Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Odds Hillary Won Without Widespread Fraud: 1 in 77 Billion Says Berkeley, Stanford Studies [View all]apcalc
(4,496 posts)7. There is NO SCHOOL named Standford.
The guy cook this crap up in his basement?
Too funny.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Odds Hillary Won Without Widespread Fraud: 1 in 77 Billion Says Berkeley, Stanford Studies [View all]
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
OP
HRC needs to go out and buy some Powerball tickets. Winning that will be cake to do.
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2016
#40
The reports all over this country cannot just be shoved under the rug of deception. Truth is truth.
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
#5
Guess what: it's possible to fight both Trump and election fraud at the same time.
snot
Jun 2016
#119
Thank you. This election is over. If this crazy stuff is true, then work on it for the next election
kerry-is-my-prez
Jun 2016
#145
"It's a blog by idiots for idiots." And now it's -- shockingly!!-- made its way to GDP!!
Number23
Jun 2016
#117
I've done research that has ended up in reputable journals- you have to use data from peer-reviewed
kerry-is-my-prez
Jun 2016
#147
Have at it guys and gals. There is so much more including those actual studies...
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
#8
It could be the MIC is involved. Or do we pretend they steer clear of our elections?
reformist2
Jun 2016
#12
bernie is one of the MIC's biggest supporters lol. need an F-35? call Uncle Bernie nt
msongs
Jun 2016
#13
It's not Stanford. It's a grad student. There's been no peer or independent review of the study.
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#15
this is the second time in two days I have been called a liar. I am not a liar!...unbelievable.
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
#39
Oh stop! Standford is a totally reputable institution! Many graduates go on to Yell or Hartsvard!
Number23
Jun 2016
#118
Because DU is no longer for anyone but Clinton supporters. No choices otherwise
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
#25
Thanks TZ. I'm hopeless at digging out old threads on are rival versions of DU.
hedda_foil
Jun 2016
#52
I am not surprised, and while the counts have narrowed in California, Hillary will be the winner
still_one
Jun 2016
#30
Does it not seem strange to you that she declared victory before the count in CA and elsewhere
bkkyosemite
Jun 2016
#42
No. That was AP projecting it based on its models and early voting. There are about 1.4 million
still_one
Jun 2016
#51
Surely you can provide links to sources covering Sanders' legal challenges to a primary result?
Tarc
Jun 2016
#48
Crack pot report (not a study), where you bolded way too much-conspiracy style
Sheepshank
Jun 2016
#70
Well then they should take the studies to the WH and the DNC and raise hell if they feel concerned.
Rex
Jun 2016
#83
Then go to the media or Congress, surely this would be front page news all over the world right?
Rex
Jun 2016
#89
If you think Americans don't know this election was stolen by the people who own everything
onecaliberal
Jun 2016
#98
No, I mean the emails that have exposed the fact that the SOS used real names
onecaliberal
Jun 2016
#94
Snopes merely disproved it was a Stanford study- it's by Stanford/Tillburg grad student researchers
AtomicKitten
Jun 2016
#110
I feel sorry for you all. It's embarrassing that you believe this crap. nt
BreakfastClub
Jun 2016
#106
Candidates aren't selected by popular vote, they are selected by those that count the vote. -nt-
NorthCarolina
Jun 2016
#134
The hackable voting machine issue still has not been addressed to my satisfaction since 2000.
EndElectoral
Jun 2016
#143