2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: We are too over confident at DU [View all]FBaggins
(28,755 posts)Anyone at all?
If you don't like the answer, too bad
The "answer" from Wikipedia? Wow... I guess that's final.
The reality is that he did work with respected researchers in a number of ways (the Election Science Institute comes to mind) and the AAPOR specifically requires that pollsters restrict access to the kinds of data that the conspiracy theorists demanded.
More importantly, the use you want to put exit polls to (to validate actual reported vote counts) is not why they exist. So it's perfectly reasonable to deny raw data to groups whose only purpose is to use the data in ways that aren't intended. Exit polls exist to tell us why people voted the way they did, not how they voted... so they are naturally normed to the reported voting population.