2016 Postmortem

morningfog

(18,115 posts)

72. I don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

Reply to Post removed (Reply #71)

Wed Jun 29, 2016, 11:48 AM

Jun 2016

The last thing I want is for anyone connected to our nominee or or nominee to be indicted. Check yourself.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

166 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GE polls look great and may they hold and build for Hillary, but FBI investigation precludes comfort [View all] morningfog Jun 2016 OP

Cannot rec this itsrobert Jun 2016 #1

Agreed. revolutionfoundation Jun 2016 #8

+1 nt NCTraveler Jun 2016 #12

Regurgitation of a non issue. Please move on. RBInMaine Jun 2016 #2

It is not a non issue. The FBI doesn't do "non-issues." morningfog Jun 2016 #6

You seem to claim it is an issue... NCTraveler Jun 2016 #13

Your post makes no sense whatsoever. morningfog Jun 2016 #15

But it isn't a "criminal" investigation. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #19

Yes it is. That is the function of the FBI. morningfog Jun 2016 #22

Yes, it is a function - but just one of many. The email investigation is not criminal investigation tonyt53 Jun 2016 #28

No one knows what the investigation is, has, or will ultimately uncover. morningfog Jun 2016 #32

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #35

Different cases, different laws and rules. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #55

No ... The FBI serves many other investigative functions, beyond criminal activities. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #135

Judge links Clinton aide's immunity to 'criminal investigation' morningfog Jun 2016 #137

You wish it wasn't the case? That is why you have started over 100 OP on the topic snooper2 Jun 2016 #142

I doubt it is 100 OPs, but YES. I wish it wasn't the case. morningfog Jun 2016 #145

And you are certain that the un-named "criminal investigation" is targetting HRC ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #143

I have never said that Hillary is a target. morningfog Jun 2016 #144

LOL ... That is such bullshit. But, okay. You stick with that. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #146

Link, quote, or slink on away. morningfog Jun 2016 #148

Your every damned post says you suspect (are hoping for) an indictment of HRC ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #152

Now you are just making shit up. Go ahead. morningfog Jun 2016 #154

Really? The FBI disagrees with you. Old Crow Jun 2016 #160

Judge links Clinton aide's immunity to 'criminal investigation' morningfog Jun 2016 #129

The reality is I have no concerns... You do. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #37

YOu have no foundation for your confidence. morningfog Jun 2016 #39

It is an issue on right wing nut job sites not in the real world Gothmog Jun 2016 #84

The FBI does "non-issues" all the time. Adrahil Jun 2016 #51

Let's hope this is one. They've been at it nearly a year. morningfog Jun 2016 #52

Exactly right! PJMcK Jun 2016 #105

It's an issue. Huma 840high Jun 2016 #151

Bad post metroins Jun 2016 #3

How so? morningfog Jun 2016 #7

Ask yourself metroins Jun 2016 #11

Critical thought and discussion. Recognition and acknowledgement of where we are. morningfog Jun 2016 #14

Where 'we' are... Blanks Jun 2016 #61

That doesn't follow. morningfog Jun 2016 #64

The fact that you REFUSE to follow... Blanks Jun 2016 #156

Only bad if it confounds your set expectations. leveymg Jun 2016 #38

Intent is what's missing from this conversation. randome Jun 2016 #41

Law Enforcement uses a term called willfull blindness or willfull ignorance that may apply here. floriduck Jun 2016 #107

There is no evidence that the Pagliano matter is related to Clinton. randome Jun 2016 #113

Maybe not to you but the FBI had its reasons. You nor I know why. floriduck Jun 2016 #115

I'm not making anything of it. You originally stated Hillary did nothing wrong. My point was to floriduck Jun 2016 #121

Lol metroins Jun 2016 #49

Do you tire of being wrong? Gothmog Jun 2016 #155

Your fourth paragraph is wise PJMcK Jun 2016 #4

Well said!!! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2016 #101

"I support Hillary, BUT..." 72DejaVu Jun 2016 #5

Sorry if you are bothered by the truth. morningfog Jun 2016 #9

You're right, we don't know 72DejaVu Jun 2016 #57

What unsubstantiated negative rumors? Are you denying that the FBI investigation continues? morningfog Jun 2016 #59

