Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Ridiculous Jill Stein's Ridiculous Reaction to Sanders Endorsement [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)43. Predictions for 2016
Given the record-high unfavorables of the major-party nominees, I think the minor parties will do better than you project. The Libertarians have a shot at hitting 5% to qualify for federal matching funds. The Greens might well do better than 1% though I'm inclined to think they'll fall short of the 2.74% they got in 2000 with Nader as the nominee.
I further predict that neither will get to 15% in the pre-election polling, and therefore neither will be in the debates.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ridiculous Jill Stein's Ridiculous Reaction to Sanders Endorsement [View all]
Democrats Ascendant
Jul 2016
OP
Any respect I had for this woman was tossed after her Mother's Day comment on Hillary
LynneSin
Jul 2016
#31
She also said that Hillary's first act as president "might" be to start a nuclear war with Russia.
TwilightZone
Jul 2016
#33
Do everyone a favor, cut and paste 3-4 paragraphs of the article with the gist of it into your post
TeamPooka
Jul 2016
#38
She would doom us to Trump if it meant that she could get 5% and continue running...
SaschaHM
Jul 2016
#42