The time has come to support Sec. Clinton, my fellow Sanders supporters.

[merrily]

89. 0 for 3 (1) No, it isn't. (2) Harmony Rockets asked Tierra y Libertad about voting, not me and

you did not ask me or anyone else about voting, at least not in this subthread. Therefore, I did not accuse you, even a little, of invading anyone's privacy. Finally (3) My reply 64 to you, which was all of a single, simple sentence pointing out that your implication about the TOS was incorrect, was not the least bit defensive. (My next reply was about your misunderstanding my Reply 64.)

I'm glad you finally agree with me that the TOS does not require any DUer to state how he or she will vote. However, votes are private, just ask Allison Grimes or any other Secretary of State of any state of the U.S.A. That's why there's a curtain on voting machines, and why it must be closed before the occupant can vote. (Boston uses paper ballots, but dividers prevent voters from peeking at each other's ballots.) Loyalty oaths and the like have been considered odious in this country since McCarthy, if not sooner; and you no doubt know the expression about ASSUME-ing. I think we've about beaten the subject to death at this point, anyway.

Have a great, sun-seeking day! The more sunniness we seek and find, the better.