Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(15,456 posts)

2. Yes, her use of "girl" is pointed. I agree...

Tue Aug 9, 2016, 07:49 PM

Aug 2016

... that the sense of her comment is not directed at Rachel. But her use of "girl" is.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Elizabeth Warren sticks it to Rachel Maddow yet again. [View all] LAS14 Aug 2016 OP

warrens comments have nothing to do with Rachel maddow JI7 Aug 2016 #1

Yes, her use of "girl" is pointed. I agree... LAS14 Aug 2016 #2

How do you know? Did you see the Warren/Maddow... LAS14 Aug 2016 #4

It had nothing to do with Maddow... HipChick Aug 2016 #5

In a complex world, a statement can have multiple.. LAS14 Aug 2016 #7

Saw nothing but tend to agree. Warren's focused, Hortensis Aug 2016 #11

See my replies above. I didn't say it wasn't against Trump!! LAS14 Aug 2016 #8

Warren is great. Ace Rothstein Aug 2016 #10