Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

BRAVO! MohRokTah Jun 2016 #1
Hey! bravenak Jun 2016 #4
It's good to see a fine young wonderful true progressive posting here! MohRokTah Jun 2016 #7
We real progressives have to keep a low profile these day bravenak Jun 2016 #11
Emojis are your friends MohRokTah Jun 2016 #12
Nope GeorgiaPeanuts Jun 2016 #2
I disagree completely bravenak Jun 2016 #6
You may disagree but the TPP gives Corporations the capability to sue over laws... GeorgiaPeanuts Jun 2016 #15
I guess that is something that can be compromised on bravenak Jun 2016 #16
Yeah when it's negotiated in secret and then fast tracked thjrough Congress Armstead Jul 2016 #137
Yeah, I did not appreciate the secrecy bravenak Jul 2016 #146
I'm fairly certain that no corporation has ever won such a lawsuit under any trade agreement. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #47
At far as I am aware the TPP is the first trade agreement that would allow this GeorgiaPeanuts Jun 2016 #70
The same provisions have been in trade agreements going back to 1959. Where have you been? Hoyt Jun 2016 #112
There are places on the interwebs Maru Kitteh Jul 2016 #135
Then cite something to prove it. treestar Jul 2016 #157
I read here that CHIP would be destroyed by a trade agreement bettyellen Jun 2016 #74
Exactly. There was a poster saying GATS was going to have foreign countries running healthcare here. Hoyt Jul 2016 #152
I do believe the US has already been sued and lost - we all lost - labeling meat in the USA hollysmom Jun 2016 #98
Congress acted to avoid a trade war with Canada. Hoyt Jun 2016 #116
AFTER the US lost the law suit and had to pay millions a day to Mexico and Canada. hollysmom Jun 2016 #118
I'm talking about labeling meat, that was an issue with Canada and Congress acted to avoid Hoyt Jul 2016 #127
If it has legal standards which are followed treestar Jul 2016 #158
Prove that. What are "laws against a corporation?" Impressive sounding treestar Jul 2016 #156
I Agree. srobert Jun 2016 #86
Prove it. treestar Jul 2016 #155
There was another thread on the issue... GeorgiaPeanuts Jul 2016 #160
You have not proved with that post that it is a "carte blanche giveaway treestar Jul 2016 #161
I have to disagree on this. floriduck Jun 2016 #3
That's fine bravenak Jun 2016 #5
I thought you'd be okay with it. Just wanted to go on record. floriduck Jun 2016 #9
TPP-ISDS and the Democrats Arizona Roadrunner Jun 2016 #8
There are many parts that we are going to have to work on, fix, and possibly redo completely bravenak Jun 2016 #13
The TPP can't be revised. It's fixed. Please don't spread misinformation Arazi Jun 2016 #82
New Trade agreements can fix issues bravenak Jun 2016 #83
Nope. TPP will be submitted as currently negotiated. 5 years in the making Arazi Jun 2016 #85
And there will be more trade agreements that will fix any issues caused bravenak Jun 2016 #87
You don't know that. Just like the ACA would be fixed by now right? Lol Arazi Jun 2016 #89
I am not the one screaming 'the sky is falling!' bravenak Jun 2016 #91
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #95
Oh good grief. bravenak Jun 2016 #97
Nothing personal. Strictly TPP ignorance Arazi Jun 2016 #100
they have never fixed this yet. it is in lots of trade deals. hollysmom Jun 2016 #114
Certain things will not be fixed bravenak Jun 2016 #119
like the court system, I am sure the corporations are happy that is written that way hollysmom Jun 2016 #120
Who knew there were more 'neo-' words. Thanks for the revelation, bravenak. n/t pampango Jun 2016 #10
There are just tooooo many these days bravenak Jun 2016 #14
I'm in an honors Politics of Developing Nations and TPP not only will screw the US, but poor nations TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #17
I already know about your poly sci education bravenak Jun 2016 #23
The lobbyist architects of the TPP are surely looking after the developing nation's welfare. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #38
::: bravenak Jun 2016 #39
