Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
33. Unity? Surrender on your own terms is what you want, I guess. How about a little give and take?
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 11:06 AM
Jul 2016

You don't get to dictate what other people do. And if you'd like them on your side, in the end, it would be good to have a little mutual understanding.

That's what apparently has been happening between Clinton and Sanders camps, and I applaud it. The man earned almost half the vote, and under difficult circumstances.

I thought, in balance, yesterday was a wonderful coming together, despite the glitches. Hope the convention continues to be an inspiring, uniting, uplifting event.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What good would that do? democrattotheend Jul 2016 #1
It's going to create more drama and divisiveness. That's why sufrommich Jul 2016 #3
Right.. speaktruthtopower Jul 2016 #7
In this case, I think not having a roll call would do more harm than good democrattotheend Jul 2016 #21
we have to fret because nothing Sanders does is ever good enough for DU. After Bernie's merrily Jul 2016 #37
Bernie was great last night. He is going to work hard for the GE, including tblue37 Jul 2016 #38
Sure, but this morning, he's a problem again. It never gets old, either. merrily Jul 2016 #40
++ cyberpunk Jul 2016 #71
I don't think so...having bad behavior during a roll call would be worse. NT Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #46
It would show he's a good sport and a team player, instead of Lil Missy Jul 2016 #65
He asked for a roll call vote and it was granted. leftofcool Jul 2016 #2
Yep. Letting them vote at the party's convention makes them Democrats... Orsino Jul 2016 #55
Hope springs eternal. MoonRiver Jul 2016 #4
Clinton is still going to be the nominee regardless. bigwillq Jul 2016 #5
I don't see the harm, his delegates need to see geek tragedy Jul 2016 #6
Hillary stopped the roll call vote in 2008 in the spirit of unity. sufrommich Jul 2016 #9
He may do the same thing tonight. geek tragedy Jul 2016 #13
Doing what Hillary did in 2008 might backfire democrattotheend Jul 2016 #23
Probably. As I noted above, the need to see the vote geek tragedy Jul 2016 #27
Precisely. nt tblue37 Jul 2016 #39
I think it is being done to honor Sanders, and then avaistheone1 Jul 2016 #8
This. n/t backscatter712 Jul 2016 #17
Let his delegates have their vote. That's the way the process should work. scheming daemons Jul 2016 #10
I think it will be New York. nt sufrommich Jul 2016 #12
I think she'll want a "swing state" to have the honor. PA, FL, OH, MI, VA, or NC scheming daemons Jul 2016 #15
I wonder why Hillary was not HONORED in this way 2008? fun n serious Jul 2016 #11
She didn't want it. Unity was more important than sufrommich Jul 2016 #14
Priorities vs vanities. NurseJackie Jul 2016 #20
It isn't divisive. avaistheone1 Jul 2016 #29
I don't remember her needing to be cradled like this.... fun n serious Jul 2016 #59
It isn't cradling. It is a small gesture. avaistheone1 Jul 2016 #61
I don't think Hillary is the one who is crying,, fun n serious Jul 2016 #63
It was her choice. She decided to be the good soldier. scheming daemons Jul 2016 #16
She was democrattotheend Jul 2016 #70
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #18
It behooves us all for the Sanders delegates to see that they are part of the selection process and Attorney in Texas Jul 2016 #19
Except a few are in a fantasy world where they don't realize it is over... bettyellen Jul 2016 #22
This is part of the process to bring them from that fantasy world to the real world. Those few who Attorney in Texas Jul 2016 #31
If you're merely Dem- curious, you should learn before making the leap to delegate? Just a thought. bettyellen Jul 2016 #73
Sometimes the newly converted have the most fervor Attorney in Texas Jul 2016 #74
I don't think delegates should be dabbling a bit. bettyellen Jul 2016 #75
Democracy is not always predictable. The Republican nominee is a bit of a dabbler Attorney in Texas Jul 2016 #76
Hear ye. Those young folks are the future of the party avaistheone1 Jul 2016 #25
I agree with you democrattotheend Jul 2016 #26
Do you understand why Hillary stopped the roll call halfway through it? sufrommich Jul 2016 #28
But she's a Democrat bluedye33139 Jul 2016 #32
BINGO. auntpurl Jul 2016 #67
Hillary's '08 supporters WERE the establishment. They did not need to see confirmation that they Attorney in Texas Jul 2016 #34
And yet she was permitted to let that vote roll on to the point that she stopped it. Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #41
I find this to be admirable and think it will help bring about closure. NCTraveler Jul 2016 #24
This! Inspired Jul 2016 #78
Because he knows the BoBs won't sit down and shut up kestrel91316 Jul 2016 #30
Unity? Surrender on your own terms is what you want, I guess. How about a little give and take? highprincipleswork Jul 2016 #33
Because he wants to hear his name called out 50 more times frazzled Jul 2016 #35
More importantly, his supporters want to hear it democrattotheend Jul 2016 #45
As Bertolt Brecht wrote frazzled Jul 2016 #52
If he had endorsed a month ago, it would not have helped democrattotheend Jul 2016 #54
You clearly know nothing, pangaia Jul 2016 #60
He realizes he has to let the deadenders have their moment. If he tried to push them tblue37 Jul 2016 #36
Holy Shxt, I can't believe this is even an issue. WTF? floriduck Jul 2016 #42
They are going to raise a ruckus Motley13 Jul 2016 #43
Rumor was, he was going to... Adrahil Jul 2016 #44
I would want to if I were a delegate democrattotheend Jul 2016 #47
Well, I think it's pointless at this point.... Adrahil Jul 2016 #58
He's showboating, letting his supporters cling to the fantasy that they can still win. procon Jul 2016 #48
Nothing he does will ever be good enough for some of you democrattotheend Jul 2016 #49
I know right? 'Unity for thee, but not for me'... PoutrageFatigue Jul 2016 #53
He's a politician. He lost. I don't owe him a thing, yeah? procon Jul 2016 #57
Right now there is a roll call vote scheduled for tonight Gothmog Jul 2016 #50
Vanity and ego. nt BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #51
Sanders supporters need to feel their voices (and their votes) count. Tatiana Jul 2016 #56
One might question the judgement of a candidate demanding yet another vote stopbush Jul 2016 #62
Give them a chance to cast their vote for Sanders. Agnosticsherbet Jul 2016 #64
I am totally fine with the roll call vote. Justice Jul 2016 #66
Enough coddling of these impossible-to-please Sanders people. Paladin Jul 2016 #68
I say let him keep them as a consolation prize MyNameGoesHere Jul 2016 #69
i think because some of his supporters would have not went along JI7 Jul 2016 #72
He's keeping his word. panader0 Jul 2016 #77
It gives the Sanders delegates an opportunity to vote and be part of the process. LonePirate Jul 2016 #79
My guess is that it's to "offset" the Russian hack... VOX Jul 2016 #80
They would allow him to. I think it would have made them even more angry with him. nt glennward Jul 2016 #81
I agree democrattotheend Jul 2016 #82
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why didn't Sanders releas...»Reply #33