There is a substantiated investigation that could bite us in the ass... Human101948 Jun 2016 #80

They will certainly come up in the debates Motley13 Jun 2016 #106

They do look great for us. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #10

I'l rec it. yellerpup Jun 2016 #16

Hope springs eternal in the human breast; Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #17

Indeed. I hope this is resolved favorably for Hillary and her staff quickly. morningfog Jun 2016 #21

It is not a criminal investigation. I believe the FBI has said this. randome Jun 2016 #18

The FBI has not said that. The FBI only does criminal investigations. morningfog Jun 2016 #20

Not true. itsrobert Jun 2016 #23

To characterize this as a criminal investigation is disingenuous. randome Jun 2016 #24

LOL. Look at your list and please identify the the non-criminal investigations. morningfog Jun 2016 #25

You keep slipping your bias into the equation. randome Jun 2016 #31

You seem to have a lack of understanding of how the FBI operates and what they do. morningfog Jun 2016 #34

They investigate people without evidence all the time -background checks and the like. randome Jun 2016 #36

But you do not "know." You hope, for sure. I do too. morningfog Jun 2016 #40

"They would not investigate with no evidence of wrong doing." NCTraveler Jun 2016 #90

Indeed. If there was evidence, there wouldn't be any need for an investigation. randome Jun 2016 #103

LOL. morningfog Jun 2016 #150

You have said that multiple times and it is completely wrong. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #89

Of course it is true. morningfog Jun 2016 #93

No, it is not. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #97

You use the FBI for investigations which aren't criminally related? morningfog Jun 2016 #99

Have a great day. This is hard to watch. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #100

Can you link to such an investigation? morningfog Jun 2016 #102

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #147

Judge links Clinton aide's immunity to 'criminal investigation' morningfog Jun 2016 #149

Judge links Clinton aide's immunity to 'criminal investigation' morningfog Jun 2016 #118

No Rec for the OP. riversedge Jun 2016 #26

Thanks for the kick regardless. morningfog Jun 2016 #29

On this issue I take the Constitutional Lawyer who was elected President at his word. gordianot Jun 2016 #27

Fully agreed. morningfog Jun 2016 #30

... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #33

Your favorite cartoons? morningfog Jun 2016 #44

I think they apply to these ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #46

You are wrong on all counts. To a T. morningfog Jun 2016 #47

That is my interpretation of the inference you insinuate. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #56

Yes, and it is dead wrong and insulting. morningfog Jun 2016 #58

Maybe, but the evidence is not hard to produce my conclusions ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #60

Your prejudgment sees what it wants. morningfog Jun 2016 #62

Perhaps. But, again, your posts speak for themselves. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #63

They do and I stand by them. Your bias reads a lot of bullshit into them. morningfog Jun 2016 #65

Communication is not only what is said; but, also, what is heard ... and that is on you, as well. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #68

No, you don't like what I say. That doesn't mean you are right to make shit up about my intentions. morningfog Jun 2016 #70

Nope. I won't be apologizing for your consistent eeyorism ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #73

Fine. Your character, or lack thereof, is on clear display. morningfog Jun 2016 #74

You have made multiple dishonest statements and are questioning 1strongs character? NCTraveler Jun 2016 #92

You don't know what you are talking about. morningfog Jun 2016 #95

I think you should just stick with that. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #98

It's not my "character, or lack thereof" that is on the line. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #104

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #112

Only to an anonymous poster on an anonymous message board ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #123

This is just a pathetic attempt to type Hillary's name in with some random R B Garr Jun 2016 #42

Nicely put. This 'issue' isn't weighing on anyone's mind so now's the time to bring it up again! randome Jun 2016 #133

Meh. Snowden did a ton more damage and the "concerned" here just love him..... bettyellen Jun 2016 #43

I liked Snowdon, yes. morningfog Jun 2016 #45

Concern is noted and appreciated. Ryano42 Jun 2016 #48

No. This has nothing to do with Bernie. morningfog Jun 2016 #50

What's the point of this post. Adrahil Jun 2016 #53

Discussion. Is this not a discussion board for political discussion? morningfog Jun 2016 #67

