2016 Postmortem

kerry-is-my-prez

(10,317 posts)

55. You mean the Rupert Murdoch- owned newspaper that is known to be ultra conservative?

Sun Jun 12, 2016, 03:27 PM

Jun 2016

I am a New York Times/Boston Globe reading Clinton supporter who has been an ACLU- carrying Liberal for many years. I had always followed and supported Sanders but did not vote for him because I didnt believe he could win nor would he be able to get the support behind him to be effective. I agree with his ideas/issues but NOT his recent actions. As a long-time feminist, I also would like to see a female president instead of another white male.

Don't put all HRC supporters in the same category and stereotype us.

Just as the HRC supporters shouldn't assume that all Sanders supporters are young white males or college kids or insult them or Sanders by saying that he is racist/sexist - which I do not believe.

I doubt there are many Clinton people who read and agree with the WSJ. Apparently there are Sanders supporters who do read the WSJ, however, and are confident enough in it to post articles from it on a message board. Pretty ironic, isn't it???

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

104 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why did HRC use her unsecure Blackberry/Clintonemail.com when she had a secure phone/fax? [View all] leveymg Jun 2016 OP

implies, apparent, could have, refused. yep something doesnt quite add up. charges with NO proof nt msongs Jun 2016 #1

The Sec. of State CANNOT authorize drone strikes!!! AllTooEasy Jun 2016 #56

Newsflash..... tabasco Jun 2016 #61

Under Sec. Clinton, State became a drone targeting decision-maker. DOS also became a top spy leveymg Jun 2016 #97

To get the real answer... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #2

"4 legs good 2 legs better" NWCorona Jun 2016 #10

Yessss... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #15

Orwell was ahead of his time! NWCorona Jun 2016 #19

That is definitely playing out... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #30

"Some animals are more equal than others." leveymg Jun 2016 #100

I guess you have failed to notice that there is something truly DURHAM D Jun 2016 #3

Maybe the OP can think about more than one thing a day. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #5

Constant repeat of the same drivel isn't thinking. nt DURHAM D Jun 2016 #7

Shouldn't you be focussing all of your attention on the "truly more important going on today?" Gore1FL Jun 2016 #9

This! NWCorona Jun 2016 #16

!!! MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #18

Why is she a hypocrite? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #26

No she replied to the thread as being too unimportant to exist and then kept posting in it Gore1FL Jun 2016 #29

If a person is willing to vote for a candidate that has questionable practices..... peace13 Jun 2016 #102

It shows what some folks priorities are... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #25

Some people can think about more than one thing in a day. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #32

Now if she is like my sister the answer would be simple. She jwirr Jun 2016 #4

Even your sister can use a land phone? Yes? We know Hillary uses her fax. leveymg Jun 2016 #23

Yes my sis can and does use a land phone. jwirr Jun 2016 #36

Then, she could send and receive classified information at home over a gov't issued phone. leveymg Jun 2016 #42

Point taken. And I also would like to know why Hillary did jwirr Jun 2016 #54

Jury Results Gore1FL Jun 2016 #6

You squeaked by this time. Have to agree with #7 kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #11

It's more than our team vs theirs. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #13

Please see Post 12. Thank you in advance. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #17

I saw it. You called out a DUer. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #24

Where? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #38

The one you directed me to. Please quit shitting on DU. Shitting on DU makes DU suck. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #40

I'm tired of having this board look like a right wing website. I won't say it looks like Free Repub. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #37

As I replied in post 13... Gore1FL Jun 2016 #44

So the WSJ is right wing too? panader0 Jun 2016 #28

You mean the Rupert Murdoch- owned newspaper that is known to be ultra conservative? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #55

That would be the same Murdoch who held a fundraiser for Hillary? 2cannan Jun 2016 #68

Priceless!!! MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #21

I really don't care why. Warren Stupidity Jun 2016 #8

Who is the "she" demanding congratulations??? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #22

I think Warren is speaking of Trump n/t TexasBushwhacker Jun 2016 #58

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #12

I'm pretty sure there are a few more people excited... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #27

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #33

You are really being uncivil on this thread. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #39

It's hard for some to let go. NWCorona Jun 2016 #43

It's weird that people think the declared presumptive Dem nominee is so fragile Gore1FL Jun 2016 #46

I have a feeling that the purge will be regretted in due time. NWCorona Jun 2016 #49

