Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Old news! Recycled garbage!! Nothingburger! RW Smearjob!!! reformist2 Jun 2016 #1
Date on the link says June 10th...that's fairly recent Jack Bone Jun 2016 #28
Article says 2011, not recent, just a rerun. Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #30
This is the first reporting of this story. We got the 2011 emails via FOIA JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #35
No, 2011 is when Hill appointed him to the board. She was SOS in 2011. senz Jun 2016 #37
good grief.... chillfactor Jun 2016 #2
Why should this be blocked? HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #5
Probably because while factual, it does not give the entire picture. leftofcool Jun 2016 #11
Then please, fill us in on the part that CNN left out. HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #14
*cricket* JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #36
Negative talk could demoralize Hillary supporters, thereby helping Repugs! reformist2 Jun 2016 #12
We will never be demoralized. leftofcool Jun 2016 #15
Exactly. How can we get demoralized, if we never read about any of Hillary's mistakes! It's perfect. reformist2 Jun 2016 #18
Sorry, Bernie lost. Hope you get it out of your system real soon leftofcool Jun 2016 #22
How is the story about the Clinton Foundation about Bernie? Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #32
if it's not Heralding the Second Coming RazBerryBeret Jun 2016 #76
Remember when this place was kind of fun and cool? Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #80
YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT IT ISN'T ABOUT BERNIE LOSING! ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #88
trumptrumptrump 840high Jun 2016 #19
You did it beautifully! senz Jun 2016 #41
Because your title reads like I'm reading FreakRepublic or a Faux News message board Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #47
But constructive criticism will always be allowed... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #59
I would think you're right, but not everyone agrees thesquanderer Jun 2016 #79
...by a HRC supporter who has no business being a host of anything... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #82
The article yes, the straight-from-the-sphincter-of-FAUX-news choice of title Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #81
Title, no. Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #83
Well whoopty-doo for you. I've been here since 2004. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #86
Great way to build a bridge... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #87
There's nothing "RW" about it. It's a factual article from CNN HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #74
It's CNN, but it's sourced to literally Citizens United. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #85
I know, right? It will be like living in a protective bubble. reformist2 Jun 2016 #10
And then you won't have to read any news about Hill's history. senz Jun 2016 #39
i know right? elana i am Jun 2016 #3
Another stupid post The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #4
Really? So you have counter evidence to what was stated in the article? HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #7
It's not worth arguing about. It's stupid on its face, The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #24
Stupid that Hill rewards major donors with positions they're not senz Jun 2016 #40
Pay to play baby! jalan48 Jun 2016 #6
I know who we did not nominate KingFlorez Jun 2016 #8
No reply to op? 840high Jun 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author KingFlorez Jun 2016 #21
So that's how you respond to bad news about Hillary? senz Jun 2016 #42
I except that Bernie lost and I'm not bitter about it. NWCorona Jun 2016 #78
He is not a stock broker leftofcool Jun 2016 #9
He's called a 'securities trader' right there in the article... HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #13
Try reading the man's actual resume. leftofcool Jun 2016 #17
From Wikipedia (Because I can't view his entire profile on LinkedIn) HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #23
The IASB had him chucked off in 2 days, he was that unqualified Arazi Jun 2016 #25
His actual resume? You mean the one State Dept refused to give to a reporter for a story on Quals? JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #38
It isn't up to the State Department to give out anyone's resume. That is up to the individual. leftofcool Jun 2016 #61
In Hillaryland, he's not a "stock broker", he's a "securities reviewer"! reformist2 Jun 2016 #60
... AzDar Jun 2016 #16
"conservative group Citizens United" -- nuff said. Sparkly Jun 2016 #26
Please leave Gomez163 Jun 2016 #27
Why? Don't you want to know what Hill did as SOS? senz Jun 2016 #43
I see some of you are ALL FOR Citizens United Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #49
This has nothing to do with Citizens United. senz Jun 2016 #51
Oh, it has EVERYTHING to do with CU. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #52
I guess ya'll progressives like CU now? leftofcool Jun 2016 #62
cough Clinton SuperPACs funded thanks to Citizens United ruling cough chascarrillo Jun 2016 #65
They dislike facts pinebox Jun 2016 #70
FOUR Days to go... brooklynite Jun 2016 #29
Four days until you won't have to know any more about your candidate? senz Jun 2016 #45
This isn't a news outlet, It's a privately owned forum. leftofcool Jun 2016 #63
We didn't nominate the Clinton Foundation, and Hillary's connection there is as a donor. pnwmom Jun 2016 #31
Never even sent any emails. Right?! unc70 Jun 2016 #33
Your days of being able to insult the Democratic nominee here are numbered. pnwmom Jun 2016 #34
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #48
Then why did she appoint a major Foundation donor to a position senz Jun 2016 #44
If you knew more about boards, you would understand pnwmom Jun 2016 #46
But the professional staff were baffled by it & then he had to resign senz Jun 2016 #50
self-delete pnwmom Jun 2016 #53
LOL, I'm going to be generous and assume you're tired tonight, pnwmom. senz Jun 2016 #55
You're right, I misread that. Thanks for clarifying. pnwmom Jun 2016 #56
He is/was an expert in the field of computer security leftofcool Jun 2016 #77
The IASB had him chucked off in 2 days, he was that unqualified Arazi Jun 2016 #91
No wonder I couldn't find salary information about this board. It's an unpaid position! randome Jun 2016 #68
Citizens United says he was unqualified and you believe them. LMAO! leftofcool Jun 2016 #64
"No income"? Bill got paid $500,000 by the foundation for a one hour speech. Then there's this ... Scuba Jun 2016 #69
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #54
I remember the same crap MFM008 Jun 2016 #57
Letting people sleep over in the White House is one thing... HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #75
It's going to be a ruthless GE. So much on both sides to be outed. George Eliot Jun 2016 #58
Only a few more days and we can ignore this corrupt behavior. Yay.... think Jun 2016 #66
That we KNOW she's vulnerable to blackmail and picked her anyway doesn't say much for us. Scuba Jun 2016 #67
With your 'special' knowledge, perhaps you should warn her about this, then. randome Jun 2016 #71
What position? I didn't mention any position. Or any special knowledge. Scuba Jun 2016 #72
But you "know" she's subject to blackmail. randome Jun 2016 #73
Two Clintons. 41 years. $3 Billion. Inside the Clinton Donor Network (WaPo 2015) bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #84
Thanks for supporting the ticket in November SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #89
This slippery slope became obvious felix_numinous Jun 2016 #90
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This is who we nominated....»Reply #20