2016 Postmortem

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,509 posts) Tue Aug 30, 2016, 09:08 PM Aug 2016

Memo to Tim Canova: If you're running for the Democratic nomination.... [View all]

...you might want to try stumping for votes at places other than Joyce Kaufman's (Trump 2016/hang the immigrants/ballots then bullets) radio show.

Truly idiotic. Good riddance.

100 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Memo to Tim Canova: If you're running for the *Democratic* nomination.... [View all] Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2016 OP

Vanity campaigns weren't just for Republicans this year. nt BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #1

Vanity and spite. Not a winning combination to run a campaign on. misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #8

He was all over his district and to all of the Century Villages. No good riddance I hope. We need monmouth4 Aug 2016 #2

+1 liberalnarb Aug 2016 #45

+1 JudyM Aug 2016 #48

But why Joyce Kaufman's show? Three times? Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2016 #67

He'll never be DNC material.... think Aug 2016 #3

He's not quite enough of a corporitist, I guess. davsand Aug 2016 #4

Perhaps that's our problem? What happens if the base and happydaze Aug 2016 #16

You can't even spell your meaningless bullshit jargon term correctly emulatorloo Aug 2016 #19

. . . . . . Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #80

. NCTraveler Sep 2016 #100

Apparently DWS was not DNC material either. liberalnarb Aug 2016 #46

I get real tired of being called a corporatist ehrnst Aug 2016 #73

You mean DLC material, somehow you pit an N in there. Exilednight Aug 2016 #10

Still going on about that, are we? Bloody hell! Give it a rest, won't ya? NurseJackie Aug 2016 #13

The Clinton Foundation bought the record archives... think Aug 2016 #14

Good for them! NurseJackie Aug 2016 #15

What do you want? The records to be shredded so you can fabricate a Conspiracy Theory? emulatorloo Aug 2016 #30

Did you have any factual information to add to the conversation? There are plenty of facts. No one think Aug 2016 #54

Your guy lost, Loki Aug 2016 #60

DWS used the DNC to help her campaign against Canova. think Aug 2016 #63

No, it's not that I don't care, Loki Aug 2016 #68

Did DWS use the DNC against the rules to help her win? think Aug 2016 #69

Your opinion. Loki Aug 2016 #70

My opinion? The emails showed them coordinating against Canova. Those are facts. think Aug 2016 #71

No, I am a fucking idiot and you are the only intelligent one on DU emulatorloo Sep 2016 #99

Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #18

More concerned about Tea Party Republicans than a defunct rotary club for Dems emulatorloo Aug 2016 #22

You haven't noticed, they don't care here. ciaobaby Aug 2016 #40

Just because they don't exist on paper doesn't mean they don't exist in practice. Exilednight Aug 2016 #53

What's a "revolution" without some "boogeyman" hiding in the shadows, eh? NurseJackie Aug 2016 #66

Your ad hominem attack just proves your ignorance of the facts. Exilednight Aug 2016 #76

Like chemtrails? (nt) ehrnst Aug 2016 #78

Oogah boogah. DLC went our of business a long time ago emulatorloo Aug 2016 #20

No, they just took down the signs and went dark. platitudipus Aug 2016 #24

More worried about Teaparty Republicans than a defunct "ideology" emulatorloo Aug 2016 #27

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2016 #34

You're welcome! Cool you are here! emulatorloo Aug 2016 #35

NO WE DON'T!!!!!!!!!! KMOD Aug 2016 #36

.... emulatorloo Aug 2016 #38

Well poo sticks! Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #85

People can have plenty of differnet view points Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #58

Like the DLC, the poster you reply to here is also no longer Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #86

~o~ NurseJackie Aug 2016 #12

Good riddance is correct. misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #5

+1 oasis Aug 2016 #7

She brings more to the table than Canova could. Apparently the voters knew that too. NurseJackie Aug 2016 #17

Sure! misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #23

K&R! stonecutter357 Aug 2016 #6

Progressive" has been a party, a description and a hat. Nobody knows who's wearing it now. n/t splat Aug 2016 #9

