Please stop dividing people by race, gender or whatever a narrow mind can possibly contrive ... (Reply #323)

In the discussion thread: Refusal to accept Clinton as the Nominee is Rooted in Misogyny and Racism [View all]

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:31 AM

323. Please stop dividing people by race, gender or whatever a narrow mind can possibly contrive ...

to bring about discord while linking to articles that do nothing more than seek to further an agenda of divisiveness.

Sometimes you just have to call them as you seen them!

Obama never promoted his historic win with "History Made" as the first Black nominee or even POTUS and he never fell back on that as excuse, and yes I had my differences with him in regarding to HC, turning a blind eye to war crimes and those on Wall St.

But he NEVER used his race as a reason to support his agenda. Personally and as a woman over 60 Clinton should follow in his footsteps and not play the gender card.

No I do not want a magnet for 10 bucks with her picture and the words "History Made!"

She would do well to follow Obama's footsteps as he did not feel the need to flaunt his race, nor should she flaunt her gender.

Policies and positions are what history will ultimately decide their fate, many, many years after we are gone.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

366 replies	Author	Time	Post
Refusal to accept Clinton as the Nominee is Rooted in Misogyny and Racism [View all]	bravenak	Jun 2016	OP
Don't forget conspiracy theorism.	TeacherB87	Jun 2016	#1
Absolutely	bravenak	Jun 2016	#3
Absolutely and as basic than misogyny and racism.	Hortensis	Jun 2016	#230
It has a religiosity about it that I just can't understand	bravenak	Jun 2016	#251
Oh, yes. Areligious fanaticism. For sure.	Hortensis	Jun 2016	#256
Bingo. I found that among my poker friends. One quietly admitted that HRC is not evil incarnate and	bettyellen	Jun 2016	#296
appeal to the far right??? what planet are you on??	AntiBank	Jun 2016	#294
AntiBank, Sanders set out to draw from the right	Hortensis	Jun 2016	#298
if you truly mean far hard right, you are delving into white nationalists who would NEVER support a	AntiBank	Jun 2016	#310
So was that the reason Sarah lost in 2008?	yeoman6987	Jun 2016	#79
She is an idiot who could not even give the name of a newspaper she reads.	pnwmom	Jun 2016	#102
Uh, you're quoting SNL, not reality.	MadDAsHell	Jun 2016	#134
That skit was based on a real interview with Katie Couric.	pnwmom	Jun 2016	#137
Agreed	TeacherB87	Jun 2016	#197
This Post	liberalmike27	Jun 2016	#129
+1!	tecelote	Jun 2016	#178
+27	k8conant	Jun 2016	#308
McCain was the top of that ticket and he lost	WhiteTara	Jun 2016	#228
Don't forget pacifism.	lostnfound	Jun 2016	#185
++ Good esp. considering how Bush and Bill work @ UBS	Octafish	Jun 2016	#200
Excerpt	bravenak	Jun 2016	#2
It's the "right kind of votes" thing that still gets me	mcar	Jun 2016	#56
I found it highly insenstive	bravenak	Jun 2016	#57
Not from purported progressives	mcar	Jun 2016	#58
I was offended too.	WhiteTara	Jun 2016	#96
I agree, it is hard to quit them of this type of thinking	bravenak	Jun 2016	#97
Not a surprise to me	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#108
No kidding	Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin	Jun 2016	#241
I don't know what your REAL purpose is behind these posts	Red Knight	Jun 2016	#184
I can totally tell who did not even read the first paragraph	bravenak	Jun 2016	#191
Oh yes--I read it before I responded.	Red Knight	Jun 2016	#218
The title was also not written by me	bravenak	Jun 2016	#223
thank you!	ruggerson	Jun 2016	#203
blah,blah,blah...blah de fucking da	Armstead	Jun 2016	#212
We all saw your OP about HRC knowing her place...	bettyellen	Jun 2016	#219
Guess not.	Armstead	Jun 2016	#220
You did not even read it if thats what you got out of it.	bravenak	Jun 2016	#226
