Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]Squinch
(52,529 posts)43. I agree, but his proposal for an exemption for the life of the mother, represents
an EXPANSION on the current VA abortion laws, which don't have that exemption.
And the set of laws that has done more to limit women's access to abortions than any other is the bullshit building facility laws. He is saying that he wants to see all those done away with. Thousands of abortion clinics all over the country have closed because of those laws, and he is saying get rid of those laws.
(I presume that this statement was made before the SC ruled against those laws a week or so ago)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You conveniently 'forgot' his pro-choice voting record. That's what makes your post half true.
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#29
I simply do not have a problem with trying to reduce abortions so long as the option to have one is
glennward
Jul 2016
#4
As a now VP candidate who does not determine policy on abortion in any state,
MichiganVote
Jul 2016
#10
Yeah, I get its a policy statement without a link. But what is its relevance?
MichiganVote
Jul 2016
#22
Why does the link page you do provide have a contact source for Kaine's senate page???
MichiganVote
Jul 2016
#33
You should add an option to agree with some of the points and disagree with others.
Nye Bevan
Jul 2016
#13
That's the thing. I DO care about policy, but nothing you listed is relevant
DemonGoddess
Jul 2016
#26
I could not disagree more, but then I believe a woman has a right to control
CharlotteVale
Jul 2016
#37
Which of the policies named in the OP limits a woman's right to control her own body?
Squinch
Jul 2016
#40
Are you kidding me? Partial birth abortion ban limits a woman's righ to control
CharlotteVale
Jul 2016
#41
I agree, but his proposal for an exemption for the life of the mother, represents
Squinch
Jul 2016
#43
Fine, but I'd still want to see what Virginia's restrictions on abortions are, or were at that time
progree
Jul 2016
#46
In this statement, saying he will work to change the restrictions is exactly what he is doing.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#47
How do you know? How do you know what restrictions Virginia had on the books in 2005?
progree
Jul 2016
#48
He wants to get rid of the building restrictions. That is pretty much the thing that has
Squinch
Jul 2016
#49
Long waiting periods that make it harder for poor women. Requiring admitting privileges for doctors
progree
Jul 2016
#51
Enough of this crap! Kaine is the VP pick and damn good one. Like it or LUMP it.
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
#54