Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sanders Makes Push to Change Party Rules [View all]DemocratSinceBirth
(101,740 posts)7. The more you peer into it the more sense closed primaries make.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I still don't like it, what happens if one party has a Presumptive Nominee and the other doesn't? nt
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#6
States with open primaries don't seem to be suffering from many problems
Chathamization
Jun 2016
#19
Hortensis---Thank you! Well put. I agree with you. This seems to be more about BS's bitterness at
skylucy
Jun 2016
#58
Why should the Republicans decide who the Democratic candidate is or vice versa?
JTFrog
Jun 2016
#18
The purpose of the primaries is to select a leading candidate for the whole country.
-none
Jun 2016
#22
But the Democratic party preselected the candidate they wanted before the primaries even started.
-none
Jun 2016
#29
This response doesn't address the question at hand, open primaries would allow for reThugs to
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#36
Cause the primaries have been mostly closed .... and... no one wants to open the door for reThugs to
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#45
True, nothings perfect... I don't know if the guy who lost is the best person to right the wrongs
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#60
It's already open, though. There's nothing stopping massive amounts of Republicans from registering
Chathamization
Jun 2016
#28
Then they have to go through the process of registering and can't vote in both, that's the point
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#40
They can and get caught later... IF there's a check on them. Either way, no need to make it easier
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#48
No, that would be voter fraud. This is like people pushing voter ID laws.
Chathamization
Jun 2016
#52
I'm not talking about conservative Democrats, I'm talking about actual Republicans
Chathamization
Jun 2016
#51
the people...who are democrats decide in primaries. the people...who are not have the general nt
msongs
Jun 2016
#30
The people who have registered as democrats can ... AND... not vote in both primaries and
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#42
I see the rules on Superdelegates changing ... getting rid of them, probably not
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#10
so the guy who disdains the democrats for 74 years and becomes one for 10 minutes wants to boss
msongs
Jun 2016
#31