I did read it....But all that was really needed to know was the offensive headline	Armstead	Jun 2016	#243
There there, it will be okay	bravenak	Jun 2016	#249
I don't need your "there, there's" thank you.	Armstead	Jun 2016	#250
Aww! It's gonna be fine, you'll see.	bravenak	Jun 2016	#252
This message was self-deleted by its author	Matt_R	Jun 2016	#284
Are you the FBI?	bravenak	Jun 2016	#286
This message was self-deleted by its author	Matt_R	Jun 2016	#288
...	bravenak	Jun 2016	#289
This message was self-deleted by its author	Matt_R	Jun 2016	#290
Still not scared	bravenak	Jun 2016	#291
Post removed	Post removed	Jun 2016	#292
So,	Glamrock	Jun 2016	#4
Try reading the article linked	bravenak	Jun 2016	#7
The piece of	lancer78	Jun 2016	#45
This message was self-deleted by its author	Matt_R	Jun 2016	#285
It's not an article - it's someone's blog.	jillan	Jun 2016	#104
So?	bravenak	Jun 2016	#109
I don't want Warren as the VP pick. I would prefer Sec Julian Castro. But I trust	underthematrix	Jun 2016	#12
Castro is about ready as Rubio would be. Propped up more by the media and institution than anything.	TheBlackAdder	Jun 2016	#26
Please do not compare Castro to Rubio.	sheshe2	Jun 2016	#55
Some of the things I have seen of Castro are disturbing...	JonLeibowitz	Jun 2016	#81
Would you link please?	sheshe2	Jun 2016	#88
It was in the politico profile	JonLeibowitz	Jun 2016	#95
Ah-Politico--the RW mouthpiece!!	riversedge	Jun 2016	#168
Yet, you love citing scores of their articles when it fits your narrative.	TheBlackAdder	Jun 2016	#193
This was a pretty poor source, and more innuendo than factual.	Sancho	Jun 2016	#181
Positions? Just a lot of Centrist Happy talk and complaints about the GOP.	Armstead	Jun 2016	#214
Sounds like he'd fit in perfectly with an HRC admin	jack_krass	Jun 2016	#344
I agree	Florencenj2point0	Jun 2016	#107
Impressed that a DUer has included Asians as people of color.	MadDAsHell	Jun 2016	#135
yes, as Viet Namese ...	Florencenj2point0	Jun 2016	#187
Would you ever compare two men in such a manner? nt	msanthrope	Jun 2016	#28
Ouch!	sheshe2	Jun 2016	#53
Of course	Glamrock	Jun 2016	#90
I am so glad you've explained how comparing women's hair color isn't sexist at all. Truly. nt	msanthrope	Jun 2016	#145
...	MoonRiver	Jun 2016	#204
I, too, found it very strange	athena	Jun 2016	#208
I suppose anyone who makes fun of Trump's hair is being inappropriate	Armstead	Jun 2016	#244
Keep digging. nt	msanthrope	Jun 2016	#245
Thank you. I'll dig as much as I want.	Armstead	Jun 2016	#246
yes why not?	azurnoir	Jun 2016	#132
That you refer to women by their hair color is not something I would brag about, but you go right	msanthrope	Jun 2016	#144
you asked if anyone would refer to men in that manner I replied I didn't refer to any women	azurnoir	Jun 2016	#149
OMG....You mentioned your hair color!	Armstead	Jun 2016	#247
This message was self-deleted by its author	Matt_R	Jun 2016	#287
I'm sure that the hypothetical Sanders supporter you reference	annavictorious	Jun 2016	#49
The point was denying the legitimacy of her victory	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#110
The OP is the perfect, perfect rhetorical frame.	lumberjack_jeff	Jun 2016	#123
The article isn't about people who don't support Hillary, it's about people who DENY THAT SHE WON.	Lord Magus	Jun 2016	#299
I'll accept that you have a link but call the claim absolute bullshit. But you have every right to	floriduck	Jun 2016	#5
It's not bullshit at all. I called this months agi	bravenak	Jun 2016	#6
Then I guess your call is bullshit too. Everyone makes mistakes at some point.	floriduck	Jun 2016	#8
+ a zillion	840high	Jun 2016	#77
+ a zillion and one	chwaliszewski	Jun 2016	#86
Saying 'rooted' goes too far, but there is an element of that in the tone-deafness.	CrowCityDem	Jun 2016	#9
I think the titles always do that bombastic thing	bravenak	Jun 2016	#24
you know	DemonGoddess	Jun 2016	#10
