Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:01 PM Jun 2016

State Department Blocks Release Of Hillary Clinton-Era TPP Emails Until After The Election [View all]

http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/state-department-blocks-release-hillary-clinton-era-tpp-emails-until-after

State Department Blocks Release Of Hillary Clinton-Era TPP Emails Until After The Election

Trade is a hot issue in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. But correspondence from Hillary Clinton and her top State Department aides about a controversial 12-nation trade deal will not be available for public review — at least not until after the election. The Obama administration abruptly blocked the release of Clinton’s State Department correspondence about the so-called Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), after first saying it expected to produce the emails this spring.

The decision came in response to International Business Times' open records request for correspondence between Clinton’s State Department office and the United States Trade Representative. The request, which was submitted in July 2015, specifically asked for all such correspondence that made reference to the TPP.

The State Department originally said it estimated the request would be completed by April 2016. Last week the agency said it had completed the search process for the correspondence but also said it was delaying the completion of the request until late November 2016 — weeks after the presidential election. The delay was issued in the same week the Obama administration filed a court motion to try to kill a lawsuit aimed at forcing the federal government to more quickly comply with open records requests for Clinton-era State Department documents.


It makes one feel like they are hiding something...

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Say it again - the Obama administration. The SoS works for, and does what the president says. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
How can we blame her, when we're not even allowed to hear what she said? Kentonio Jun 2016 #9
So when she takes credit for "setting up" the Iran deal... ljm2002 Jun 2016 #15
Obama steps in it RobertEarl Jun 2016 #2
"His legacy will be destroyed" PepperHarlan Jun 2016 #3
That's all he has left is his legacy RobertEarl Jun 2016 #5
Uh huh PepperHarlan Jun 2016 #6
Nice picture of you RobertEarl Jun 2016 #7
This isn't surprising, really HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #4
So, you are ok with this? Bread and Circus Jun 2016 #12
Nope. It's just not surprising. HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #20
Agree. Bread and Circus Jun 2016 #22
Interesting... Expect to see TPP passed in "Lame Duck Session KoKo Jun 2016 #8
Gosh, would those emails cause Clinton to lose the election if Zorra Jun 2016 #10
It disgusts me that Obama's State Dept is withholding information... Barack_America Jun 2016 #11
Remember when Obama ran on transparency as a rebuke to George W Bush? I do. Bread and Circus Jun 2016 #13
I, in fact, do. And it's one of the reasons I campaigned for him. Barack_America Jun 2016 #16
Given what NAFTA did for the average American, I can see why. Octafish Jun 2016 #14
Obama is FOR TPP. If he's blocking the correspondence, it's because he's covering for her. Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #17
She is part of his Legacy. KoKo Jun 2016 #21
What could possibly be the most logical explanation for blocking this until NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #18
A Third Way corporatist looking out for another Third Way corporatist Broward Jun 2016 #19
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»State Department Blocks R...»Reply #0