tragedy Jun 2016 #1
I thought that's why there were superdelegates? Reiyuki Jun 2016 #10
"if they ended up choosing wrong." geek tragedy Jun 2016 #11
No. That's not why there are super delegates onenote Jun 2016 #30
Supers could technically select Bernie and override millions of Clinton voters. You OK with that? Reiyuki Jun 2016 #33
My post wasn't a defense of supers, it was an explanation onenote Jun 2016 #34
sorry then, not meant as personal attack Reiyuki Jun 2016 #35
I don't think she's making the argument for new Superdelegates at all... brooklynite Jun 2016 #2
I think it would be irresponsible if she weren't. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #6
at this point, she's telling them to keep their endorsement under wraps geek tragedy Jun 2016 #12
Interesting. Thanks. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #15
According to the news outlets Trenzalore Jun 2016 #38
#6 this one is the kicker ain't it? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #3
The super D's are party people Peacetrain Jun 2016 #4
Thank you. underthematrix Jun 2016 #5
Very well said. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #7
It depends on the purpose of the superdelegates. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #8
The indictment fairy is going to come, no matter how hard you clap your hands. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #13
Superdelegates are sane, and no sane person thinks she will be indicted. YouDig Jun 2016 #14
Of course she does. Sanders will not flip one superdelegate sufrommich Jun 2016 #9
The super delegates will vote for the strongest general election candidate-Hillary Clinton Gothmog Jun 2016 #16
And I have a better argument for Super Delegates to vote for Bernie RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #17
I think that is about all they have to go with. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #18
So the "will of the voters" is to lose the election to Drumpf? RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #20
When was that voted on? Nt NCTraveler Jun 2016 #25
Not voted, but reality. RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #29
Wait. An election not being held for five months is so certain it should decide the nominee onenote Jun 2016 #31
I hope you really can see the glaring error in your response. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #36
Even if you lose the women and PoC who will see their votes being dismissed to give it to lunamagica Jun 2016 #19
I think HRC will vote for any Democratic in the the GE. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #21
She will, but don't count on the people who have fought so hard to vote, just to have their votes lunamagica Jun 2016 #24
Correction. None of the super delegates are pledged. They are all free agents until they vote. imagine2015 Jun 2016 #22
You know what's meaningless? GE polls five months before the election onenote Jun 2016 #32
Sounds good. I hold that same position for Sanders rallies. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #37
I think #6 and #7 have been the primary motivators fo SDs -esp the 400 who declared before any votes aikoaiko Jun 2016 #23
Or the real reason. basselope Jun 2016 #26
#7 Nt NCTraveler Jun 2016 #27
Top argument...sanders be destroyed by media and gop beachbumbob Jun 2016 #28
We had a primary process Trenzalore Jun 2016 #39
That's what a candidate should do. Orsino Jun 2016 #40
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I believe Clinton has a b...»Reply #2