Hard for them to see since it's not aimed at them	bravenak	Jun 2016	#27
Reminds me of my first pass at grad school, where I began to have my doubts about ...	Hekate	Jun 2016	#125
Every F'ing thing about Clinton	RazBerryBeret	Jun 2016	#11
This. She's done so much...	scscholar	Jun 2016	#16
Just think what her presidency	RazBerryBeret	Jun 2016	#17
Tick tock!	leftofcool	Jun 2016	#61
You are a woman?	sheshe2	Jun 2016	#66
How so?	DawgHouse	Jun 2016	#82
Same here.	840high	Jun 2016	#78
That is a very broad generalization, which indicates a lack of critical thinking.	tabasco	Jun 2016	#13
It is an amazing, gratuitous over-simplification.	Baitball Blogger	Jun 2016	#44
+10,000 nt	Live and Learn	Jun 2016	#59
+1,000,000	ancianita	Jun 2016	#242
Right, Criticizing Clinton is racist because she's white.	lumberjack_jeff	Jun 2016	#14
Criticizing PoC who vote for her as having "Stockholm Syndrome" certainly is. nt	msanthrope	Jun 2016	#33
the racist part is about dismissing the fact that she won largely because of the margins	qdouble	Jun 2016	#41
Presenting POCs as a unified homogenous block is racist.	chascarrillo	Jun 2016	#201
Most != homogenous	uponit7771	Jun 2016	#205
No, saying stuff like "Hillary won the Confederacy" is.	TwilightZone	Jun 2016	#47
No. But denying the votes of the millions of largely black and latino voters	pnwmom	Jun 2016	#106
ummmmm no	Florencenj2point0	Jun 2016	#113
Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup, UBS, and millions in cash have much more to do	think	Jun 2016	#15
Exactly.	elleng	Jun 2016	#18
.+1	840high	Jun 2016	#80
"When people say that Clinton stole the election or that Sanders is the true winner,	sufrommich	Jun 2016	#19
"The right kind of votes"	Quayblue	Jun 2016	#25
Not in my case she's likable enough, I don't want her near the White House	Autumn	Jun 2016	#20
Not in my case. I just don't like him period. But, I don't like angry white men.	leftofcool	Jun 2016	#63
I don't like angry men either, black or white. Interesting how you added race to it. nt	Autumn	Jun 2016	#74
Perhaps not in your case, but it has been demonstrated on DU, Kos, etc.	JonLeibowitz	Jun 2016	#83
You calling the overwhelming number of jews who support Hillary antisemites	MattP	Jun 2016	#100
Don't know where you got that, you must have replied to the wrong person .	Autumn	Jun 2016	#111
It's Hill-logic. Get used to it...	jack_krass	Jun 2016	#346
Bernie is no more jewish than I am	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#115
Nonsense. Bernie has not touted any religious roots. nt	Autumn	Jun 2016	#117
Well seeing what happened to his father's family someone had their number.	gordianot	Jun 2016	#128
Oh, did your grandparents die in the Holocaust?	Zen Democrat	Jun 2016	#231
NO my grandparents survived German occupation in WWI	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#358
More hill-logic, being jewish means a race and culture	jack_krass	Jun 2016	#347
Yep	jack_krass	Jun 2016	#345
It's all true. It was on the internet.	TheCowsCameHome	Jun 2016	#21
This:	ismnotwasm	Jun 2016	#22
Exactly	bravenak	Jun 2016	#38
Wrong.	babylonsister	Jun 2016	#23
The article isn't about Sanders supporters in general, just the holdouts	ucrdem	Jun 2016	#30
As a holdout...	Chan790	Jun 2016	#37
It said at the beginning it was not about everyone, just a portion	bravenak	Jun 2016	#32
Then maybe your OP title should reflect that.	babylonsister	Jun 2016	#40
I copied the title verbatim	bravenak	Jun 2016	#42
This article is about Bernie supporters who deny she won the primary	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#112
.	Baitball Blogger	Jun 2016	#29
No, it's not.	Chan790	Jun 2016	#31
You obviously did not read it	bravenak	Jun 2016	#35
Posts about gender and race bring out the old players	ismnotwasm	Jun 2016	#48
Feel like old times!!!	bravenak	Jun 2016	#50
Sure does!	ismnotwasm	Jun 2016	#52
What you advocate is not going to happen.	leftofcool	Jun 2016	#64