I've been around since 2001. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #63

This is one that posted yesterday "let bygones be bygones" notadmblnd Jun 2016 #86

I believe this post was on target.... chillfactor Jun 2016 #45

Gee... I go away for a little while and I'm not even missed! MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #72

This shit doesn't help one bit Arazi Jun 2016 #48

This message was self-deleted by its author Duval Jun 2016 #14

It seems to me that her refusal to use secure systems implies intent. panader0 Jun 2016 #20

Legally, one doesn't have to show more than "gross negligence." That fits the facts here. leveymg Jun 2016 #31

^^^That^^^ onecaliberal Jun 2016 #34

I think it has something to do with the rolling passwords. NWCorona Jun 2016 #35

That's why one hires aides who have a better memory than the boss. leveymg Jun 2016 #51

Sharing a password would be an immediate offense but I do wonder in her case. NWCorona Jun 2016 #53

3 more days... chillfactor Jun 2016 #41

Echo Chambers are AWESOME! nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #47

If you want to post RW garbage feel free to create a Free Republic account. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #71

Demonstrate the Bias. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #73

You need me to demonstrate the bias for you of Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal? Really? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #92

I was hoping you'd demonstrate the bias of the article in question, actually nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #104

Thanks for the threats. leveymg Jun 2016 #98

Calling it unsecure is a judgement call, and... scscholar Jun 2016 #50

Her "experts" and lawyers apparently weren't expert. leveymg Jun 2016 #52

The OpenNet network that state.gov uses was unsecure for classified information BlueStateLib Jun 2016 #66

These TS/SAP drone kill communications should have been sent over the Joint Intel secure system. leveymg Jun 2016 #99

Blackberry phones have survived so long because of their superior security bhikkhu Jun 2016 #57

Is Clintonemail.com her address or is this an attack brand? RogueTrooper Jun 2016 #59

Her email from the context of the OP and an attempt to go there in a web browser to see. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #60

Ancient Alien theorists believe ... JoePhilly Jun 2016 #62

You have nothing to say. leveymg Jun 2016 #65

It appears she wanted a communications system that was outside of public purview tabasco Jun 2016 #64

How is that done considering that all her emails were sent to or received from a state.gov account BlueStateLib Jun 2016 #67

Actually many of her staff used personal email accounts and some of them even used clintonemail.com 2cannan Jun 2016 #69

When was the last time you sent a fax? ucrdem Jun 2016 #70

About a month ago. leveymg Jun 2016 #74

There's this new gadget called a smartphone ucrdem Jun 2016 #75

I think that whole apple thing was about setting precedent. NWCorona Jun 2016 #76

Indeed but if that was a load of crap it's hard to take the present hoo-ha seriously. nt ucrdem Jun 2016 #77

That angle I have no problem with. NWCorona Jun 2016 #91

During the first week, HRC demanded a half dozen clones of Obama's phone. leveymg Jun 2016 #78

That may be so but she was the US Secretary of State running her department legally. ucrdem Jun 2016 #79

The Dept's communications ceased to be legal within a week leveymg Jun 2016 #83

"ongoing criminal enterprise" is so OTT it shows the whole thing for what it is, a nothing burger. ucrdem Jun 2016 #85

I knew one of the ladies who wrote those letters. leveymg Jun 2016 #87

Hillary didn't blow up the ME, that's foolish. She may have supported some soft power ops ucrdem Jun 2016 #88

Tell us how you were wrong about her before? leveymg Jun 2016 #89

Not Hill, Bill. For years I believed the Nation line that Bill sold Dems down the river ucrdem Jun 2016 #90

Her server was secure and the WSJ article does not say what you claim it says. annavictorious Jun 2016 #80

The server was intruded several times in the first few months after it was taken over leveymg Jun 2016 #81

And 100's of thousands of federal and military personnel private data was compromised off itsrobert Jun 2016 #94

And do you know what the primary cause of successful breaches are? leveymg Jun 2016 #96

Im sorry but WSJ is just another MFM008 Jun 2016 #82

If you actually read the OP, you'd learn that I'm questioning the WSJ piece leveymg Jun 2016 #84

Sometimes, people need an answer right away itsrobert Jun 2016 #93

You haven't read the article, either. It's a remote. You plug in the phone anywhere there's a jack. leveymg Jun 2016 #95

tick tock.. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #101

"Drip, drip" leveymg Jun 2016 #103