Which is why I've never been afraid or ashamed to stand by the word "liberal." BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #11

Omg..haaahaaa misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #39

Tell me about it - I have been excluded from the term "true progressive'" ehrnst Aug 2016 #74

A lot of people affecting the term are terribly intolerant. MADem Aug 2016 #87

Canova will be endorsing his opponent...right? brooklynite Aug 2016 #21

Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #28

Bernie's been honored, except by the ignorant BOB's who never gave a shit about Bernie in the first emulatorloo Aug 2016 #33

"Bernie's been honored, except by the ignorant BOB's who never gave a shit about Bernie in the first JudyM Aug 2016 #49

The Bernie Treatment??? KMOD Aug 2016 #41

He's going to get a third house? BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #55

... greatauntoftriplets Aug 2016 #64

Who was it that couldn't endorse Democratic House candidates in their area do to GOP think Aug 2016 #29

It's different when a "DLC/BlueDog/"New"Democrat/Third Way/Rockefeller Republican" dflprincess Aug 2016 #43

I live in Broward county, I didn't see 1 tv commercial for Canova until about 2 days ago. jg10003 Aug 2016 #25

I've wondered that same thing. Especially this election with so many running as misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #37

Memo to Debbie Wasserman Schultz: If you're running for the *Democratic* nomination.... Gore1FL Aug 2016 #26

Umm..she just beat that stranger Cannova. misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #31

Yeah she does. Gore1FL Aug 2016 #51

Being this petty and spiteful is what holds progressives back, seriously. BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #56

What holds progressives back is people who claim to hold Exilednight Aug 2016 #57

Litmus tests and being required to walk lockstep is what differentiates a ehrnst Aug 2016 #77

Everyone has a litmus test. Exilednight Aug 2016 #84

There is a particular definition of litmus test ehrnst Aug 2016 #88

it just reinforces my statement. If someone doesn't have a litmus test, then Exilednight Aug 2016 #93

And you are reinforcing my statement... ehrnst Sep 2016 #95

One of your sentences sums it all up for me. Exilednight Sep 2016 #97

Not my sentence - but "Enforcing strict adherence to ideology" was what it was actuallyreferring to. ehrnst Sep 2016 #98

DWS supported usury and GOP candidates in Florida. Gore1FL Aug 2016 #61

I guess looking at her total record would be too much work, huh? BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #62

Please share the issues that make her awesome in your eyes. Gore1FL Aug 2016 #65

Here. Educate yourself, maybe. BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #72

I am capable of looking up her record. I am critical of it. I gave examples and everything. Gore1FL Aug 2016 #90

You make me laugh, actually. SO MUCH projection, my god. BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #91

Projection? You seem to be putting words and motives into my mouth. Gore1FL Aug 2016 #94

Not all candidates require adoration, nor voters messiahs. ehrnst Aug 2016 #81

That never was my way of looking at it. Gore1FL Aug 2016 #89

I'm a progressive and I don't support usury and GOP candidates. ehrnst Sep 2016 #96

Happy for DWS. Thinkingabout Aug 2016 #32

That's right! No talking to right-wingers for any reason! stranger81 Aug 2016 #42

I see what you did there dflprincess Aug 2016 #44

Except with Kaufman it was more than just an endorsement. Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2016 #52

And there goes the end of this truly idiotic proxy battle. SaschaHM Aug 2016 #47

Plenty of openings at Our Revolution right now. (nt) ehrnst Aug 2016 #82

They announced the new board filled with Bernie regulars like Shailene Woodly and Nina Turner. SaschaHM Aug 2016 #83

So they're just openly trying to tank the effort now, then? BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #92

kick & recommended. William769 Aug 2016 #50

With an attitude like this, I wish he'd lost by more: George II Aug 2016 #59

Excellent advice. But ... NurseJackie Aug 2016 #75

Yes, because anyone who is with them 99.99% of the time ehrnst Aug 2016 #79