In 2008, there were a small number of Clinton supporters who hoped	Eric J in MN	Jun 2016	#34
Maybe they were	bravenak	Jun 2016	#36
Quite a few of those PUMAs were indeed racist.nt	sufrommich	Jun 2016	#43
You are making a different point than the article.	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#118
Yes, it is. nt	LexVegas	Jun 2016	#39
Lol!! Keep going back to the well eh? SMDH	Arazi	Jun 2016	#46
The denial phase.	HassleCat	Jun 2016	#51
You know what I think?	ismnotwasm	Jun 2016	#62
Yeah... no.	anAustralianobserver	Jun 2016	#54
I accept Clinton as the nominee. I just won't vote for her. nt	Live and Learn	Jun 2016	#60
Bye bye!	leftofcool	Jun 2016	#65
See you. Where are you going? nt	Live and Learn	Jun 2016	#69
Then DU is not the site for you.	athena	Jun 2016	#67
I think you would probably be happier there. nt	Live and Learn	Jun 2016	#68
Because I support the Democratic Party's presidential nominee?	athena	Jun 2016	#70
I was thinking about the issues. But you are right, it doesn't really matter which site. nt	Live and Learn	Jun 2016	#71
Clearly, you have not bothered to look at Hillary's positions on the issues.	athena	Jun 2016	#76
It can be a bit difficult since she is constantly flipping but I assure you that I know where she	Live and Learn	Jun 2016	#91
Thanks for the insult.	athena	Jun 2016	#93
The insulter is now insulted? Cute. nt	Live and Learn	Jun 2016	#198
Al From laughs....	think	Jun 2016	#75
5 more days. You have 5 more days to tell this mixed raced woman	jillan	Jun 2016	#72
Was your name in this article?	bravenak	Jun 2016	#85
That article nailed it.	sheshe2	Jun 2016	#73
I don't agree with that.	bigwillq	Jun 2016	#84
This is not about thise who accept that she won	bravenak	Jun 2016	#87
Before I even finish reading the article.....	Florencenj2point0	Jun 2016	#89
I agree that he has not pulled her to the left	bravenak	Jun 2016	#94
This is total bullshit	ciaobaby	Jun 2016	#92
That's not what the article said	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#121
My opinion aside	ciaobaby	Jun 2016	#124
Well you certainly haven't stated why you think the win was illegitimate	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#293
let's try this again	ciaobaby	Jun 2016	#297
OK you made the argument that if a white male thought the process was rigged	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#316
It is apparent you have already made up your mind	ciaobaby	Jun 2016	#355
You missed my point	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#357
I don't think it is wise for you to compare what Hillary did in 2008.	ciaobaby	Jun 2016	#359
+1 (NT)	Eric J in MN	Jun 2016	#122
Reminds me of birtherism	treestar	Jun 2016	#98
Me too. This is terrible	bravenak	Jun 2016	#99
And racist?	TheFarseer	Jun 2016	#101
Here here!! She has been calling me a racist for a year (?) and I am a mixed race.	jillan	Jun 2016	#103
Yeah , I'm white and I hate Hillary because she is white	TheFarseer	Jun 2016	#105
This message was self-deleted by its author	m-lekktor	Jun 2016	#114
comprehension much?	Florencenj2point0	Jun 2016	#116
No, I get it	TheFarseer	Jun 2016	#120
yes, it makes perfect sense	Florencenj2point0	Jun 2016	#188
They have a thing about projection.	VulgarPoet	Jun 2016	#350
Wow, does that person do anything Besides post on message boards?	TheFarseer	Jun 2016	#356
I dont think so	swhisper1	Jun 2016	#119
This is fucked up!	peace13	Jun 2016	#126
Everything is	bravenak	Jun 2016	#127
This message was self-deleted by its author	Duckhunter935	Jun 2016	#130
Post removed	Post removed	Jun 2016	#131
Absolutely there's unconscious misogyny.	betsuni	Jun 2016	#133
I agree with you	bravenak	Jun 2016	#140
I think the assumption that she must be lying about EVERYTHING	gollygee	Jun 2016	#158
I will bookmark this for link evidence, thanks.	betsuni	Jun 2016	#173
As another poster said, this article is genius propaganda knowing liberals are terrified of...	MadDAsHell	Jun 2016	#136
