Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: A reason Sanders is taking his time endorsing Clinton ... [View all]onenote
(46,103 posts)72. I don't think you understand the meaning of the word "often"
Going all the way back to FDR's presidency, there has been only one instance in which the Democratic party's presidential candidate was not decided on the first ballot (1952) and maybe one other instance (1960) where the outcome of the first ballot was in doubt when the voting started. Moreover, since 1976 (ten conventions) there has only been one other time in which the outcome of the first ballot was arguably in doubt when the voting commenced (1980), although the reality was that even in 1980 the drama was more a media creation than actual uncertainty about the outcome.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
keep donating $54 a month for 5 months from 2 million supporters = 1/2 Billion. And there
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
#2
Yes he has opened the eyes of millions which is why the ship takes time to turn ...
slipslidingaway
Jun 2016
#16
Totally agree! And in the end I was in the plus column for months :) Happy to do so! nt
slipslidingaway
Jun 2016
#31
Oh we believe in him alright because of one simple thing. He is telling the truth.
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
#10
You are very wrong but I'm not here to convince you of anything. He is telling the truth.
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
#15
Happy to have his voice fighting for us and have never viewed him as a con man ...
slipslidingaway
Jun 2016
#19
Clinton never needed the money, only a dollar, but this week her campaign called twice ...
slipslidingaway
Jun 2016
#34
Sanders was not backed by big money, Clinton was and benefitted by her name recognition and ...
slipslidingaway
Jun 2016
#25
I have yet to be convinced that he is serious about not contributing to any GOP success.
Maru Kitteh
Jun 2016
#56
early on he said he wouldn't run as independent because that would split the party.
Sunlei
Jun 2016
#55
Excuse you, Mr. Sanders is a Democrat even though he was Independent. His values is for the working
akbacchus_BC
Jun 2016
#44
“I am not now, nor have I ever been, a liberal Democrat,” - Bernard Sanders
Maru Kitteh
Jun 2016
#52
Senator Sanders does exactly what he always said he would do. He's a benefit to our D party platform
Sunlei
Jun 2016
#13
And that Windows 95 is sure good................because 12 million are very happy he is in.
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
#26
If I believed every opinion piece I read in the NYT I would be quite the simpleton.
JonLeibowitz
Jun 2016
#36
I think they both 'tell the truth', Sanders was a benefit to Mrs. Clinton & will continue to be.
Sunlei
Jun 2016
#30
There are millions of individual contributors, he cannot just toss them aside ...
slipslidingaway
Jun 2016
#35
I was proud how high the DU donations got, last I checked it was about $70,000?. maybe more.
Sunlei
Jun 2016
#42
To not vote is sad, apathetic- our one vote is the only real democracy america has. Once elected
Sunlei
Jun 2016
#53
Hillary dropped out 4 days after the last primary in 2008 and fully endorsed Pres. Obama.
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2016
#63