Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: We are too over confident at DU [View all]DemocratSinceBirth
(101,842 posts)78. I Like Just About Any Candidate With A (D) After His Name
After all as my name indicates it's a congenital condition; albeit a positive one.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Same Aggregators Who Accurately Predicted A Bush* Win In 04 Are Predicting An Obama Win Now./nt
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#1
Respectfully If Folks Thought Kerry Had The Momentum In 04 They Were Woefully Misinformed
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#29
In 04 I Was Shocked For About Six Hours Because Leaked Raw Exit Polls Were Wrong
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#31
After the debacles of 2000 and 2004, I won't start dancing until Romney gives his concession speech
Arkansas Granny
Nov 2012
#54
IM not seeing that here I see more DEBBIE DOWNER posts on hear you casn shake a stick at
bigdarryl
Nov 2012
#5
I agree; it ain't over 'til it's over. Btw, don't get mad, but it's 'too' in this case, not 'to'.
codjh9
Nov 2012
#6
I was here in 2004, and in the aftermath of 2000. You wouldn't be so cavalier if you'd been here too
progressivebydesign
Nov 2012
#22
Yes, and why are we comparing John Kerry's campaign to Obama's? Kerry's road was much harder
Liberal_Stalwart71
Nov 2012
#81
It actually does matter.. to US. 2004 election was ugly and painful here. nt
progressivebydesign
Nov 2012
#21
If You Just Look At The Data Bush* Was Doing A Teeny Bit Better Than O At The Nat'l Level
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#99
The people who would have had to "tamper" with it are the people who DO the national exit poll.
FBaggins
Nov 2012
#108
"He refused, consistently, to release precinct-level polling data from Ohio...."
allrevvedup
Nov 2012
#116
If The Fix Is In, Why Vote? That Would Seem To Just MakeThe Pain Worse.
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#50
Unfortunately I have to agree with you. CNN just reported latest polls: concluded dead heat nt
JudyM
Nov 2012
#28
Lot Of Research That Indicate Aggregated State Polls Are More Accurate Than National Polls
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#63
I Largely Agree For The Reasons You Cited But I Expect Them To Roughly Converge/nt
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#101
Because They Are Measuring The Same Universe. State Polls Are Measuring Just Individual Parts Of It
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#112
Charnin: "The Final 2004 National Exit Poll switched 6.7% of Kerry responders to Bush"
allrevvedup
Nov 2012
#84
I'm Getting Reamed In This Thread For Not Being Sufficiently Miserable
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#68
Could You Please Point Me To The Data That Details Romney's Path To 270?
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
#126