Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
#2 is the only one that will be truly considered by each state convention. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
For #3, you may have meant to type Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #2
yes I did, fixed. Thanks! nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #3
I support #1 and #2, but I mainly care about #2. tarheelsunc Jun 2016 #4
+1 Garrett78 Jun 2016 #10
Same ... I'm not as concerned about the super delegates. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #23
+3 (my family) Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #31
Ban caucuses. Keep the rest. onehandle Jun 2016 #5
^^this^^ Sheepshank Jun 2016 #11
I favor national election with one set of rules, paper ballot counted with verifiable audit trail. peace13 Jun 2016 #6
"national election with one set of rules" TwilightZone Jun 2016 #7
I'm Going to say this, as a resident of Ohio and a former poll worker..... peace13 Jun 2016 #9
our election system is a hot mess--actually dozens if not hundreds of hot messes geek tragedy Jun 2016 #12
Agreed TwilightZone Jun 2016 #16
Agreed but there is an Article 2 Section 1 issue right off the bat trying to do anything from stevenleser Jun 2016 #25
True, it would require one of many overdue geek tragedy Jun 2016 #26
Amendments require 2/3 majorities and in both houses Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #33
Sadly true nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #34
A national election would eliminate candidates that Bernie Sanders from the start... brooklynite Jun 2016 #8
All of the above, plus..... Armstead Jun 2016 #13
I favor #1, #2 I don't feel strongly about either way. I like the more active democracy of the TheKentuckian Jun 2016 #14
rough percentages thus far (combined) geek tragedy Jun 2016 #15
I would say move on with your life AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #17
We're discussing future changes, not the current system/primaries. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #35
I see disgruntled supporters of a winning candidate AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #37
Ban caucuses and open primaries; keep superdelegates and closed primaries (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #19
Seems like an awfully large amount of people like SD's MadBadger Jun 2016 #20
Could reflect primary divisions, and Trump's geek tragedy Jun 2016 #21
The DNC doesn't determine whether primaries are open or closed BainsBane Jun 2016 #22
I understand that, presumably some hortatory language geek tragedy Jun 2016 #24
I would go for a semi open primary like California. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #27
Caucuses are absolutely awful and I don't understand why anyone would still favor them. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #28
I have the warm fuzzies for the Iowa Caucus IADEMO2004 Jun 2016 #29
Superdelegates save us from cults of personality like Trump. Lyric Jun 2016 #30
What about same day registration? democrattotheend Jun 2016 #32
Exponential permutations. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #38
#3 is a bit severe. SpareribSP Jun 2016 #36
I support all 3 (nt)! bigwillq Jun 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DNC presidential primary ...»Reply #10