If people vote based on the ops I post?	bravenak	Jun 2016	#143
You're awfully prideful aren't you?	MadDAsHell	Jun 2016	#282
You do realize that you are replying to your own self with this post, right?	bravenak	Jun 2016	#283
What's your opinion about the article you linked to?	tralala	Jun 2016	#138
Some of it	bravenak	Jun 2016	#141
Nah...i just simply don't like corrupt candidates...	tex-wyo-dem	Jun 2016	#139
IMO a rather lazy catch all appeals to the emotions no critical thinking required	azurnoir	Jun 2016	#142
So, if you don't believe Hillary won the nomination fair and square	AgingAmerican	Jun 2016	#146
Massive K & R. Thanks for posting. So spot on.	Surya Gayatri	Jun 2016	#147
No, it's rooted in cheating and corporate control of the message.	cui bono	Jun 2016	#148
That accusation has now been hurled so many times,	Betty Karlson	Jun 2016	#150
I think women	MFM008	Jun 2016	#151
Is this your opinion?	Lunabell	Jun 2016	#152
yes, that is the op's opinion. She's made it abundantly clear in many posts	cali	Jun 2016	#156
She did run a racist campaign in 08	bravenak	Jun 2016	#274
Still beating this drum?	PaulaFarrell	Jun 2016	#153
This is the same type of op I posted before this primary started.	bravenak	Jun 2016	#164
sorry you can't post something and expect people not to read it	PaulaFarrell	Jun 2016	#216
People posting in ths very thread did not bother to 'read' it. Just complain.	bravenak	Jun 2016	#221
what disgusting bull. And I say that as someone who accepted that	cali	Jun 2016	#154
Almost like you voted for the white woman, you anti-Semite!	Juicy_Bellows	Jun 2016	#157
Funny how automatically you seem to think I wrote this or completely agree with anything	bravenak	Jun 2016	#161
Obvious is obvious And you are nothing if not obvious.	cali	Jun 2016	#195
I never was a front	bravenak	Jun 2016	#227
The last time I checked, Hillary and Bernie are both Caucasian.	B Calm	Jun 2016	#155
So what.	bravenak	Jun 2016	#166
I suppose just not agreeing with the candidate's positions is out of the question.	Vinca	Jun 2016	#159
People should read the writing posted at the link	bravenak	Jun 2016	#167
You sure it doesn't have anything to do with a $15 minimum wage?	Ash_F	Jun 2016	#160
Not everything follows your idea of what people do or should want	bravenak	Jun 2016	#162
Another race baiting flame post from a Hillary supporter allowed to stand!	B Calm	Jun 2016	#163
How about you try to concentrate on your own posts?	bravenak	Jun 2016	#165
Well of course you believe that, after all you did DURec your own OP.	B Calm	Jun 2016	#169
Absolutely	bravenak	Jun 2016	#171
I don't think people are reading the linked opinion piece	gollygee	Jun 2016	#170
Thank you for posting that	bravenak	Jun 2016	#172
Refusal to acknowledge inequality is rooted in wealth and power.	Orsino	Jun 2016	#174
Not always the case	bravenak	Jun 2016	#175
Accepting that she won a rigged process is another necessary step in our evolution.	Orsino	Jun 2016	#177
K&R!	stonecutter357	Jun 2016	#176
It most Definately IS rooted in Bigotry.	Sky Masterson	Jun 2016	#179
Why must you post your anti Hillary/Mighty Israel posts here?	bravenak	Jun 2016	#183
The post claimed that lack of support for hillary was bigotry	Sky Masterson	Jun 2016	#186
So you just decided not to actually read the linked piece and instead let me know	bravenak	Jun 2016	#190
I read about two lines of it.	Sky Masterson	Jun 2016	#192
It doesn't say that	gollygee	Jun 2016	#281
Nonsense...	KansDem	Jun 2016	#180
Yes, those refusers love her policies, love election irregularities, but hate her gender and race.	Scuba	Jun 2016	#182
Lies.	PowerToThePeople	Jun 2016	#189
Why do some hillary supporters continue to try to stir up shit? Like this OP? Why????? nt	Logical	Jun 2016	#194
Hillary's war mongering, and her supporters	cpwm17	Jun 2016	#196
4 more days...NUFF SAID	MoonRiver	Jun 2016	#202
Selfishness is the cause of all evil in this world.	cpwm17	Jun 2016	#206
