Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why did HRC use her unsecure Blackberry/Clintonemail.com when she had a secure phone/fax? [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)74. About a month ago.
A lot of govt agencies and banks are afraid of email. Maybe, not without reason.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why did HRC use her unsecure Blackberry/Clintonemail.com when she had a secure phone/fax? [View all]
leveymg
Jun 2016
OP
implies, apparent, could have, refused. yep something doesnt quite add up. charges with NO proof nt
msongs
Jun 2016
#1
Under Sec. Clinton, State became a drone targeting decision-maker. DOS also became a top spy
leveymg
Jun 2016
#97
Shouldn't you be focussing all of your attention on the "truly more important going on today?"
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#9
No she replied to the thread as being too unimportant to exist and then kept posting in it
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#29
If a person is willing to vote for a candidate that has questionable practices.....
peace13
Jun 2016
#102
Then, she could send and receive classified information at home over a gov't issued phone.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#42
The one you directed me to. Please quit shitting on DU. Shitting on DU makes DU suck. nt
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#40
I'm tired of having this board look like a right wing website. I won't say it looks like Free Repub.
kerry-is-my-prez
Jun 2016
#37
You mean the Rupert Murdoch- owned newspaper that is known to be ultra conservative?
kerry-is-my-prez
Jun 2016
#55
It's weird that people think the declared presumptive Dem nominee is so fragile
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#46
Legally, one doesn't have to show more than "gross negligence." That fits the facts here.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#31
You need me to demonstrate the bias for you of Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal? Really?
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#92
I was hoping you'd demonstrate the bias of the article in question, actually nt
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#104
The OpenNet network that state.gov uses was unsecure for classified information
BlueStateLib
Jun 2016
#66
These TS/SAP drone kill communications should have been sent over the Joint Intel secure system.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#99
Her email from the context of the OP and an attempt to go there in a web browser to see. nt
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#60
It appears she wanted a communications system that was outside of public purview
tabasco
Jun 2016
#64
How is that done considering that all her emails were sent to or received from a state.gov account
BlueStateLib
Jun 2016
#67
Actually many of her staff used personal email accounts and some of them even used clintonemail.com
2cannan
Jun 2016
#69
Indeed but if that was a load of crap it's hard to take the present hoo-ha seriously. nt
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#77
That may be so but she was the US Secretary of State running her department legally.
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#79
"ongoing criminal enterprise" is so OTT it shows the whole thing for what it is, a nothing burger.
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#85
Hillary didn't blow up the ME, that's foolish. She may have supported some soft power ops
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#88
Not Hill, Bill. For years I believed the Nation line that Bill sold Dems down the river
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#90
Her server was secure and the WSJ article does not say what you claim it says.
annavictorious
Jun 2016
#80
The server was intruded several times in the first few months after it was taken over
leveymg
Jun 2016
#81
And 100's of thousands of federal and military personnel private data was compromised off
itsrobert
Jun 2016
#94