2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Democrats Get Serious About Voting Rights [View all]FighttheFuture
(1,313 posts)Consider this... electronic machines can make it very easy to steal election and flip results.
The older ways you refer to take much more effort, time and concentrated conspiracy to pull off. It does happen, of course. Chicago machine politics did this for quite some time to varying degrees long ago. Stuffing the ballot box. Paying local voters a few bucks to vote a certain way. Etc.
Don Seigleman is a good recent example of election fraud and the failure of electronic voting machines. The election of Wisconsin supreme court election of David Prosser judge is very problematic.
Regardless, I am not here to go into a big discussion of stolen elections, fishy results, exit polls (the gold standard) jsut not working well in this country any more. Maybe you may recall how easy it was for the electronic Machines, shown on air to Howard Dean , some time ago. This and much more is pretty well known at this point if you want to educate yourself. Especially since the crap between 2000 - 2006, when these came into general usage. Do some searches, look at Brad Blog, Truthout. Etc. this isn't new news.
What I am pointing out the electronic voting machines are not to be trusted; they are too error prone, hackable, and really unverifiable. People think they are like their ATM with all teh accounting and security that goes into those, and even those are hacked, but it is traceable/verifable (that accounting thing again). They need to be removed. go back to paper ballots, hand counted with open counting viewable by all. that's just a start.