I don't like Jill Stein or support the Green "spoiler strategy" but let's be honest about it.

[intersectionality]

125. This is a reactive sentiment and not a proactive sentiment

Blame is a one way street that absolves you of accountability, so keep parading around like Nader caused W's presidency and not that Dems didn't run a stronger campaign. Very 2012-Rovian analysis of how elections work, imo. Hope your analysis leads to more realistic predictions than turd blossom because otherwise it's just qq all the time about a decade and a half ago. Not "we should not let this happen," not "we can do better next time," but a continual gnashing of teeth. Do something or stop whining, but screaming Nader at the top of your lungs every time this is mentioned makes it look like you have a limited understanding of elections. We all know what the end was, but if you continuously refuse to examine the means then you probably should butt out of the conversation.