Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GRhodes

(162 posts)
7. LOL!
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:32 PM
Jun 2016

DeLong mistook a reader's comment for Smith's, and riffed on that. Did you miss that? It's clear what he was doing when he referenced November.

DeLong, however, did say this about Hillary Clinton in 2003:

http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/2003_archives/001600.html

My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.

So when senior members of the economic team said that key senators like Daniel Patrick Moynihan would have this-and-that objection, she told them they were disloyal. When junior members of the economic team told her that the Congressional Budget Office would say such-and-such, she told them (wrongly) that her conversations with CBO head Robert Reischauer had already fixed that. When long-time senior hill staffers told her that she was making a dreadful mistake by fighting with rather than reaching out to John Breaux and Jim Cooper, she told them that they did not understand the wave of popular political support the bill would generate. And when substantive objections were raised to the plan by analysts calculating the moral hazard and adverse selection pressures it would put on the nation's health-care system...

Hillary Rodham Clinton has already flopped as a senior administrative official in the executive branch--the equivalent of an Undersecretary. Perhaps she will make a good senator. But there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Naked Capitalism Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #1
Can you define right wing? GRhodes Jun 2016 #2
They want to turn American workers into bowl of rice workers Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #6
Explain what the hell you are talking about GRhodes Jun 2016 #9
To "chronicle" something means to tell about it, to report on it, to provide evidence that it is tblue37 Jun 2016 #10
The above poster said nakedcapitalism is "right wing" GRhodes Jun 2016 #13
HE said it is right wing. I am saying it is PRO-LABOR, ANTI-Oligarchy, tblue37 Jun 2016 #15
It is on the website Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #14
They support the opposite of what you say they support. nt tblue37 Jun 2016 #16
Only in Bernieland is criticizing an article considered a "threat". YouDig Jun 2016 #3
Is it too much to ask GRhodes Jun 2016 #4
I read it, there wasn't any "threat". There was well-deserved criticism of some idiots YouDig Jun 2016 #5
LOL! GRhodes Jun 2016 #7
You forgot to point to the "threat". Can you at least spell out your conspiracy theory for us? YouDig Jun 2016 #8
As I said above, is it too much for the head in the sand crowd GRhodes Jun 2016 #11
So your conspiracy theory is so dumb you refuse to even try to explain it. That says something. YouDig Jun 2016 #12
I just looked at the various links and I don't know what the hell BootinUp Jun 2016 #17
Hillary is so much like Nixon that it's scary Doctor_J Jun 2016 #18
Vietnam, Kent State, Watergate. Contras, stolen elections, superpredators and welfare queens, IWR reddread Jun 2016 #20
Where is the threat? nt sufrommich Jun 2016 #19
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton Loyalist Authorit...»Reply #7