Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Snarkoleptic

(5,997 posts) Sat Jun 25, 2016, 03:31 PM Jun 2016

Last edited Sat Jun 25, 2016, 05:41 PM - Edit history (1)

30 votes, 0 passes \| Time left: Unlimited
	For it on it's merits.
	1 (3%)
	For it so as to not be counter to POTUS's position.
	1 (3%)
	Both of the above.
	1 (3%)
	Against it.
	25 (83%)
	Other/need more info.
	2 (7%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I am very much against this. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2016 #1

For it. We need to keep raising labor and environmental standards. JaneyVee Jun 2016 #2

there are plenty of other good ways to do that. The TPP AntiBank Jun 2016 #9

TTP lowers them AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #13

It's not working TheFarseer Jun 2016 #15

Ithknk people may be confused by your for or against it hollysmom Jun 2016 #3

TPP will lower labor standards. guillaumeb Jun 2016 #4

The convention will not take political swipes at our President. LuvLoogie Jun 2016 #5

clarify the question please, you ask should if it should be mentioned AntiBank Jun 2016 #6

Well they voted to support it. TDale313 Jun 2016 #7

I saw a mislabled post that said they endorsed, but that wasn't true AntiBank Jun 2016 #8

You're right. Looking closer, they voted not to oppose it. TDale313 Jun 2016 #10

Uncertain - I suspect this is much more subtle than it looks. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #12