Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

senz

(11,945 posts)
66. He has never said nor implied that. You must be thinking of Hillary.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 04:15 PM
Jun 2016

And there is no way either of them can reach 2383 delegates on Tuesday. It will not be "officially" over until the superdelegates vote at the convention in July.

Rules are rules, sorry.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sanders is likely to win her district. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #1
Hmmm, honestly you could very well be right pinebox Jun 2016 #4
The entire democratic establishment will move behind Hillary between now and the day after DC, qdouble Jun 2016 #2
I don't believe someone's campaign has enough common sense to stop making asses of themselves. nt puffy socks Jun 2016 #5
And that has to do what with my OP? pinebox Jun 2016 #7
It's the bullhorn tactic. Ignore facts and shout, "We won! We won!" senz Jun 2016 #50
Apparently pinebox Jun 2016 #51
Democrat here. Sorry, you can't claim victory until you have it. senz Jun 2016 #57
Why hasn't Warren endorsed Sanders? Does she know something? nt. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #3
Based upon what Bernie's supporters were saying until about a week ago, this was a given. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #6
Yes, she knows how politically powerful Hill is -- and how vindictive, too. senz Jun 2016 #67
Damn straight. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #68
One more reason to keep her out of the White House. senz Jun 2016 #70
FDR and I disagree with that thought. Nt NCTraveler Jun 2016 #71
FDR would never support a Third Way/DLC/Blue Dog for president. senz Jun 2016 #73
That was not the topic. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #74
How much longer 'til the Vince Foster conspiracy choir chimes in? Zambero Jun 2016 #78
For the same reason Obama, Biden, Carter and Gore haven't endorsed anyone onenote Jun 2016 #8
No, not quite pinebox Jun 2016 #10
Not quite what? onenote Jun 2016 #29
She wants folks to vote on their own, but is definitely backing Clinton Democrats Ascendant Jun 2016 #9
Interesting link, have you seen this one? pinebox Jun 2016 #12
Right. Democrats Ascendant Jun 2016 #15
Yes she most certainly is pinebox Jun 2016 #19
Great pic! Democrats Ascendant Jun 2016 #31
They've been close for ages pinebox Jun 2016 #33
Is your Google broken? Pelosi has said she does not want to influence the vote in CA. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #11
Alrrrrrighty then pinebox Jun 2016 #14
I think you're fishing for an Alertable response, but are being too obvious about it. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #20
Uh you go ahead and you think that way pinebox Jun 2016 #24
Nancy said she is remaining neutral, but she day at a press conference she would endorse 'her'. nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #13
Re-word your title? pinebox Jun 2016 #17
CNN has reported that Hillary is holding back commitments from 40 supers to release on Wed. anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #16
Hmmm....that is interesting pinebox Jun 2016 #18
Why hasn't Nancy Pelosi endorsed Bernie yet? Happyhippychick Jun 2016 #21
You could say that pinebox Jun 2016 #26
I don't understand Happyhippychick Jun 2016 #41
Here's my take pinebox Jun 2016 #43
Ah, got it. I didn't realize she hadn't endorsed then either. Happyhippychick Jun 2016 #46
Ya pinebox Jun 2016 #47
Yes she definitely does. Happyhippychick Jun 2016 #48
She knows that a united front behind the presumptive nominee is more important TwilightZone Jun 2016 #22
The higher level party member you are, the later you endorse the candidate*. FSogol Jun 2016 #23
POTUS and VP don't endorse until after primaries pinebox Jun 2016 #27
Same reason Obama or Paul Ryan didn't endorse anyone Renew Deal Jun 2016 #25
Eh, not sure Paul Ryan is the right reference pinebox Jun 2016 #30
He's her peer. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #35
In a matter of speaking, yes pinebox Jun 2016 #37
Lol, Ryan did it with a clothespin on his nose and possibly a gun to his head! Democrats Ascendant Jun 2016 #39
No kidding pinebox Jun 2016 #44
and whats funny about it drray23 Jun 2016 #79
Perhaps Pelosi is afraid that when she does, Barbara Boxer will pop up and GreatGazoo Jun 2016 #28
Ack.... pinebox Jun 2016 #32
People get choices and she prefers her state vote before she declares. It is an obvious. She is seabeyond Jun 2016 #34
I'm still figuring out any noteworthy endorsement that sanders has by a SD..still haven;t found one beachbum bob Jun 2016 #36
I'm not concerned with endorsements honestly pinebox Jun 2016 #38
gotcha...just doing the implication that a lack of endorsement means something serious beachbum bob Jun 2016 #40
Why is it you guys are so jaded? pinebox Jun 2016 #45
Maybe she busy with the laundry? zappaman Jun 2016 #42
The primary is tomorrow. WhiteTara Jun 2016 #49
Because she saw what Barbara Boxer was subjected to? (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #52
Boxer taunted Nevada Democratic voters. She wasn't "subjected" to anything. senz Jun 2016 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife Jun 2016 #63
Hillary has reportedly asked some SDs to not commit publicly yet. Sancho Jun 2016 #53
So Hillary controls Democratic SDs too? senz Jun 2016 #69
The ones who come and tell her they will support her. Sancho Jun 2016 #72
I'm glad she hasn't loyalsister Jun 2016 #54
For the same reason that President Obama and Biden have not. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #55
Pelosi is a Democrat. Why would she endorse a repub-lite?...n/t monmouth4 Jun 2016 #56
Neither Pelosi nor Warren have endorsed the Party favorite. Yes, that says something. senz Jun 2016 #59
Didn't she say Bernie would make a better president or have a better chance against Trump? pdsimdars Jun 2016 #60
No, I'm pretty sure you're making that up. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #65
To avoid antagonizing Sanders' supporters. Beacool Jun 2016 #61
So...Pelosi's endorsement of Hill would turn people off Hill? senz Jun 2016 #64
What doesn't add up is what you just wrote. Beacool Jun 2016 #80
Unlike Sanders who has all but said he is the nominee MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #62
He has never said nor implied that. You must be thinking of Hillary. senz Jun 2016 #66
Reasons Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #75
how about WEDS? MFM008 Jun 2016 #76
Nancy certainly knows that timing is essential Zambero Jun 2016 #77
She did it today Renew Deal Jun 2016 #81
+1 JoePhilly Jun 2016 #83
Derp. n/t JTFrog Jun 2016 #82
... grossproffit Jun 2016 #84
Now she has. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #85
Haven't deleted this thread yet? JoePhilly Jun 2016 #86
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why hasn't Nancy Pelosi e...»Reply #66