Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Preview of the FBI report. [View all]DCBob
(24,689 posts)40. Gross negligence.
Gross negligence is a legal concept which means serious carelessness. Negligence is the opposite of diligence, or being careful. The standard of ordinary negligence is what conduct deviates from the proverbial "reasonable person." By analogy, if somebody has been grossly negligent, that means they have fallen so far below the ordinary standard of care that one can expect, to warrant the label of being "gross." Prosser and Keeton describe gross negligence as being "the want of even slight or scant care", and note it as having been described as a lack of care that even a careless person would use. They further note that while some jurisdictions equate the culpability of gross negligence with that of recklessness, most simply differentiate it from simple negligence in its degree.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_negligence
============
What Hillary did is nowhere near gross negligence.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What we do know for certain is that Hillary's lawyer was Gen Petraeus's lawyer in his case.
politicaljunkie41910
Jun 2016
#59
He got off without jail time, so his lawyer isn't half bad. But, he won't become President, either.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#62
What Petraeus did was willful and intentional which makes what he did much worse than
politicaljunkie41910
Jun 2016
#64
No, it's the other way around. The exposure of classified materials in HRCs case is far worse.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#65
That's your opinion. I'll stick to mine. I worked many years in the environment and I know how
politicaljunkie41910
Jun 2016
#67
The damn investigation has gone on for 9 months. Either they have something or they don't
still_one
Jun 2016
#2
I suspect its going to come out in the next few weeks during the down time before the convention.
DCBob
Jun 2016
#3
I hope you are right Bob. This has gone on too long, and it is ridiculous. I also think your OP
still_one
Jun 2016
#5
Comey has been reported as hating the Clintons 1-on-1 conversations. May be the opposite
ashtonelijah
Jun 2016
#14
That is what is a concern to me, that this is no longer and investigation, but a political maneuver
still_one
Jun 2016
#20
Using your own private service in your closet is not serious carelessness? PLUS, with the importance
Skwmom
Jun 2016
#47
She was aware that her Blackberry and server were uncertified for classified info, was warned
leveymg
Jun 2016
#60
Congrats! You just made a gross negligence case under 18 USC 793(f)(1) and (2). That's two felonies!
leveymg
Jun 2016
#51