Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why is Bill Clinton bearing all of the blame for Bogus TarmacGate? [View all]NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)59. CDS. It's real. nt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why is Bill Clinton bearing all of the blame for Bogus TarmacGate? [View all]
EffieBlack
Jul 2016
OP
He is a private citizen - he is not a government official and is not bound by government
EffieBlack
Jul 2016
#5
If this was such a problem, the DOJ staff traveling with the AG should have kept the meeting from
EffieBlack
Jul 2016
#21
How many private citizens get Secret Service protection? I want one of those too.
floriduck
Jul 2016
#63
Lots of them. Any Presidential children; and all the ex-Presidents, and their wives. n/t
pnwmom
Jul 2016
#69
For those gifs alone, this is the best post in all of these tarmac-gate posts. Nt.
Else You Are Mad
Jul 2016
#79
He practically ambushed her. He waited on the tarmac when he found out she would be landing there.
morningfog
Jul 2016
#7
"He wasn't stopped" by security is a far cry from "he practically ambushed the plane"
EffieBlack
Jul 2016
#20
Interestingly, Chuck Todd tried to put it into perspective and Scarborough just shouted him down
EffieBlack
Jul 2016
#14
democrats are just as dumb about this. the same week Gowdy finds nothing on Benghazi after spending
La Lioness Priyanka
Jul 2016
#15
The AG did nothing wrong. Bill used poor judgment, but no ethics violation, as far as we know.
morningfog
Jul 2016
#12
The AG allowed the meeting to happen. She's just as culpable as he is - probably more
EffieBlack
Jul 2016
#22
Oh please, who is going to tell Bill he cannot do something? He's special, he was a US President,
monmouth4
Jul 2016
#46
And well schooled in administrative law and ethics, as well. If he wasn't drunk he would've had
JudyM
Jul 2016
#47
Because the extreme right and the extreme left both despise Bill Clinton. eom
MohRokTah
Jul 2016
#24
I am just trying to figure out if I am suppose to be outraged, or if this is just another game so
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#32
In arrogance, sometimes something is done without thought. I am pretty damn sure it is not
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#67
I suspect he was hoping to set case for her recusal since it is my understanding that he
NorthCarolina
Jul 2016
#45
It isn't so much that anything wrong was done, it gives the appearance of an impropriety. I don't
still_one
Jul 2016
#53