Discuss what? What to do if the indictment fairy DOES come? Adrahil Jun 2016 #88

The Hillary machine is rolling now TomJulie Jun 2016 #54

Here is the likely summary of the FBI investigation as it pertains to Hillary Clinton.. DCBob Jun 2016 #66

From what is in the public, I agree with your analysis up the last two points. morningfog Jun 2016 #69

It's my understanding that radical noodle Jun 2016 #119

Wow. I hope so. I wish they'd just get on with it one way or another. The uncertainty is damaging. zazen Jun 2016 #124

Its just mostly common sense based on things that I've read. DCBob Jun 2016 #159

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #71

I don't know what the fuck you are talking about. morningfog Jun 2016 #72

I don't need to check myself MaggieD Jun 2016 #75

Oh yeah! I remember you. morningfog Jun 2016 #77

You remember me because you sent me rude PMs MaggieD Jun 2016 #79

Tsk tsk. morningfog Jun 2016 #82

good grief.... chillfactor Jun 2016 #76

Uh. No, it is an ongoing risk for us. morningfog Jun 2016 #78

Peddling ridiculous right wing talking points dressed up as concern is a disgusting tactic lapucelle Jun 2016 #81

Facts are not right wing talking points. morningfog Jun 2016 #83

An investigation is not an indictment, stopbush Jun 2016 #85

All true, but I hope to hell the investigation is the only step. morningfog Jun 2016 #86

I dunno. Nixon won in a landslide in 1972 stopbush Jun 2016 #94

At the time of the 1972 elections, it was NOT KNOWN that Nixon John Poet Jun 2016 #141

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #87

did we really land on the moon? stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #91

Huh? Do you have a point? morningfog Jun 2016 #96

yes. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #108

I totally got it bravenak Jun 2016 #111

Are you suggesting the FBI is not conducting an investigation? morningfog Jun 2016 #131

And now from left field... PJMcK Jun 2016 #109

Things are getting into CT territory. bravenak Jun 2016 #110

THe FBI and DOJ are not the GOP. morningfog Jun 2016 #114

The GOP initiated it. That's enough for me to know it is straight up bullshit. bravenak Jun 2016 #117

It's already gone to the FBI and the DOJ, the bodies that prosecute crimes. morningfog Jun 2016 #120

It came OUT OF THE BENGHAZI INVESTIGATION. Which is bullshit and they added more shit. bravenak Jun 2016 #122

You can't say it is a fake scandal when the FBI and DOJ are taking it seriously. morningfog Jun 2016 #125

Yes I can. bravenak Jun 2016 #126

The impeachment was by the same kind of right winger nuts that did the Benghazi witch hunt. morningfog Jun 2016 #127

Same shit different day bravenak Jun 2016 #128

Because they are Congress. The FBI and DOJ are independent agencies from separate branches morningfog Jun 2016 #130

They use all of our instituitions in their games. bravenak Jun 2016 #134

It is not clear when or on whose request the FBI started its investigation. morningfog Jun 2016 #136

Find that out then before you get us all 'concerned' bravenak Jun 2016 #138

LOL. It really doesn't matter. The FBI and DOJ do not do the right wingers' bidding. morningfog Jun 2016 #139

And they will end this investigation into rightwing CT with no arrest. bravenak Jun 2016 #140

Ignore it like everyone else. SmittynMo Jul 2016 #161

k&r! and I wish the FBI would hurry the hell up with this because we don't need more uncertainty zazen Jun 2016 #116

He has no more ligitimate concern than does anyone on Hillary's team. upaloopa Jun 2016 #153

This can in fact "be poo-poo-ed away like the faux scandals form Gowdy." Lord Magus Jun 2016 #132

ISIS DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #157

Agreed. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #158

KICK! snooper2 Jul 2016 #162

+1 n/t FSogol Jul 2016 #163

I'm feeling pretty comfortable at this point. Nye Bevan Jul 2016 #164

We will be fine ismnotwasm Jul 2016 #165

+1 Nye Bevan Jul 2016 #166