Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demsrule86

(68,352 posts)
50. she won
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:21 AM
Jun 2016

She has the most delegates which is how we always select our candidates...the entitled person is Bernie...who wants supers to select him even though he lost.

All Bernie has now is an argument that we need to steal an election to save democracy. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #1
I can almost hear him, "In order to save Democracy, we had to burn it to the ground." Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #4
That was already done about 30 years ago Armstead Jun 2016 #25
Like Grover Norquist, who wants to deprive funds (taxes) from the government question everything Jun 2016 #32
Norquist waned to drown government in a bathtub. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #34
Bernie can talk the talk, we'll know this week whether he's willing to walk the walk, i.e. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #2
A revolution against the party elite that asks the party elite to overthrow the will of the voters.. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #3
The "will of the voters" as indicated by a corrupt election system. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #7
The will of the majority of the voters as defined by votes cast by voters. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #8
It is well know around the world that our election system is the worst of all modern rhett o rick Jun 2016 #10
Yet, somehow, the will of the voters is still heard. The elites should not coronate Sanders. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #12
What an ironic thing to say, "The elites should not coronate Sanders." rhett o rick Jun 2016 #14
His call to super-delegates to anoint him is his call to the elite. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #15
He is calling for the Super-Delegates to make this corrupted election right. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #17
He calls it a corrupted election because he has lost. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #18
I prefer to fight Republicans but that is just me. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #13
Bernie is "entitled"? Pure projection. The Clinton followers didn't even want a primary because rhett o rick Jun 2016 #16
she won Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #50
No, it isn't. You're just totally wrong about that. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #23
Sorry but I am not drinking whatever you are. There were a lot of manipulations that occurred in rhett o rick Jun 2016 #27
You've just moved the goalposts. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #48
You've got a lot to say about the world's belief but what do you believe? rhett o rick Jun 2016 #52
I would say that America's elections are within the top 30% worldwide by most measures. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #53
That's not even remotely true Recursion Jun 2016 #49
You argument seems to be, .... Steal the votes that were stolen from us. seabeyond Jun 2016 #22
Corrupt enough to skew the vote by 3 million votes? Feathery Scout Jun 2016 #26
3 million votes is a lie. You leave out the states that used the caucus system. But you know that. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #29
Yep GulfCoast66 Jun 2016 #40
If this is a "corrupt" election system then why are you fighting to be a part of it? question everything Jun 2016 #33
Tea party was not a 3rd party TimPlo Jun 2016 #35
No, they are not. But they certainly influenced Congress and these elections question everything Jun 2016 #36
K & R BootinUp Jun 2016 #5
Another mouthpiece for Clinton has spouted a campaign talking point. And it totally false. A lie. imagine2015 Jun 2016 #6
once you know someone will lie to you reddread Jun 2016 #11
It's not a campaign talking point. It's a fact. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #19
LOL, Long time Obama advisor, David Axelrod is no Hillary shill MadBadger Jun 2016 #20
Yes he is. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #30
Sanders and his supporters are angry the people have stolen his nomination. stevenleser Jun 2016 #9
After referring to them as the establishment and oligarchy. You just can't make this chit up. grossproffit Jun 2016 #28
why is david axelrod shilling for hillary? hopemountain Jun 2016 #21
Because she is the Democratic nominee. Axelrod is a Democrat. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #24
Lies, lies and more lies. She is not the nominee and he is a pathetic Democrat. But then rhett o rick Jun 2016 #31
Don't expect other people to share in your silly denial. She is the nominee. stevenleser Jun 2016 #39
LOL. You aren't worth my time and I am not sure why I failed to put you on ignore. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #42
Common sense and math are biased in favor of Hillary. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #37
thank you, geek tragedy. nt hopemountain Jun 2016 #41
We will fight on against those that have brought us 2.5 million homeless American children and rhett o rick Jun 2016 #43
Face it, your guy lost. Beacool Jun 2016 #45
Gloat if you will but your candidate supports those that brought us the poverty rhett o rick Jun 2016 #46
Voters are the establishment! Under the bus with you! tandem5 Jun 2016 #38
It's more like a revolution against democracy. Beacool Jun 2016 #44
It's a revolution for democracy. We now have a corporate run oligarchy. But you embrace rhett o rick Jun 2016 #47
It's a fairly untenable position, for sure, in a situation rife with untenable positions. Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #51
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»David Axelrod: a very awk...»Reply #50