2016 Postmortem

Demsrule86

(71,531 posts)

35. which have been identified as fakes by some. nt.

Reply to appal_jack (Reply #12)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:17 PM

Jun 2016

They have not been authenticated now have they? Sad to see supposed Democrats attacking the DNC.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

90 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hacked DNC documents may show ugly connections between the party and Hillary Clinton... [View all] appal_jack Jun 2016 OP

Why are you disparaging the DNC? Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #1

There is a difference... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #4

I was talking about the comment which was not included in the news article. Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #9

If this reporting is erroneous, I will gladly retract that comment. appal_jack Jun 2016 #14

Then you do not have the correct facts about the DNC. BTW, again it was the comment added and not Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #16

Believe me when I say I don't care what Bernie wants or what you want. nt. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #34

That's nice. appal_jack Jun 2016 #36

why not...it is better than the link you provided which says nothing about hacked donations as you Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #39

"Hacked documents may show"= Solid evidence unavailable. oasis Jun 2016 #2

Images of the leaked documents are at the link. appal_jack Jun 2016 #12

which have been identified as fakes by some. nt. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #35

Which "some"? Are they authoritative? Scootaloo Jun 2016 #42

Authenticate the supposed documents if you can find them. nt. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #44

I'm asking you a question. Scootaloo Jun 2016 #45

Is it even necessary to seek out authoritative sources? randome Jun 2016 #47

I'm interested in knowing who "some" are Scootaloo Jun 2016 #68

Like the weasal word MAY? ohheckyeah Jun 2016 #89

truth to power should not be seen! juxtaposed Jun 2016 #3

Who are we to see what our leaders are doing in our name? RobertEarl Jun 2016 #79

I wish Skinner would've just pulled the damn trigger vdogg Jun 2016 #5

She is the presumptive nominee. Duval Jun 2016 #7

Right...he still has a chance...not... nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #32

What is going to happen at the Convention? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #46

people threatening to hold their breath until they turn blue dlwickham Jun 2016 #55

That wouldn't be healthy. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #57

If he lost fair & square, the truth will out. appal_jack Jun 2016 #8

If Sanders had gotten the popular vote, the pledged delegates, and the super delegates, would Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #10

I have not trusted voting machines since the move to secret, electronic, paperless systems. appal_jack Jun 2016 #17

Right the GOP has cut all the polls but one in my town in Ohio Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #28

We did have the Presidency & both houses of Congress for a few weeks in 2009. appal_jack Jun 2016 #31

Do you understand that unless we win by uuuge margins Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #48

No we didn't have a 60 votes ...not with Lieberman and Kennedy desperately ill. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #73

Sore loser talk Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #30

If he does... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #11

You can't post about him at all Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #26

That is not how I read the rules. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #29

Bernie says he is a candidate Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #49

But he is still a Democrat. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #52

When did he join the Democratic Party? vdogg Jun 2016 #58

He is still running for president as a Democrat. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #59

the election is called by Skinner and he is not the candidate...thus he opposes the candidate... Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #74

I hear you...so tired of it. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #33

And I wish Skinner would have just stuck with the rules that had been working fine for several years Scootaloo Jun 2016 #43

I am sure you do...Bernie juries...and hounding people out of DU. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #75

No. Community standards and ToS enforcement Scootaloo Jun 2016 #78

^^^ THIS ^^^ HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #81

You can do whatever you want on your own Website. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #63

Hillary's supporters don't seem to be "over it" yet, John Poet Jun 2016 #66

Same here, dear. sister_rosa_refried Jun 2016 #69

We should probably wait until HA Goodman weighs-in on this before rushing to a conclusion. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #6

Coming soon no doubt. !! riversedge Jun 2016 #61

This message was self-deleted by its author Grassy Knoll Jun 2016 #13

I don't think "hacked" is a good, reliable source of anything. nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #15

This really sounds like the DNC tried to spin the hack as being GreatGazoo Jun 2016 #18

But Bernie is not the nominee... Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #23

A memo written TO the DNC is evidence of collusion between the DNC and...? randome Jun 2016 #19

It proves the DNC lied about donor info being compromised. appal_jack Jun 2016 #20

Oh, well, maybe they THOUGHT nothing had been stolen. randome Jun 2016 #22

The NYDN was convinced enough to publish. We'll see... appal_jack Jun 2016 #24

Cool. Sorry if I assumed you wouldn't have an open mind. randome Jun 2016 #25

They are desperate to believe that Bernie did not lose and will fall for anthing. nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #50

My daughters preferred Sanders to Clinton but they aren't this naive. randome Jun 2016 #53

My kids liked Sanders too and voted for him in Ohio Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #72

I don't think this proves anything...hard to believe this post survived a jury if it did. nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #37

You do realize that donation information is PUBLIC information WhiteTara Jun 2016 #54

LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #40

The documents don't even stand up to a cursory examination and this is like the 5th thread on them. randome Jun 2016 #41

who says they dont stand up? swhisper1 Jun 2016 #62

Anyone who can read at a comprehensive level will come to that conclusion. randome Jun 2016 #64

Fake documents...monday monday. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #70

I've discovered new depths to human gullibility because of DU. It's incredible. randome Jun 2016 #71

I have seen wishful thinking in the flesh or bytes as it were. haha nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #77

But it HAS to be true ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #85

My biggest complaint regarding my BabyGirl's "education" ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #83

I guess that's true. If the future is in the hands of those who don't self-doubt, we're in trouble. randome Jun 2016 #87

Fake documents last time anyon posted them...the post was hidden as a result. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #21

Take it to crackpot radicals MattP Jun 2016 #27

I went to the link...there is only gossip and innuendo...I would be ashamed to post this. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #38

tick tock.. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #51

"Tick tock". Everyone drink! pinebox Jun 2016 #56

But anyone who has been paying attention didn't need a hacked email to tell us that. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #60

True 'dat. Yet there's more. appal_jack Jun 2016 #65

"Documents "MAY" show ugly connection..." You are pissing over a possible, maybe? Sheepshank Jun 2016 #67

But he hates ohheckyeah Jun 2016 #90

Ohh you didn't know!! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #76

This reminds me of WTC building 7 CT!!! LOL. BootinUp Jun 2016 #80

Right!?! Because buildings that were not hit by planes collapse ALL THE TIME. appal_jack Jun 2016 #82

Another run through the tin foil asile at the grocery store is needed. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #84

K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #86

Let the manufactured debunking felix_numinous Jun 2016 #88