2016 Postmortem

onehandle

(51,122 posts)

1. Have you ever seen the news? It's Trump propping and Clinton bashing, 24/7.

Reply to agnostic102 (Original post)

Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:07 PM

Sep 2016

Last edited Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:55 PM - Edit history (1)

They couldn't be more 'turned' on her.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dont be surprised if the press turns on clinton soon [View all] agnostic102 Sep 2016 OP

Have you ever seen the news? It's Trump propping and Clinton bashing, 24/7. onehandle Sep 2016 #1

yeah martin mike Sep 2016 #44

I check the post counts when issues of concerns pop up nolabels Sep 2016 #47

I never noticed they ever turned for Clinton. The media is going to put that asshole in the doc03 Sep 2016 #2

doc agnostic102 Sep 2016 #3

Usually Hillary looks very good for a lady her age but yesterday must have been one of those doc03 Sep 2016 #8

der drumpfenfuhrer won the day? granted he got unlimited coverage for his insanity. . . niyad Sep 2016 #14

Well there is nothing I can say other than she looked just great or I will doc03 Sep 2016 #16

you already said she looked awful. the question is, what is awful about her appearance niyad Sep 2016 #18

In that video she just looks plain tired. I am about the same age and know I doc03 Sep 2016 #25

people of even the exact same age do not necessarily have the same physical limitations. niyad Sep 2016 #37

You could just say you didn't care for her hair and admit that you're using sexist standards, synergie Sep 2016 #20

Who said Trump didn't look like a corpse with orange makeup and doc03 Sep 2016 #26

Your posts suggests that her hair lends credence to all the attacks on her health. synergie Sep 2016 #40

"Looks very good for a lady her age"? cwydro Sep 2016 #33

No he did not win the day and Hillary looked just fine. Demsrule86 Sep 2016 #35

I know.. concerning isn't it? . . n/t annabanana Sep 2016 #32

Fixated on a female candidate's looks? BobbyDrake Sep 2016 #11

Yes, of course. They want a horse race, and they certainly don't want JCanete Sep 2016 #4

You mean they haven't yet? BlueInPhilly Sep 2016 #5

You have a friend who told you that the press is anti-Trump and pro-Clinton Democat Sep 2016 #6

^^this^^ . . . . . n/t annabanana Sep 2016 #31

What year did this happen? Wellstone ruled Sep 2016 #7

It truly looked like the other way round, he was standing funny while the president berated him synergie Sep 2016 #21

Just came back from a look at H-Post, Wellstone ruled Sep 2016 #24

Soon... Mike Nelson Sep 2016 #9

+1 JoePhilly Sep 2016 #43

Are you kidding? DURHAM D Sep 2016 #10

good point agnostic102 Sep 2016 #12

You seem to have missed the last thirty years. NCTraveler Sep 2016 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author niyad Sep 2016 #15

Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #22

They haven't for the past several months? LiberalFighter Sep 2016 #17

Wen have they been for her? we can do it Sep 2016 #19

You mean relayerbob Sep 2016 #23

You are 24 years late molova Sep 2016 #27

Soon???? tavernier Sep 2016 #28

They don't have to turn, they were never on Team Clinton from the start. No worries here. nt Tarheel_Dem Sep 2016 #29

media is currently in 24/7 troll mode . "What does she NEED to do?" annabanana Sep 2016 #30

concern concern and more concern Demsrule86 Sep 2016 #36

how will i know the difference? 0rganism Sep 2016 #34

Turns on her? They've never been with her. Their double arthritisR_US Sep 2016 #38

yawn... brooklynite Sep 2016 #39

IF?? DFW Sep 2016 #41

Turn on her soon? workinclasszero Sep 2016 #42

Soon? Mz Pip Sep 2016 #45

If they turn on her, that means they'll start reporting positive stuff. Vinca Sep 2016 #46