Lack of nuance is the person who delivers the same predictable messaging each and every day. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #56
Who might that be? bravenak Jun 2016 #60
Which is why China is against it scscholar Jul 2016 #134
Fast Track and TPP: A Recipe for Disaster for Women and LGBT Communities: Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #18
Not all clauses in the TPP are good. katsy Jun 2016 #19
I stated there will be good and bad in every trade deal bravenak Jun 2016 #24
In this case, speaking only for the tpp, it is a travesty. katsy Jun 2016 #34
Trump uses the best words DemFromPittsburgh Jun 2016 #28
all the efforts to diminsih or minimize the use of "neoliberalism" follow the rightwing stupidicus Jun 2016 #20
Some use it to label anything they do not like bravenak Jun 2016 #22
which is why those "some people" do the effort a disservice stupidicus Jun 2016 #26
Posted to for later. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #21
My two cents DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #25
I agree with you bravenak Jun 2016 #31
The world is getting smaller. That scares some people. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #43
Yes it does. bravenak Jun 2016 #44
I'm a Neo Cancer DemFromPittsburgh Jun 2016 #27
Neo pisces here bravenak Jun 2016 #32
Keanu Reeves is just Neo DemFromPittsburgh Jun 2016 #35
... bravenak Jun 2016 #37
LOLZ! Maru Kitteh Jul 2016 #133
Neo libra here~ sheshe2 Jun 2016 #45
Hey!! My mom's a kick ass Libra too! bravenak Jun 2016 #48
Quasi Aquarius Cayenne Jul 2016 #128
K&R! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #29
It is scary bravenak Jun 2016 #33
Oh GOODY!!! New BUZZ Words to try and counter neoliberalism. Exilednight Jun 2016 #30
Thank you, Bravenak! Cha Jun 2016 #36
Glad to see you!!! bravenak Jun 2016 #41
U2! Zap that "neo liberalism" buzzword! Cha Jun 2016 #49
It gets used on anything these days. bravenak Jun 2016 #51
And, it means nothing.. like authoritarian.. just empty buzzwords. Cha Jun 2016 #52
Yep. Like third way. Means nothing anymore at all. Just a word. Empty. bravenak Jun 2016 #53
Details... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #40
Utter fucking bullshit. Get back to me once you've read it. truebrit71 Jun 2016 #42
Everywhere I turn PowerToThePeople Jun 2016 #46
Rightwing nonsense should be alerted if you see it. I alert it. bravenak Jun 2016 #50
Increased trade is in itself neither good nor bad. David__77 Jun 2016 #54
That is how I see it too bravenak Jun 2016 #55
True, but simply disengaging from trade agreements, won't bring the "old jobs back". The factors still_one Jun 2016 #58
Over 150 House Democrats voted against fast tracking the TPP. 190 GOPers voted for it. think Jun 2016 #57
This is not about fast track bravenak Jun 2016 #59
The top House Dem on trade, the unions, the environmental groups, doctors without borders think Jun 2016 #61
They may be Neoreactionary though bravenak Jun 2016 #62
Please explain how the top House Democrat on trade is being neoreactionary on this think Jun 2016 #63
I said MAY bravenak Jun 2016 #64
So you've got nothing but an insulting opinion you can't back up. Got it. Thank you. think Jun 2016 #65
I do not see how it could possibly be insulting bravenak Jun 2016 #66
Of course you don't think Jun 2016 #67
Of course not. I already said that reasoned criticism is warranted. bravenak Jun 2016 #68
Always the case melman Jul 2016 #139
No, it is much more than that. nt silvershadow Jun 2016 #69
Beyond reasoned criticism, yes. That is just kinda what it is. bravenak Jun 2016 #71
I respectfully disagree. nt silvershadow Jun 2016 #72
Exactly DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #75
LGBT groups and AIDS activists oppose the TPP and are being bashed for it here. Typical. Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #73
I don't see Bravenak bashing anyone DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #76
Just....WOW..... Tepid defense of the indefensible...... alittlelark Jun 2016 #77
That's nice bravenak Jun 2016 #84