I certainly don't defend war. And who, exactly, was commander in chief	MoonRiver	Jun 2016	#207
That would be Bush.	cpwm17	Jun 2016	#209
So, in case you didn't know, here is the list of DEMOCRATIC Senators who voted yay.	MoonRiver	Jun 2016	#210
Hillary, to this day, openly supports war.	cpwm17	Jun 2016	#213
Please post links to support those claims. Thank you in advance.	MoonRiver	Jun 2016	#217
Here are some:	cpwm17	Jun 2016	#233
Well,	MoonRiver	Jun 2016	#248
Have no idea why discussion of Hillary and US internal politics gets turned into anti Israel screed	bravenak	Jun 2016	#240
K&R	Starry Messenger	Jun 2016	#199
K&R	workinclasszero	Jun 2016	#211
I agree	MaggieD	Jun 2016	#215
So glad to see you	bravenak	Jun 2016	#222
Nice to see you too	MaggieD	Jun 2016	#224
Surprised too.........	bravenak	Jun 2016	#225
Or it could be that..	OKDem08	Jun 2016	#229
This article is a crock of shit	democrattotheend	Jun 2016	#232
what the writer fails to understand-	Deb	Jun 2016	#234
Not enough will leave and we will need to bring in moderates to make up for you guys who do leave	bravenak	Jun 2016	#235
Some of it is, some of it is just plain old stubbornness and pettiness.	Rex	Jun 2016	#236
Yep	bravenak	Jun 2016	#237
Me too, I always planned on voting for the primary winner.	Rex	Jun 2016	#238
I am pretty positive that many of the 'dead enders' are not really on our side anyway	bravenak	Jun 2016	#239
Agreed and that applies to many topics, a lot of us overlap somewhere in our progressive ideology.	Rex	Jun 2016	#269
The ones who don't fear a Trump presidency or a Trumpian Supreme Court	bravenak	Jun 2016	#271
OMG. Cruz scared the shit out of me!	Rex	Jun 2016	#273
He reminded me of that Left Behind series	bravenak	Jun 2016	#275
Oh yeah, speaking of another wackadoodle the man himself - Kirk Cameron.	Rex	Jun 2016	#279
So true.	bravenak	Jun 2016	#280
If you believe that, then you must also believe she's unelectable.	Marr	Jun 2016	#253
She doesn't say that opposing Hillary is based on racism and misogyny	gollygee	Jun 2016	#254
So it's a sort of low simmering racism/misogyny, that will evaporate after the convention?	Marr	Jun 2016	#257
What?	gollygee	Jun 2016	#259
Actually, Bravenak just clarified her own point, and it isn't the one you made.	Marr	Jun 2016	#260
That is not what I said at all	bravenak	Jun 2016	#262
Regardless, it isn't a big group of people	gollygee	Jun 2016	#263
Not a big chunk	bravenak	Jun 2016	#255
You're counting on Libertarians and Republicans...	Marr	Jun 2016	#258
I'm saying that many of the holdouts ARE libertarians and Republixans	bravenak	Jun 2016	#261
That's even more nonsensical.	Marr	Jun 2016	#264
Many of his voters were NOT DEMOCRATS	bravenak	Jun 2016	#265
I also saw threads started by people	gollygee	Jun 2016	#266
I saw that time and time again	bravenak	Jun 2016	#268
Many of Hillary's supporters are Independents, too.	Marr	Jun 2016	#267
Hillary never tried to pull in Trump voters	bravenak	Jun 2016	#270
This is one of the more frustrating threads ever	gollygee	Jun 2016	#276
I think they just look at my name and the title and just make assumptions	bravenak	Jun 2016	#278
Exactly. If it's this bad among Sanders supporters, imagine what it's like among non-liberals. n/t	lumberjack_jeff	Jun 2016	#295
Of course hope stupid of me......	whistler162	Jun 2016	#272
This is not about you then	bravenak	Jun 2016	#277
OMG... I didn't record this, all these days. ;) . I believe. Nt	seabeyond	Jun 2016	#300
Strange how they now want her to 'beg' thrm for their votes	bravenak	Jun 2016	#301
Beg Sanders. The winner get on her knees and .... BEG Sanders. Ya. Pretty damn disrespectful	seabeyond	Jun 2016	#302
They are so transparent	bravenak	Jun 2016	#303
Pretty transparent as they point elsewhere and insist we look away. Nt	seabeyond	Jun 2016	#304
Oh yes. The only thing worse than sexism is talking about sexism	bravenak	Jun 2016	#306
