Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LenaBaby61

(6,991 posts)
27. Uh uh...
Wed Jul 20, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jul 2016

They'll KEEP plunging if those leaning WAY-right Rasmussen, Gravis and Q-polls are thrown in there also.

Rasmussen continues to have tRump at least 7-8 points ahead of her in daily tracking.

PLEASE

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lets see after the conventions are over. bettyellen Jul 2016 #1
This data isn't even taking the convention into account. woolldog Jul 2016 #3
It's taking the Comey smear job into account. And the Dallas police killings pnwmom Jul 2016 #4
Yep, he drilled her good Cosmocat Jul 2016 #43
I think a lot of people weren't certain she was definately the nominee.... bettyellen Jul 2016 #6
538 also said to not get excited over midsummer polls. Hortensis Jul 2016 #25
Long Road citood Jul 2016 #39
Lol giftedgirl77 Jul 2016 #2
Some of this is thanks to Comey, and some just because of the convention MiniMe Jul 2016 #5
And the Dallas Police shootings and the "blue lives matter" people blaming Dems and gun control. pnwmom Jul 2016 #7
I remember thinking of politics like this at one point. NCTraveler Jul 2016 #8
Her chances dropped 17 points. RandySF Jul 2016 #9
Your math is right jcgoldie Jul 2016 #11
Yep. GoCubsGo Jul 2016 #17
The spread went from being +56 Clinton to +23 Clinton woolldog Jul 2016 #12
WTF jcgoldie Jul 2016 #14
I suggest you take a remedial mathematics course. eom MohRokTah Jul 2016 #16
It depends on whose math you are using. KMOD Jul 2016 #13
Uhm jcgoldie Jul 2016 #10
I've noticed you REALLY LOVE posting these negative things. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #15
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #34
I disagree with everything you've said. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #38
She had better get busy, and soon. TheCowsCameHome Jul 2016 #18
Maybe this could help? Kber Jul 2016 #19
Oh, you again. Dem2 Jul 2016 #20
this is concerning! zappaman Jul 2016 #21
Concernucopia! BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #24
Concern noted DesertRat Jul 2016 #22
... Grassy Knoll Jul 2016 #23
it will rise again... chillfactor Jul 2016 #26
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #35
I can't speak for elsewhere, but Hillary's "Trump in his own words" ad John Poet Jul 2016 #40
Uh uh... LenaBaby61 Jul 2016 #27
The 538 model adjusts for those house effects. nt woolldog Jul 2016 #31
You can only.... LenaBaby61 Jul 2016 #44
Should I be worried? Or frightened? Or merely concerned? NurseJackie Jul 2016 #28
Oh boy! Here you go again!! panic attack. book_worm Jul 2016 #29
Hillary's liklihood of winning will go up and down again and again lapucelle Jul 2016 #30
It's the lowest her chances of winning have been since 538 started forecasting this year's election. woolldog Jul 2016 #32
And it's awful numbers. Just awful. nolawarlock Jul 2016 #50
You again? leftofcool Jul 2016 #33
Obama beat Romney by 3.9% jamese777 Jul 2016 #36
The democratic convention is going to make trumps look like amateur hour... dubyadiprecession Jul 2016 #37
And this is relevant........ why? postatomic Jul 2016 #41
You better panic. Squinch Jul 2016 #42
He's already explained why Doctor Jack Jul 2016 #45
I think Camp Clinton is using a light touch now against Trump SticksnStones Jul 2016 #46
hard to take that seriously shireen Jul 2016 #47
The complacency in this thread is very scary. RAFisher Jul 2016 #48
Really? nolawarlock Jul 2016 #49
Wow DemonGoddess Jul 2016 #51
That's good news, actually. No one wants to peak early. stopbush Jul 2016 #52
Email MFM008 Jul 2016 #53
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»According to 538 Clinton'...»Reply #27