Hiding behind platitudes... isn't that NICE? Isn't that SPECIAL. alittlelark Jun 2016 #102
Oh, harsh burn! bravenak Jun 2016 #103
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #121
You haven't supported any point with that treestar Jul 2016 #162
Why is Hillary opposed to TPP? bullwinkle428 Jun 2016 #78
She isn't - she loves it and has given speeches about it's merits.... alittlelark Jun 2016 #79
Brava Bravenak Hekate Jun 2016 #80
Hey!!!! bravenak Jun 2016 #81
I disagree with you and the corporate boards which are corporate stacked courts JRLeft Jun 2016 #88
That is how things have been even without the TPP so it cannot be the TPP that caused it bravenak Jun 2016 #94
One reason why our middle class has been decimated is because of JRLeft Jun 2016 #109
how is a trade agreement treestar Jul 2016 #163
The decisions from the tribunals that are stacked with corporate lawyers. JRLeft Jul 2016 #164
WTF? treestar Jul 2016 #165
Reactionaryism and nationalism are of the extreme right AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #90
Remember the horseshoe effect? This is that. bravenak Jun 2016 #92
So if you are against corporate colonialism (TPP) you are a far right extremist? AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #99
I said horse-shoe-effect bravenak Jun 2016 #105
Which means nothing AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #111
OMG..... alittlelark Jun 2016 #108
That's nice bravenak Jun 2016 #113
More platitudes.... Grow up!!! alittlelark Jul 2016 #122
Public Citizen's analysis: snot Jun 2016 #93
Reasoned criticism is fine but much of that seems CT bravenak Jun 2016 #96
Read the fucking tpp katsy Jul 2016 #131
Elizabeth Warren issued a 16-page report documenting all of the broken promises that bullwinkle428 Jun 2016 #101
Yes well this is anonymous internet poster v E Warren! Arazi Jun 2016 #106
Thanks for that link. JEB Jun 2016 #110
That is what I consider reasoned opposition bravenak Jun 2016 #115
there is nothing wrong DonCoquixote Jun 2016 #104
Exactly bravenak Jun 2016 #107
^^^ Nice ^^^ alittlelark Jun 2016 #117
Nope, its climate change denial on steroids riderinthestorm Jul 2016 #123
lol SoLeftIAmRight Jul 2016 #124
Not wanting to have the corporations rule us all is nationalism? AllyCat Jul 2016 #125
We can enforce our laws, that's why Trans-Canada is SOL with the pipeline. If they can support Hoyt Jul 2016 #129
Yeah nothing to worry about. Armstead Jul 2016 #136
Domestic laws still apply. Read the darn agreement and ISDS rules. Hoyt Jul 2016 #153
Neoreactionary really to object to Corporate governance? gordianot Jul 2016 #126
TPP takes away the judicial power of the United States and gives it to The Second Stone Jul 2016 #130
VERY well done! Maru Kitteh Jul 2016 #132
lulz Rex Jul 2016 #138
This OP makes no sense melman Jul 2016 #140
A tiny group on DU don't understand what neo-liberalism means. So they start posting OPs about it. Rex Jul 2016 #141
A tiny group like to call anything they don't like 'neoliberal' bravenak Jul 2016 #143
Well of course they do, you are entitled to your opinion but not facts or reality in this case. Rex Jul 2016 #144
Jesus Fucking Christ, how did I end up at the Weekly Standard? DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2016 #142
No wonder G_j Jul 2016 #145
Neo-Reactionary is just neologism. nt mhatrw Jul 2016 #147
I love neologisms bravenak Jul 2016 #148
You may be resigned to corporate dictatorship, but a lot of us are not. eridani Jul 2016 #149
Succinctly put I hope your comments finally put an end to this silly thread Monk06 Jul 2016 #151
I miss the unrec button. Scuba Jul 2016 #150
Very good treestar Jul 2016 #154
Agreed. bravenak Jul 2016 #166
Or it could be a "kooky" desire for the government that we pay taxes to and the only one we have a TheKentuckian Jul 2016 #159
This place has truly lost its fucking way...Supporting the TPP?! Enjoy your shit sandwich... AzDar Jul 2016 #167
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»TPP hate is just Neo-Nati...»Reply #45