Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: HRC just delivered a thorough response to trust ?s about her: [View all]mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)27. Agree with this
There wasn't any real substance. She said people don't trust her and that she has to work on it, but only alluded to having everything in the book thrown at her, rather that citing examples. She said she's made mistakes but didn't cite examples, only said nobody's perfect. That doesn't show she's learned from her mistakes. She also said the reason she's careful with her words is because she's careful with her words. Logically, that makes "is careful with her words" both the cause and effect and is unlikely to instill confidence in people.
Many people will see this as thoroughly empty.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I respectfully disagree, and invoke the new TOS to not to have to explain myself.
insta8er
Jun 2016
#2
Yep...I want to say more, but technically you are in violation of the TOS by even mentioning this.
insta8er
Jun 2016
#28
I have to agree, but going into details would be against the TOS. So I won't do that.
insta8er
Jun 2016
#26
even if its factual?! tia... The issue is most of them aren't, they're made up shit people stopped
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#55
So your "constructive criticism" is she should list her fuck ups and go into detail repeating the
bettyellen
Jun 2016
#37
Something like that, without the curse words..you know, it is demeaning. But yes lets start with
insta8er
Jun 2016
#43
And too think that would help her? I don't but it.... But I'm not the one who keeps
bettyellen
Jun 2016
#50
It would be a mistake to veer into mistake territory when the question was about trust.
bettyellen
Jun 2016
#54
I think she did fine explaining that she had rethought issues she was mistaken on prior....
bettyellen
Jun 2016
#61
Yes, good statement, Hillary has been vetted for twenty five years and yet she
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#5
Cooties. Boys always say we girls have them. Especially if we have beat them on the playground.
Squinch
Jun 2016
#31
We Dems have permitted the Republicans to direct the Dem conversation far way too long
Sheepshank
Jun 2016
#19
Winger bullshit to focus on non binding statements when biding tax returns from tRhmp
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#58
My issue comes from how active I am in the tech sector, and prepping for a job there.
VulgarPoet
Jun 2016
#70