2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Newly released FBI documents shows Petraeus disclosures less damaging than Clinton emails [View all]Gothmog
(145,130 posts)The OP was really funny if you understand the legal concepts. I was planning on posting the Politico article when time permitted because it really supports the concept that Clinton will not be indicted because there is no proof of intent to violate the law. Petraeus knew he was violating the law and took steps to conceal such violations (a great proof of intent) and even with that type of evidence, was given a slap on the risk.
As noted earlier, the FBI has found no intent by Clinton to violate the law and without strong evidence of such intent there will be no indictment. In the Petraeus case, the FBI had clear and convincing evidence of intent to violate the law and even then there was only a slap on the wrist.
Laypersons are amusing when they attempt to discuss legal concepts