Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The big lie: "anyone else would have been prosecuted". [View all]TCJ70
(4,387 posts)106. Hmmm...
Involves classified information? Check.
Classified information ended up where it didn't belong? Check.
Person didn't intend to distribute classified information inappropriately? Check.
Looks very much the same to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Biggest lie... Anyone else would have been prosecuted. As we saw, that isn't the case. Only Clinton
seabeyond
Jul 2016
#1
"Total bullshit. The truth is, nobody else would have even been investigated. And it's not
Cha
Jul 2016
#4
Me, too. Mika was totally unhinged, as was Scar. What a sleazy, lying bunch of lowlifes.
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#14
Not remotely the same thing. That guy didn't mistakenly, 0.1% of the time, send an email
DanTex
Jul 2016
#12
It's definitely the same thing. He had classified information on unsecured devices.
TCJ70
Jul 2016
#32
He intentionally downloaded it onto an unsecured device. And he knew the stuff was
DanTex
Jul 2016
#34
Of course it does. It goes to intent. Like I said in the OP, all high-ranking officials who deal
DanTex
Jul 2016
#40
commercial email accounts are NOT secure. Email service providers have cyber-security personnel who
Bill USA
Jul 2016
#117
Would you be making exactly the same argument if she used official state email?
BzaDem
Jul 2016
#118
Nishimura, downloaded and stored on his personal, unclassified electronic devices
BlueStateLib
Jul 2016
#113
Agreed this was not the same thing. The reservist guy had a classified computer in his office and
politicaljunkie41910
Jul 2016
#112
Why do you bring up this stuff? you expect to get someone to tell you that what you are saying is
insta8er
Jul 2016
#8
LOL. Well, you're apparently trying to tell me it's not true, so if that was my goal,
DanTex
Jul 2016
#9
No not at all, trying to participate in the festivities...and having some fun at those things that
insta8er
Jul 2016
#16
Yes. I am right. So sorry your indictment fairy was killed. At least you get to enjoy a day of
DanTex
Jul 2016
#15
Truth hurts, huh. You reeeeeally wanted that indictment. LOL. Better luck next time.
DanTex
Jul 2016
#20
Nah Dan..only one thing in your "assumption" is right, the truth hurts. Boy if you only knew how.LOL
insta8er
Jul 2016
#22
Your comments are becoming increasingly cryptic. Everything I said in the OP is the truth,
DanTex
Jul 2016
#23
I just disagree with your post. And maybe you overlooked your personal attack on me?
insta8er
Jul 2016
#26
More than you know :) To bad we both have a different thing in mind when it comes to the truth.
insta8er
Jul 2016
#30
I am very much for getting Dems elected, and spare me your faux outrage..next thing you are going to
insta8er
Jul 2016
#33
You mention down-ballot Dems, do you support the Democratic nominee for POTUS?
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#105
"So sorry your indictment fairy was killed" Very selective eh? you didn't see that one?
insta8er
Jul 2016
#36
The Indictment Fairy wasn't killed ... It never existed outside the minds/prayers of the ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#79
Eh..I am responding to his thread? I guess anyone who responds to his tread would
insta8er
Jul 2016
#19
Care to tell us why instead of posting one cryptic insinuendo after another? Spit it out.
brush
Jul 2016
#70
Why bring it up? Did you not watch any news yesterday? It has been a big story since 11 AM.
George II
Jul 2016
#67
What difference does that make? Legal standards don't change based on being a candidate for
DanTex
Jul 2016
#31
Legally, that's the point. Particularly with Trump/Greenwald saying that anyone else would have
DanTex
Jul 2016
#38
Other Secretaries of State who did the same thing weren't even investigated, much less prosecuted.
George II
Jul 2016
#64
Most Americans know this was and still is a witch hunt and corporate media rarely gives
Iliyah
Jul 2016
#71
That's the FOX noise Repuke talking point. Glad to know where you get your info.
Maru Kitteh
Jul 2016
#116
Here's something I don't understand about email, FOIA, and govt record keeping
ContinentalOp
Jul 2016
#107