Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
you are right Ken still_one Jul 2016 #1
Our goal is to elect HRC....take back congress....and rid ourselves of beachbumbob Jul 2016 #2
And the way to do that is to run an inspiring, POSITIVE campaign Ken Burch Jul 2016 #3
Hope we do that. However, mud will be slung. Particularly in the local races. GoneOffShore Jul 2016 #12
Positive Vs. Republican SCVDem Jul 2016 #51
I didn't say don't go after Trump. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #62
Sorry! Not my intent. SCVDem Jul 2016 #65
And rightfully so. n/t. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #66
its a message board. people post messages. skinner is the decider on what can be posted. nt msongs Jul 2016 #4
How do you explain why some members here are also members of a Hillary hate site? pnwmom Jul 2016 #5
Interesting question, nt sheshe2 Jul 2016 #8
I suggest Ignore. Raine1967 Jul 2016 #23
Thank you! nolawarlock Jul 2016 #55
What people do on other sites is not our primary concern. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #63
You really need to quit lecturing people on their comportment. And quit trying to censor discussion Squinch Jul 2016 #82
Lol poster just got hidden GusBob Jul 2016 #6
How about.... retrowire Jul 2016 #7
I don't see why criticizing Johnson or Stein is a big deal. DanTex Jul 2016 #9
How can you say her campaign is pro trump? Pharaoh Jul 2016 #19
What can her candidacy possibly accomplish except for electing Trump? DanTex Jul 2016 #22
It can get matching funds for the greens next cycle TheFarseer Jul 2016 #26
So in addition to electing Trump, they can elect more Republicans in the future. DanTex Jul 2016 #28
Yes, and still not elect any Greens this year or any year. nt TheFarseer Jul 2016 #32
Yup. And the thing is, she knows that. You can't get a Harvard MD without being able to add 2 + 2. DanTex Jul 2016 #34
*snicker* nolawarlock Jul 2016 #56
pretty cynical Pharaoh Jul 2016 #27
Truthful is what it is. Can she win? No. Can she help Trump win? Yes. DanTex Jul 2016 #29
I imagine we often rationalize that voting based on conviction is an ethical negative LanternWaste Jul 2016 #84
The conviction of Stein and her voters is "I want Trump to be president". DanTex Jul 2016 #87
How is that cynical? HarmonyRockets Jul 2016 #44
Her attacks on Hillary are a big assist for Trump, as the #2 leading candidate. pnwmom Jul 2016 #30
None. 840high Jul 2016 #38
None of her positions are pro-Trump; her strategy is (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jul 2016 #42
The point should be to make a positive case for OUR nominee... Ken Burch Jul 2016 #31
Can't we both support our nominee and point out the flaws in her competitors? DanTex Jul 2016 #37
What I'm saying is we should FOCUS on going after Trump, rather than minor-party candidates. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #60
The Green Party functions similarly to a GOP SuperPAC. DanTex Jul 2016 #70
We can do both. Make a positive case for OUR nominee and also pnwmom Jul 2016 #40
So lets all just fall into line Pharaoh Jul 2016 #10
Yes, let's. We should all work together to defeat Trump. n/t pnwmom Jul 2016 #14
In this instance yes MidwestTech Jul 2016 #25
Let's work together now for the common good. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #33
He endorsed her but he did not concede 4dsc Jul 2016 #11
If he endorsed her, what difference does it make if he didn't "concede"? Ken Burch Jul 2016 #13
K&R Ken, agreed, we gotta get to WORK DemonGoddess Jul 2016 #16
He conceded -- definitively and without reservation. And then he endorsed her. pnwmom Jul 2016 #17
Thanks for posting that quote. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #35
You're welcome. I appreciated the fact that he was so clear. n//t pnwmom Jul 2016 #36
Yep, sounds like conceding plus endorsing to me! Her Sister Jul 2016 #73
What does that mean? lovemydog Jul 2016 #24
Nothing. bravenak Jul 2016 #41
lol lovemydog Jul 2016 #57
Lol! nolawarlock Jul 2016 #58
Thank you, Ken. calimary Jul 2016 #15
So does that mean we can't feel the Johnson? IronLionZion Jul 2016 #18
I am LITERALLY not touching that. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #21
^^^ This post approved by Notch Johnson , SPF-15 ^^^ TheBlackAdder Jul 2016 #49
That is freaking hilarious. He actually comes off as being very goofy redstateblues Jul 2016 #52
He wears sneakers with a suit IronLionZion Jul 2016 #53
Lets Change The World billhicks76 Jul 2016 #20
I'll still continue to oppose the green party and the libertarians cosmicone Jul 2016 #39
Me too. bettyellen Jul 2016 #43
They don't "take votes away from democrats." eggplant Jul 2016 #50
A fictional television program is proof of your assertion? TwilightZone Jul 2016 #88
My argument is valid on its face. eggplant Jul 2016 #96
The libertarians should draw votes from Republicans IronLionZion Jul 2016 #59
Fine. But we don't need posts designed to bait people here into sounding disloyal Ken Burch Jul 2016 #64
Why come on a democratic board cosmicone Jul 2016 #67
I don't think we have people coming on here to urge votes for minor parties from DU'ers. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #68
Are you saying democrats never came up with any of the great policies cosmicone Jul 2016 #75
This is the language that cannot, will not stand. They are Democratic policies that Democrats seabeyond Jul 2016 #76
Precisely. Thank you. n/t cosmicone Jul 2016 #77
and here come the responses bonemachine Jul 2016 #79
Nothing like one big circle jerk with no dissenting voices. That's the American way!!! Damn right!! ThePhilosopher04 Jul 2016 #45
Have you been to Discussionist? You can have all the dissent your heart desires over there. Hekate Jul 2016 #48
There are people on this site supporting HarmonyRockets Jul 2016 #46
How about supporting Mortimer Snerd? Snerd's the Werd! TheBlackAdder Jul 2016 #47
LOL, "Celebrity Dummies" klook Jul 2016 #69
That's not true. nolawarlock Jul 2016 #54
If they aren't doing it here, it's not our concern. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #61
You are not the arbiter of "our concern." Squinch Jul 2016 #83
Stein went after Clinton harshly. This is a Democratic board. I do not get why you are insisting seabeyond Jul 2016 #71
I agree jcgoldie Jul 2016 #85
Not sheltering...just not wasting time. Ken Burch Jul 2016 #94
This is a board of people that like to think, and discuss. We can do all kinds of things at the seabeyond Jul 2016 #95
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #72
You are insulting Democrats because we get the Green Party is not our friend? seabeyond Jul 2016 #74
Oh do stop lecturing. Codeine Jul 2016 #78
Indeed it is. n/t charlyvi Jul 2016 #80
You ought to quit trying to censor people making legitimate comments about opposition candidates. Squinch Jul 2016 #81
I don't have any problem with people making principled arguments against the Green candidate Ken Burch Jul 2016 #92
If that is your feeling, then by all means avoid it. Clearly others do not feel the same way, and Squinch Jul 2016 #93
attacking Jill Stein and her nonsensical comments hurts only Jill Stein La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #86
I am much more interested in issues than personalities or JEB Jul 2016 #89
Jill Stein is a spineless loon. I'll attack her if I feel like it. NuclearDem Jul 2016 #90
I've supported both nominees since they decided to run for office. Rex Jul 2016 #91
I would rather bait and attack the Republicans myself LostOne4Ever Jul 2016 #97
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie's endorsed HRC...n...»Reply #45