2016 Postmortem

LongtimeAZDem

(4,516 posts)

49. Fair enough; I admit that I reacted to your avatar. My apologies (nt)

Reply to floriduck (Reply #48)

Wed Jun 22, 2016, 03:08 PM

Jun 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

**Cali Update** L.A. ballot supervising team fights to prevent discarding 1 in 4 provisional ballots [View all] J_J_ Jun 2016 OP

IMO, Our state campaigns are not over until all ballots are counted. Sunlei Jun 2016 #1

Our system is broken. peace13 Jun 2016 #2

Most people are happy to call it incompetence instead of fraud J_J_ Jun 2016 #17

I hear you. It's a mind boggle! peace13 Jun 2016 #20

"When they sit down we are done" J_J_ Jun 2016 #53

"Paper ballots, counted by hand" has been a DU mantra Retrograde Jun 2016 #26

I have been an election observer, so I understand the process. peace13 Jun 2016 #34

Thank you so much for your good work Martin Eden Jun 2016 #3

I guess Greg Palast LIED when he said provisional ballots wouldn't be counted. I did point still_one Jun 2016 #4

Another good SOS link: unprocessed ballots Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #7

Beat me to it LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #11

Thanks still_one Jun 2016 #13

And as of this morning LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #9

Aaa...was the statement , provisional ballots won't be counted if Bernie concedes? peace13 Jun 2016 #10

What is Aaa? My post has nothing to do with privilege. It was in regard to how California still_one Jun 2016 #14

I wish that Skinner would see this post and respond brer cat Jun 2016 #15

I read the rules & got the impression I was not allowed to say anything negative about Hillary ever J_J_ Jun 2016 #18

Then you didn't actually read them. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #21

Yet it isn't discussed here. peace13 Jun 2016 #30

Does that have any relevance to this thread? brer cat Jun 2016 #23

I agree. We are all under the same rules. I was just on a jury which made some uncalled for still_one Jun 2016 #22

You are not aware of the hides that are happening out here. peace13 Jun 2016 #28

These election workers fought to have these ballots counted J_J_ Jun 2016 #16

No ballots are being "tossed" in the rest of the state Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #31

The right thing often wins! Sometimes it seems like it won't but it does!!! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #5

Here is why crossover ballots were substituted in LA... Kip Humphrey Jun 2016 #6

The training sessions for poll workers were revealing. AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #42

"This is not okay. Our system can do better." demmiblue Jun 2016 #8

WE must demand more! J_J_ Jun 2016 #19

share this! Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2016 #12

Can someone explain the numbers cited in the OP? onenote Jun 2016 #24

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #35

It's shameful that there's still people who still don't believe there's been riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #25

it's shameful there's still those who won't accept their candidate didn't educate their voters KittyWampus Jun 2016 #32

You should educate yourself instead of blaming people for what you don't know about. peace13 Jun 2016 #38

To me, it doesn't matter which state is involved or which candidate wins or loses. It is totally floriduck Jun 2016 #27

The count has been averaging 200,000 ballots per day LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #37

No understanding of the complexity of handling votes by millions of people in hundreds of counties. randome Jun 2016 #40

It's called the wonders of technology. If we had open source electronic voting with paper audit floriduck Jun 2016 #44

And people would be screaming that the counting machines are rigged. LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #45

Open sourcing would solve that. Right now, only the company developers know the rules built in. floriduck Jun 2016 #47

One more thing. This, as I stated above has nothing to do with specific states OR candidates. So floriduck Jun 2016 #48

Fair enough; I admit that I reacted to your avatar. My apologies (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #49

Thanks. I appreciate that. floriduck Jun 2016 #50

Did LA county have any races for party positions on its ballots? Retrograde Jun 2016 #29

Why the hell are we still arguing about this? DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #33

Ummm...they are counting primary ballots. peace13 Jun 2016 #41

What I'm seeing here DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #43

Every vote should count! This is crazy they're still counting Arazi Jun 2016 #36

They have a month to count and certify in CA obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #39

FYI...no one from California (that I know...being born and raised here) likes the nickname "Cali" nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #46

born and raised in California myself J_J_ Jun 2016 #55

Another Californian who doesn't like the nickname "Cali"... anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #57

Count them all but don't extrapolate 580000 from 65000 MattP Jun 2016 #51

But as I've been reading more and more on this post greiner3 Jun 2016 #52

La county is 10 million people so 65000 x 4 is over 500000? MattP Jun 2016 #54

I am disappointed that Democrats would try to rationalize why our system rhett o rick Jun 2016 #56