Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
10. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be a concern.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:40 AM
Jun 2016

Lots of things aren't a priority issue for voters. That in itself doesn't speak to the importance of any given issue.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Democrats have lots of fights ahead since our "nominee" is a republican (light). n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #1
When did they clash on fracking? I honestly can't recall. randome Jun 2016 #2
I recall, as do most others paying attention... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #5
Good. Maybe she'll realize it's important to take a stand against it, not just regulate it to death. randome Jun 2016 #6
not good... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #8
Your statement about Clinton and coal is incomplete. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #14
And a $30 billion investment in retraining. randome Jun 2016 #15
I agree we have to tackle the problems, but to do so requires more political will. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #16
The "out of business" comment was the one I thought was poorly worded. randome Jun 2016 #17
Her "out of business" comment should have been even STRONGER. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #25
When we reach a crisis point, something will HAVE to be done. randome Jun 2016 #28
We're well past the crisis point. In a lot of cases we are too late. JRLeft Jun 2016 #29
I know how dire things are. I still think we'll come through this. We don't have a choice. randome Jun 2016 #30
Incrementalism is not good enough at this point in time. JRLeft Jun 2016 #32
Colombia Free Trade is putting domestic union coal miners out of business. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #20
I'd have no problem with that. randome Jun 2016 #22
HRC promotes fracking, silent on her investments with KXL, Podesta family BP/Koch/Fracking. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #3
We people already lost the Fracking fight. Autumn Jun 2016 #4
Really, a President Hillary would just ignore the platform anyway. djean111 Jun 2016 #7
Fracking is not a priority issue for most US voters. MineralMan Jun 2016 #9
That doesn't mean it shouldn't be a concern. cali Jun 2016 #10
I didn't say it shouldn't be a concern at all. MineralMan Jun 2016 #12
Elections are about much more than what issues voters care about cali Jun 2016 #13
That does not mean that fracking should not be a priority issue for voters. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #21
I see fracking as a critical issue. I hope that HRC cali Jun 2016 #11
I do too. I hope she pushes for a ban on fracking. Overseas Jun 2016 #19
K&R. His testimony at the platform committee was great. Overseas Jun 2016 #18
What is the short-term alternative to fracking? Adrahil Jun 2016 #23
Renewables are now efficient enough to be both short- and long-term choices. w4rma Jun 2016 #24
Not quite there with renewables. Adrahil Jun 2016 #26
No, we're there. The grid can be updated right along with adding new power to the grid. (nt) w4rma Jun 2016 #31
It doesn't matter, Hillary will do what Hillary wants to do Fumesucker Jun 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Fracking fight looms for ...»Reply #10