Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Matt_R

(456 posts)
38. So a two income household should be the norm?
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 03:21 AM
Jun 2016

I say we double your numbers $20 minimum in Nebraska and $30 Minimum in NYC or LA.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

please read OKNancy Jun 2016 #1
Defeated....it will not be in the final platform pipoman Jun 2016 #3
no, you have it backwards. OKNancy Jun 2016 #4
I didn't know I was reading a play by play...I'll wait to see the final product.. pipoman Jun 2016 #5
Thanks for the clarification berni_mccoy Jun 2016 #7
Clinton's preferred language on a $15 minimum wage is weak and ineffectual. Indexing was rejected. w4rma Jun 2016 #15
Only someone with no grasp of the US would believe such tripe... pipoman Jun 2016 #2
Do you have a recommendation to handle regional differences? MH1 Jun 2016 #9
Pay in rural areas is based entirely on supply of labor pipoman Jun 2016 #17
I think it should be indexed to average income in a geographic area.. pipoman Jun 2016 #20
That would be discrimination against rural workers. B Calm Jun 2016 #25
No it's not.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #36
Yes it is! B Calm Jun 2016 #40
Medicare uses cost of living data to determine payments to physicians country wide. Hoyt Jun 2016 #28
no no no SoLeftIAmRight Jun 2016 #14
In New York or LA, you would be living in a cardboard box, in Cheyenne, a cheap apt., maybe. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #16
Well then...nothing in life should suck... pipoman Jun 2016 #18
"people would never try to do better" - you say SoLeftIAmRight Jun 2016 #35
So a two income household should be the norm? Matt_R Jun 2016 #38
Maybe if money is an issue pipoman Jun 2016 #41
So, a two income "household." Matt_R Jun 2016 #42
For one person, $29k isn't just horrible. Igel Jun 2016 #26
So break down the cost of "basic needs" for us please... Matt_R Jun 2016 #43
Exactly!! Sancho Jun 2016 #6
I remember in the debates Hillary specifically calling to tie it to inflation. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #8
This Johnny2X2X Jun 2016 #13
Well it has to be static number because... JaneyVee Jun 2016 #10
Business should have a vested interest in keeping inflation down berni_mccoy Jun 2016 #12
The Fed loves inflation. Igel Jun 2016 #27
FUCK 'uncertainty'. pansypoo53219 Jun 2016 #30
Business owners set prices as determined by inflationary forces. Why should wages not adjust, too? JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #34
Oh, well. kcr Jun 2016 #45
Yes, the wage should be increased, pegged to the increase in Social Security payments. JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2016 #11
Bozo idea. SS does not reflect honest numbers. George Eliot Jun 2016 #22
My point exactly. Peg them both similarly. If they can't be identical, ... JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2016 #31
Got it. We agree and thanks for response. George Eliot Jun 2016 #33
Can we peg it to the salaries that Congress and the Senate get? Matt_R Jun 2016 #39
I strongly disagree with your method for setting it. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #19
Housing and food costs determine min wage. Forget median anything. George Eliot Jun 2016 #23
No, it's a lot harder than rocket science. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #24
I don't agree. Government does it all the time. George Eliot Jun 2016 #32
Government tries to do it, but they often fail. if government ever got it right Exilednight Jun 2016 #46
I think that's absolutely correct-one qualifier-COLA should be regional George Eliot Jun 2016 #21
First you have to redefine "live in poverty." Igel Jun 2016 #29
Minimum wage should keep up with inflation. Socal31 Jun 2016 #37
I wholeheartedly agree democrattotheend Jun 2016 #44
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Minimum Wage should not b...»Reply #38