2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Damning Hillary Clinton with Faint Praise [View all]stupidicus
(2,570 posts)who insist that everyone stay silent despite the consent that implies, because apparently you think the people you support and you simply aren't up to the task of rebutting the objections and/or concerns, or in the less flattering alternative the poster above suggested, you wish to put on appearances of what is tantamount to blind subservience rivaling that of trumpheads in lieu of addressing those objections and concerns.
Gee, how did HC resond to BS's criticisms? Oh that's right, she tried to blunt them by changing her pov, making herself more palatable/acceptable to the doubters. Given that, it seems to me that your proposal and way of doing things is counterproductive, resulting in far less votes in the end than your censorship could ever hope to.
THis is the same bs peddled the last election, and it is little more than an effort that gives life to a self-fulfilling prophecy and as a means of blaming those with objections and concerns for whatever losses that arise, as opposed to giving your censorship and tactics of like kind the role they deserve as the offputting, "you're either COMPLETELY with us or against us" bs that they are.