Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: 10 common objections to Hillary Clinton - and how to counter them [View all]BlueStateLib
(937 posts)25. What destroys that theory is hans blix and un weapons inspectors
If it was a vote for war, why was Iraq invaded by hans blix and un weapons inspectors. Only one person voted NO to war and that was rep barbara lee. Hillary voted for diplomacy not war
Hillary Clinton Floor Speech A.U.M.F. Use of Force Vote
October 10, 2002
While there is no perfect approach to this thorny dilemma, and while people of good faith and high intelligence can reach diametrically opposed conclusions, I believe the best course is to go to the UN for a strong resolution that scraps the 1998 restrictions on inspections and calls for complete, unlimited inspections with cooperation expected and demanded from Iraq.
Even though the resolution before the Senate is not as strong as I would like in requiring the diplomatic route first and placing highest priority on a simple, clear requirement for unlimited inspections, I will take the President at his word that he will try hard to pass a UN resolution and will seek to avoid war, if at all possible.
If we get the resolution and Saddam does not comply, then we can attack him with far more support and legitimacy than we would have otherwise.
October 10, 2002
While there is no perfect approach to this thorny dilemma, and while people of good faith and high intelligence can reach diametrically opposed conclusions, I believe the best course is to go to the UN for a strong resolution that scraps the 1998 restrictions on inspections and calls for complete, unlimited inspections with cooperation expected and demanded from Iraq.
Even though the resolution before the Senate is not as strong as I would like in requiring the diplomatic route first and placing highest priority on a simple, clear requirement for unlimited inspections, I will take the President at his word that he will try hard to pass a UN resolution and will seek to avoid war, if at all possible.
If we get the resolution and Saddam does not comply, then we can attack him with far more support and legitimacy than we would have otherwise.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps if I respond with "Authentic Frontier Gibberish," the censorship squad won't strike!
TheBlackAdder
Jul 2016
#40
ah another Sanders fan chanting his projected intolerance. So much fun to hear ad infinitum
Bill USA
Jul 2016
#10
chanting repetitive recitation of the same statement. Bernie fans have from beginning accused
Bill USA
Jul 2016
#39
Re #8. So Bush lied to her, eh? Did she ever call for Bush's impeachment
KingCharlemagne
Jul 2016
#9
Hey, the moving goalposts are back. First it was because she cast the vote. But she had already
BobbyDrake
Jul 2016
#32
Out of curiosity, did Bernie? If not, then why the double standards? I'd like a source too.
synergie
Jul 2016
#42
Why single her out? Because she's running for President? Now, the first (and second)....
George II
Jul 2016
#43
One correction: single-payer legislation would not cause the ACA to be "removed"
Ken Burch
Jul 2016
#33