Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why didn't Sanders release his delegates? [View all]highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)33. Unity? Surrender on your own terms is what you want, I guess. How about a little give and take?
You don't get to dictate what other people do. And if you'd like them on your side, in the end, it would be good to have a little mutual understanding.
That's what apparently has been happening between Clinton and Sanders camps, and I applaud it. The man earned almost half the vote, and under difficult circumstances.
I thought, in balance, yesterday was a wonderful coming together, despite the glitches. Hope the convention continues to be an inspiring, uniting, uplifting event.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In this case, I think not having a roll call would do more harm than good
democrattotheend
Jul 2016
#21
we have to fret because nothing Sanders does is ever good enough for DU. After Bernie's
merrily
Jul 2016
#37
I don't think so...having bad behavior during a roll call would be worse. NT
Demsrule86
Jul 2016
#46
Let his delegates have their vote. That's the way the process should work.
scheming daemons
Jul 2016
#10
I think she'll want a "swing state" to have the honor. PA, FL, OH, MI, VA, or NC
scheming daemons
Jul 2016
#15
It behooves us all for the Sanders delegates to see that they are part of the selection process and
Attorney in Texas
Jul 2016
#19
This is part of the process to bring them from that fantasy world to the real world. Those few who
Attorney in Texas
Jul 2016
#31
If you're merely Dem- curious, you should learn before making the leap to delegate? Just a thought.
bettyellen
Jul 2016
#73
Democracy is not always predictable. The Republican nominee is a bit of a dabbler
Attorney in Texas
Jul 2016
#76
Hillary's '08 supporters WERE the establishment. They did not need to see confirmation that they
Attorney in Texas
Jul 2016
#34
And yet she was permitted to let that vote roll on to the point that she stopped it.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#41
Unity? Surrender on your own terms is what you want, I guess. How about a little give and take?
highprincipleswork
Jul 2016
#33
He realizes he has to let the deadenders have their moment. If he tried to push them
tblue37
Jul 2016
#36
He's showboating, letting his supporters cling to the fantasy that they can still win.
procon
Jul 2016
#48
It gives the Sanders delegates an opportunity to vote and be part of the process.
LonePirate
Jul 2016
#79
They would allow him to. I think it would have made them even more angry with him. nt
glennward
Jul 2016
#81