2016 Postmortem

jzodda

(2,124 posts)

33. You are wrong!

Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:45 AM

Jun 2016

Yes intent is key- Its why Petraeus was in trouble. The FBI even said as much as did the General.

Negligence is not key here because State dept did not agree with the classification to begin with.

You have to intentionally disseminate classified material to those who had no right to see it. That IS the standard.

"She had emails with the actual names of agents who were undercover in the middle east." YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN! They were talking about a NY TIMES ARTICLE which mentioned agents. The information was already out in the public domain.

Check the mother Jones article link posted in this thread by Gothmog.

Here for you to check out:

The so-called "Top Secret" emails were all about NYT stories concerning drones and were in the public domain

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/02/yep-top-secret-emails-were-all-about-drones

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

6/9 Reuters Emails in Clinton Probe Dealt with Planned Drone Strikes [View all] grasswire Jun 2016 OP

This isn't relevant any more.... chillfactor Jun 2016 #1

I disagree, not matter how much unity is around, if this blows up... Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #12

Why wouldn't this post be allowed? panader0 Jun 2016 #17

The censorship is already ramping up. I can hardly believe it. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #22

So glad you clarified that for us all. Have you notified the FBI yet? That would pdsimdars Jun 2016 #21

This is DAMN relevant! Ignoring the importance is dangerous! pinebox Jun 2016 #29

It's relevant to the FBI. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #35

You need not wait for June 16 to support the Democratic cause. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #2

Your headlinne is incorrect. annavictorious Jun 2016 #3

I don't think we'll have to worry about more posts like this going forward Tarc Jun 2016 #4

DU was never a place where you couldn't discuss pertinent news. Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #13

Inflammatory grandstanding over fringe issues to savage a Democratic candidate Tarc Jun 2016 #15

The FBI investigation, even if you won't admit it, is not a fringe issue or grandstanding Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #16

*CLAP*CLAP*CLAP* Tarc Jun 2016 #20

Ignorant. Loudestlib Jun 2016 #27

You're on a Democratic website, promoting shite about the Democratic presidential Tarc Jun 2016 #28

Tarc, this is news, plain and simple pinebox Jun 2016 #30

We'll see how it flies on June 17th Tarc Jun 2016 #34

Agreed, context matters pinebox Jun 2016 #36

Which is why the OP didn't bother to provide a link. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #11

The OP has also been FFR'd. nt auntpurl Jun 2016 #24

OP also has 50,000 posts. pinebox Jun 2016 #31

"Reuters" sounds more legit Planot Jun 2016 #26

I don't know what to make of this. Barack_America Jun 2016 #5

The email fairy is retired. You didn't get the memo? YouDig Jun 2016 #6

Wait? The FBI quit their investigation? panader0 Jun 2016 #19

Clinton supporters don't want to know anything about her. senz Jun 2016 #7

Reporters asked a good question I didn't see reported elsewhere. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #8

*yawn* philosslayer Jun 2016 #9

I don't think the 16th is going to have any bearing on discussing new items relating to Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #14

A full fledged member of Princess Hillary's ostrich army. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #23

K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #10

The most damning email was not about the program details, but about a NY times article jzodda Jun 2016 #18

Oh god, no. In this area of law, intent is not a factor. Neglegence is. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #25

You are wrong! jzodda Jun 2016 #33

Sooner or later you'll understand that you are wrong. This is one area of law that pdsimdars Jun 2016 #38

K&R pinebox Jun 2016 #32

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #37