Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mnhtnbb

(33,286 posts)
33. No. He was confirming his signature on a document.
Sun Oct 2, 2016, 10:13 AM
Oct 2016

On Wednesday, The Times presented the tax documents to Jack Mitnick, a lawyer and certified public accountant who handled Mr. Trump’s tax matters for more than 30 years, until 1996. Mr. Mitnick was listed as the preparer on the New Jersey tax form.

Mr. Mitnick, 80, now semiretired and living in Florida, said that while he no longer had access to Mr. Trump’s original returns, the documents appeared to be authentic copies of portions of Mr. Trump’s 1995 tax returns. Mr. Mitnick said the signature on the tax preparer line of the New Jersey tax form was his, and he readily explained an obvious anomaly in the way especially large numbers appeared on the New
York tax document.

A flaw in the tax software program he used at the time prevented him from being able to print a nine-figure loss on Mr. Trump’s New York return, he said. So, for example, the loss of “-915,729,293” on Line 18 of the return printed out as “5,729,293.” As a result, Mr. Mitnick recalled, he had to use his typewriter to manually add the “-91,” thus explaining why the first two digits appeared to be in a different font and were slightly misaligned from the following seven digits.

“This is legit,” he said, stabbing a finger into the document.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No sympathy for the Trump team. saltpoint Oct 2016 #1
its all damage control and the fact it came from some one inside of Trump 's corporation is SWEET beachbum bob Oct 2016 #2
Like hacking with the help of a foreign entity? Iliyah Oct 2016 #3
Got 'em. FailureToCommunicate Oct 2016 #23
Damage control. Too late. Buzz Clik Oct 2016 #4
What's really intriguing (and delicious) to me is: Who leaked it? PearliePoo2 Oct 2016 #5
My money is on Marla Kber Oct 2016 #9
Or Tiffany or any of the many employees who spooky3 Oct 2016 #22
Yeah, there's been that speculation but oh man... PearliePoo2 Oct 2016 #26
Wonder if those are the same "investigators" he sent to Hawaii japple Oct 2016 #31
Yes, absolutely! He's got his two BEST guys on it! PearliePoo2 Oct 2016 #40
probably didn't pay them rurallib Oct 2016 #42
yes, Marla... alterfurz Oct 2016 #48
Trump will have to sue a hell of a lot saltpoint Oct 2016 #6
"Should keep Michael Cohen real busy for some time." tblue37 Oct 2016 #46
LOL! tblue37, that is a saltpoint Oct 2016 #49
Like Wikileaks? Kber Oct 2016 #7
That's different because...CLINTON IS EVIL! randome Oct 2016 #10
No, Wikileaks has focused on hurting Clinton this election cycle. And NEVER discloses KittyWampus Oct 2016 #21
Complains about papers reporting on an "illegally" obtained document. SaschaHM Oct 2016 #8
He has pissed off so many employees over the past 45 years BumRushDaShow Oct 2016 #11
So were the DNC emails.... Wounded Bear Oct 2016 #12
Melania leaked it Johnny2X2X Oct 2016 #13
I have been using #DeadbeatDonald all morning on Twitter Persondem Oct 2016 #14
Trump sent it to the press. Sunlei Oct 2016 #15
If this came from someone in the Trump saltpoint Oct 2016 #16
Trump needs to check with his Russian hackers, maybe Trump made a miscue and Thinkingabout Oct 2016 #17
The newspaper has verified with the accountant who prepared them that they 'look' like the real mnhtnbb Oct 2016 #24
I would believe it is a true return, good judgement by Trump in his business deals, he should not Thinkingabout Oct 2016 #27
If he was my accountant I would get a new accountant exboyfil Oct 2016 #32
No. He was confirming his signature on a document. mnhtnbb Oct 2016 #33
For a document that was released without authorization of his client exboyfil Oct 2016 #35
The guy is also a lawyer--according to the NY Times article. mnhtnbb Oct 2016 #39
At age 80, he might not be all that worried about long-term consequences for himself, but still tblue37 Oct 2016 #47
Typewriter,reminds me of ............ mrmpa Oct 2016 #41
Now they f*cking care about leaks/hacks Madam45for2923 Oct 2016 #18
Tis true, dammit, but he is the greatest. Thinkingabout Oct 2016 #28
So, just to review: saltpoint Oct 2016 #19
Sounds like Meredith McIver!!! Madam45for2923 Oct 2016 #37
: ) saltpoint Oct 2016 #38
k&r for your flawless logic! Rose Siding Oct 2016 #20
So DonTheCon thinks it's wrong for his information to be obtained without his permission, but... -Steph- Oct 2016 #25
What adds Hilarity to this Gymbo Oct 2016 #29
Yep. The depositions would be a hoot! nt SunSeeker Oct 2016 #36
Well, Donald, you should have thought about that when DNC documents were leaked. mfcorey1 Oct 2016 #30
My ESPat work rickford66 Oct 2016 #34
Logic? We don't need no stinking logic. Beowulf42 Oct 2016 #43
Ha ha ha ha ha ha - thats just too rich. marble falls Oct 2016 #44
You can't stiff your accountants bucolic_frolic Oct 2016 #45
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"The only news here is th...»Reply #33