2016 Postmortem

Response to meadowlark5 (Original post)

Post removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Two electors say they won't vote for Hillary [View all] meadowlark5 Nov 2016 OP

Stupid caucus state. LisaM Nov 2016 #1

Blame the state party leaders for that Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2016 #28

That is true... LisaM Nov 2016 #41

Why the fuck do we give activists these positions? Zynx Nov 2016 #2

Agree! Why the fuck are activists chosen as EC voters? Needs to be given to professions. RAFisher Nov 2016 #27

Honestly, we should just give the positions to elected officials or big donors. Loyal and sound Zynx Nov 2016 #29

exactly, to superdelegates, basically. /nt radius777 Nov 2016 #60

Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #3

Yes permanent damage TrekLuver Nov 2016 #5

I agree, and Weaver. radius777 Nov 2016 #23

Yes, alt-left, misoginist, entitled white men that also often xenophobes too. Foggyhill Nov 2016 #33

To be fair, te one who absolutely won't ote for Hillary is a Native American. bornskeptic Nov 2016 #43

the criticism still mostly applies, and shits such as this guy are a symptom radius777 Nov 2016 #50

Seriously stop fighting the primary. Bernie is campaigning his heart out all over the country, for onecaliberal Nov 2016 #64

These petty little shits need a personal phone call from Sanders Maru Kitteh Nov 2016 #35

Word. *fist bump* n/t VOX Nov 2016 #53

I don't understand that they don't have to abide by the will of the people? So these two TrekLuver Nov 2016 #4

Generally people follow their duty Worktodo Nov 2016 #59

We will see about that... Blue Idaho Nov 2016 #7

They are traitors and needed for be banned from the Democratic Party for life. RAFisher Nov 2016 #9

They will be taking away the voice of nearly a million people!!! Sick fuckers Foggyhill Nov 2016 #12

+1000 smirkymonkey Nov 2016 #68

Charge them with fraud. nt SunSeeker Nov 2016 #13

Nasty women in Washington need to call them. LiberalFighter Nov 2016 #14

Of course they are men. What a bunch of selffish, selfcentered ASSHOLES. They aren't still_one Nov 2016 #15

They should be cited for public masturbation Orrex Nov 2016 #17

I hope there is plenty of pressure put on them treestar Nov 2016 #19

No, this is not a new thing "the first time it's a woman" Jim Lane Nov 2016 #73

Fuck the caucus system. Dawson Leery Nov 2016 #24

the caucus system is elitist and non-democratic, radius777 Nov 2016 #44

BernieBusters insulted me for pointing out Bernie was only competitive because of caucuses.. JHan Nov 2016 #58

The caucus is ONLY in place here because it's much less expensive than primaries. We need funding. Turn CO Blue Nov 2016 #69

If it swings the election these people are as good as Dem2 Nov 2016 #25

they think they're above listening to a million voters, and stomping out their voices? Divine Discontent Nov 2016 #26

Can these two men throw the whole election result???? bdamomma Nov 2016 #31

Yes, it's theoretically possible. LisaL Nov 2016 #36

I really don't think there will be a tie or near tie in the EC... Wounded Bear Nov 2016 #38

Faithless Electors jamese777 Nov 2016 #39

So, the Virginia electors were against Johnson's "long-term interracial relationship BlueProgressive Nov 2016 #75

Yes. Bush 'won' in 2000 with exactly 270 electoral votes. Drunken Irishman Nov 2016 #80

Bernie Sanders should personally call this man and tell him beachbum bob Nov 2016 #37

Exactly Rocknrule Nov 2016 #76

Self centered, arrogant jackasses. ecstatic Nov 2016 #40

I hope he's dead on the water with the Dems in his state for this Bucky Nov 2016 #47

All candidates falling short of 270 electors jamese777 Nov 2016 #42

Trump's bar is 270, but now Clinton's is 272 Bucky Nov 2016 #45

The Electoral College is and has been a check and balance on elections Kathy M Nov 2016 #46

Robert Satiacum's FB page says he's born in Chile and lives in Australia VOX Nov 2016 #52

Ran across this article where Satiacum is member of Kathy M Nov 2016 #67

I don't care if he cured cancer. He has no *moral* right to overturn the will of voters. Zynx Nov 2016 #70

When Trump loses, I can easily see him going after electors... VOX Nov 2016 #48

His ass is grass in the party vlyons Nov 2016 #51

If that elector threw it to Trump he could go down in history as the man who destroyed America MattP Nov 2016 #54

BFD - she won't need them. nt jonno99 Nov 2016 #61

According to Washington State law lapucelle Nov 2016 #63

Look at me! Look at me! yardwork Nov 2016 #65

well maybe the people of this state MFM008 Nov 2016 #66

"maybe it'll wake this country up" book_worm Nov 2016 #71

It's useless if it doesn't come down to 270... Drunken Irishman Nov 2016 #82

Fucking wow uponit7771 Nov 2016 #72

He should be removed. One of the 99 Nov 2016 #74

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2016 #79

How does this work? autumn herons Nov 2016 #81

The state can remove them and probably will. nt fleabiscuit Nov 2016 #89

Dec 1969 #