No it's not. In fact, if HRC were a man with the same resume and the same PROBLEMS, he never	jonno99	Jun 2016	#305
Bullshit	bravenak	Jun 2016	#307
Here's the line that I almost stopped at:	bonemachine	Jun 2016	#309
It kinda is a fact	bravenak	Jun 2016	#311
the problem with the assertion is that	bonemachine	Jun 2016	#313
Its a democratic party - not an independent party	Whimsey	Jun 2016	#319
Those are your opinions	bonemachine	Jun 2016	#322
Clinton won by any measurable metric.	TwilightZone	Jun 2016	#312
open primaries would have been one leveler...	bonemachine	Jun 2016	#315
Another blogger with an opinion masquerading around as	Exilednight	Jun 2016	#314
That's the thing, too	bonemachine	Jun 2016	#354
Oh yeah-that's it for sure.	jalan48	Jun 2016	#317
A nasty, factless, baiting editorial. (nt)	w4rma	Jun 2016	#318
Yes, and denial of the above maladies. nt	eastwestdem	Jun 2016	#320
Hillary got more Votes. And, a huge majority of those votes come from POC and Women	Cha	Jun 2016	#321
I really cannot see why they are still trying the same tactics today	bravenak	Jun 2016	#325
They don't want us to talk about this reality. either.. they're still trying	Cha	Jun 2016	#328
He showed us which groups are worth his attention and which ones are not	bravenak	Jun 2016	#329
From the very beginning his approach was misguided.. if he thought he had	Cha	Jun 2016	#331
That is why he lost	bravenak	Jun 2016	#333
I know you will, brave, and I thank all of you from the	Cha	Jun 2016	#334
Awww!	bravenak	Jun 2016	#335
So Happy	Cha	Jun 2016	#336
Please stop dividing people by race, gender or whatever a narrow mind can possibly contrive ...	slipslidingaway	Jun 2016	#323
Please stop acting like the cause of racial division is black people discusding racial issues	bravenak	Jun 2016	#324
Never said that, just comparing the "History Made" of Clinton campaign, which many are promoting ...	slipslidingaway	Jun 2016	#330
Maybe some segments of the population have had too much power over others for too long and	bravenak	Jun 2016	#332
Can you imagine a 20 year old, poor Jewish man chaining himself to a black person ...	slipslidingaway	Jun 2016	#337
Of course I can imagine it	bravenak	Jun 2016	#339
Thank you for this	Haveadream	Jun 2016	#365
They who? here's my take what has deveeloped this campaign as I've already stated	azurnoir	Jun 2016	#338
You know what? Not everything is about you personally and I actually avoid getting into it with you	bravenak	Jun 2016	#340
No it quite obviously wasn't about me personally but I outlined how I was affected personally	azurnoir	Jun 2016	#341
Very difficult to suss out your meanings	bravenak	Jun 2016	#342
Bull. It's rooted in a love of traditional FDR style Democratic values, which get little support	highprincipleswork	Jun 2016	#326
FDR who left the military segregated and left blacks and domestics (women) out of social security?	bravenak	Jun 2016	#327
Wrong again.... this is ban-bait, but Ill bite....	jack_krass	Jun 2016	#343
Get ready for James Comey to be labeled the biggest sexist in the history of men. n/t	yodermon	Jun 2016	#348
Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate in the field	Gothmog	Jun 2016	#349
So completely dumb as hell. n/t	Herman4747	Jun 2016	#351
This lady begs to differ:	Herman4747	Jun 2016	#352
Why should I care what she has to say?	bravenak	Jun 2016	#361
Of course, it couldn't be her right-of-center politics that doesn't sell well	NorthCarolina	Jun 2016	#353
You could not possibly have read it if that's what you got from it	bravenak	Jun 2016	#360
I reject the entire premise of the title	NorthCarolina	Jun 2016	#362
Then you were just complaining based on title	bravenak	Jun 2016	#363
Don't forget simple gullibility.	Jakes Progress	Jun 2016	#364
I agree with the author except for her claim that open primaries would be "fairer."	SunSeeker	Jun 2016	#366

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.