Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)KING: Hacked DNC documents may show ugly connections between party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign [View all]
Earlier this week it was announced that a hacker breached the servers of the Democratic Party and obtained the DNC's opposition research on Donald Trump. The DNC confirmed as much.
The hacker claims to have given over thousands of additional pages to WikiLeaks.
First, the hacker released financial records from donors to the DNC. Earlier this week the DNC vehemently denied that any such information was accessed or stolen.
Two other documents that are very concerning were internal memos. One, claiming to be written on May 26, 2015, a full year before Hillary was declared the winner of the partys presidential nomination and months before the first primary was held, speaks of her as if she is already the nominee and how they aim to spend the following year preparing her for such a moment.
The DNC is supposed to be an unbiased arbiter of the campaign and this memo suggests anything but that. Furthermore, the memo gives strategies for they can best position her for general election. One of those strategies says they aim to, "Use specific hits to muddy the water around ethics, transparency, and campaign finance attacks on HRC."
How ugly is that? Muddying the water? What a mess.
Another memo claims that they "will utilize reporters to drive a message" but do so "with no fingerprints" on the process so that the public believes the messages are coming from the reporters and not the campaign.
The hacker claims to have given over thousands of additional pages to WikiLeaks.
First, the hacker released financial records from donors to the DNC. Earlier this week the DNC vehemently denied that any such information was accessed or stolen.
Two other documents that are very concerning were internal memos. One, claiming to be written on May 26, 2015, a full year before Hillary was declared the winner of the partys presidential nomination and months before the first primary was held, speaks of her as if she is already the nominee and how they aim to spend the following year preparing her for such a moment.
The DNC is supposed to be an unbiased arbiter of the campaign and this memo suggests anything but that. Furthermore, the memo gives strategies for they can best position her for general election. One of those strategies says they aim to, "Use specific hits to muddy the water around ethics, transparency, and campaign finance attacks on HRC."
How ugly is that? Muddying the water? What a mess.
Another memo claims that they "will utilize reporters to drive a message" but do so "with no fingerprints" on the process so that the public believes the messages are coming from the reporters and not the campaign.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-hacked-dnc-docs-show-ugly-connections-clinton-article-1.2676755
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
40 replies, 2574 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (43)
ReplyReply to this post
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
KING: Hacked DNC documents may show ugly connections between party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign [View all]
w4rma
Jun 2016
OP
You don't think that Democrats should be informed of what is happening within our party? (nt)
w4rma
Jun 2016
#3
It's a game now ... they'll just keep re-posting until the get lucky with a friendly jury.
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#8
"thousands of additional pages" "released financial records from donors to the DNC." (nt)
w4rma
Jun 2016
#16
Normally I let posts like yours be the last word because anyone can see you've lost the debate.
randome
Jun 2016
#22
No, because *perhaps* you're having trouble following the TOS of this site?
Cooley Hurd
Jun 2016
#28
If all of the opposition research on Trump gets to the public without the party having
Tal Vez
Jun 2016
#7
Compared to the excellent job Howard Dean did as DNC Chair, WikiLeaks has exposed the corruption
AtomicKitten
Jun 2016
#17