Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
She said that after she read the final product, that she was against it. tonyt53 Jul 2016 #1
I'm looking for a quote so I can persuade some people. grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #3
She said she's against it. onecaliberal Jul 2016 #2
Anything better than this: grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #4
It's a slow start, but the right direction. Orsino Jul 2016 #5
hear here! I second this post ^^^ Jack Bone Jul 2016 #6
It's the best I could find. onecaliberal Jul 2016 #9
I found this: grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #10
I saw rep Debbie Dingell on CNN this morning and she strongly defended onecaliberal Jul 2016 #11
ID like to find her stating she is against the TPP, not that grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #13
I don't get your point. Adrahil Jul 2016 #16
That is my point. It's easy for either party to say they oppose it as it is currently written. As it grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #19
I'm guessing most people have no idea... Adrahil Jul 2016 #21
It's not hard. Alexander Hamilton set up a system whereby any foreign made goods were taxed to the grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #22
Of course there's wiggle room. There should be. DanTex Jul 2016 #14
Disagree. The fundamental philosophy behind the TPP is that of neoliberal trade policies, grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #17
There has to be trade policy. Which means that we should ratify good trade agreements and DanTex Jul 2016 #18
We're against it because it's a neoliberal trade policy, and should be ratified as a treaty, grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #20
What does that mean: "it's a neoliberal trade policy." DanTex Jul 2016 #24
Here's a general overview: grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #25
TPP has nothing to do with any of that, per se. It's about trade rules. DanTex Jul 2016 #26
You must agree that grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #28
Of course not. DanTex Jul 2016 #30
lol, it's not arbitration when the corporations own the courts. grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #31
She really doesn't have a strong statement against it. Tatiana Jul 2016 #7
I'd like to find that statement the questioner is referencing grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #8
Coming up empty. Tatiana Jul 2016 #12
The statement is roughly that she will not support the agreement if it does not lead to an increase grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #15
Here is is goldent Jul 2016 #29
I thought this was a relatively strong statement against it: Chathamization Jul 2016 #23
Excellent! Thank you! This is perfect! grahamhgreen Jul 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Anybody got Hillary's str...»Reply #6