Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)

3. Crosscheck goes back years, not something specific to this election. Plus,

Reply to s-cubed (Original post)

Sun Nov 27, 2016, 08:37 PM

Nov 2016

I think crosscheck would be a indictment of this election if anyone creditable can show any significant number of people who showed up to vote, but were turned away because of crosscheck. Have not seen that, and doubt that it happened.

I'm not a lawyerly type, just someone tired of every excuse in the world for why we lost, even conspiracy theories ranking right up there with Oswald couldn't have hit Kennedy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can some lawyer type explain to me why the illegal purging of voters by the Crosscheck [View all] s-cubed Nov 2016 OP

Is it even possible to invalidate an election? Don't remember seeing it in the constitution. shraby Nov 2016 #1

Most likely because those in a position to actually do anything about it, won't. catbyte Nov 2016 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author marybourg Nov 2016 #4

Crosscheck goes back years, not something specific to this election. Plus, Hoyt Nov 2016 #3

when I read what happened in North Carolina this year .. JHan Nov 2016 #5