Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sorry, but I don't have a problem with Trump's comments on Saddam Hussein. [View all]yellowcanine
(36,822 posts)8. Uh no, Trump was praising Saddam for extra-judicial killing.
But you know what he did well? Mr. Trump said. He killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didnt read them the rights. They didnt talk. They were terrorists. It was over.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/politics/donald-trump-saddam-hussein.html?_r=0
If you don't have a problem with it you should. The fact that invading Iraq was a bad decision doesn't mean we should express admiration of Saddam for being a thug. Opposing the former doesn't mean we have to condone the latter. And by the way, Trump's opposition to the Iraq war appears to be Johnny come lately politically convenient revisionist history. http://www.factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/ So by buying into Trump's statements you are enabling his dishonesty.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/politics/donald-trump-saddam-hussein.html?_r=0
If you don't have a problem with it you should. The fact that invading Iraq was a bad decision doesn't mean we should express admiration of Saddam for being a thug. Opposing the former doesn't mean we have to condone the latter. And by the way, Trump's opposition to the Iraq war appears to be Johnny come lately politically convenient revisionist history. http://www.factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/ So by buying into Trump's statements you are enabling his dishonesty.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sorry, but I don't have a problem with Trump's comments on Saddam Hussein. [View all]
Dawgs
Jul 2016
OP
But it does mean he supported the invasion he now says he did not support, which some here are
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#58
Don't disagree unless you're saying that I claimed that he was always against it. nt
Dawgs
Jul 2016
#73
Hillary supported the invansion, so NO CHANCE that they will disagree with it. nt
Dawgs
Jul 2016
#63
She did NOT - hence the 2002 AUMF Against Iraq. Jeezus, but I thought self-proclaimed Liberals
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#86
welll I guess if supporting Trump and Sadam Hussein is considered progressive and not supporting
DLCWIdem
Jul 2016
#64
I have a BIG problem with him praising a dictator who ruled by terror, for being a great
pampango
Jul 2016
#12
Nowhere in my OP did I suggest that Trump 'calling for torture was virtuous.' . nt
Dawgs
Jul 2016
#82
Is that the appeal of Trump for those that are seeking "revolution" within the Democratic party? nt
LexVegas
Jul 2016
#31
None of my comments have anything to do with the "revolution" or the Democratic party. nt
Dawgs
Jul 2016
#36
Since when was third way neo liberalism/neo conservatism a part of the Democratic Party
runaway hero
Jul 2016
#41
No one has said any such thing. The OP is praising Trump, who was an advocate for invasion of
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#66
Trump fails to realize that Isis is a mutation of the "Elite Republican Guard"
The_Casual_Observer
Jul 2016
#90