2016 Postmortem

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)

24. Yes it is, you just don't like it

Reply to duffyduff (Reply #20)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 10:36 PM

Nov 2016

Sad

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

86 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Nov 2016 OP

Because he is actually more of a Democrat Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #1

Thanks, Duckhunter. elleng Nov 2016 #4

Not always, but I try Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #15

hmmm sheshe2 Nov 2016 #83

Exactly!!! K&R!!! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2016 #5

It seems like people (normally 4-5 regulars) always post these things to get high view/comment rates TheBlackAdder Nov 2016 #67

Not an answer. duffyduff Nov 2016 #20

Yes it is, you just don't like it Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #24

It's the truth, and it hurts your feelings. duffyduff Nov 2016 #30

And even though I ended up voting for the nominee Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #42

You didn't see much, then. He voted more with Democrats than actual Democrats did. ancianita Nov 2016 #50

Are you trying to stir shit up? babylonsister Nov 2016 #38

Explain liquid diamond Nov 2016 #56

Failed coup? OK-whatever you say. jalan48 Nov 2016 #62

I know, right Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #74

good god Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #71

... sheshe2 Nov 2016 #78

Can you name some? joshcryer Nov 2016 #84

This? Again? TheBlackAdder Nov 2016 #2

Bernie is a member of the Senate Democratic leadershp, so this thread is attacking Larkspur Nov 2016 #3

K&R!!!! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2016 #7

Yeah-no bashing Democrats! jalan48 Nov 2016 #16

He is not a Democrat. However, plenty of Sanders supporters still trash Clinton. n/t duffyduff Nov 2016 #23

You better hope he runs as a Democrat in 2020. jalan48 Nov 2016 #26

Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #32

He votes more with the Democrats Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #29

Still not a Democrat. We ought to be thankful for that. duffyduff Nov 2016 #34

"What's in a name? that which we call a rose. dflprincess Nov 2016 #85

And plenty don't. You're trashing Sanders, so you're doing babylonsister Nov 2016 #41

Tell that to all the people who keep posting threads calling rural Democrats racists NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #36

Yeah-kinda funny how it works that way isn't it? nt jalan48 Nov 2016 #44

I asked a question. liquid diamond Nov 2016 #59

i agree thread should be removed bdamomma Nov 2016 #80

Man, I wish... JSup Nov 2016 #6

I fucking don't. TheLibIn615 Nov 2016 #13

The big tent party tells a popular Senator to "fuck off"? milestogo Nov 2016 #8

Happens often around here. elleng Nov 2016 #49

No kidding. Too damned much infighting around here. This Bernie bashing can go suck it. ancianita Nov 2016 #54

sadly so Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #57

He was not a member of our party! liquid diamond Nov 2016 #68

Our party was lucky to have someone like Bernie run for the nomination milestogo Nov 2016 #79

Bullshit. eom saltpoint Nov 2016 #9

DUH!!! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2016 #10

Did you notice that the primaries were over several months ago? The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2016 #11

I guess to give the appearance of a real primary. jalan48 Nov 2016 #12

We won't make that mistake again. nt MADem Nov 2016 #14

You want more Ralph Naders? jalan48 Nov 2016 #18

What does that even mean? MADem Nov 2016 #40

A third party candidate on the left would sink the Democrat running. jalan48 Nov 2016 #47

A lot happened in 2000. Bush won, five to four. MADem Nov 2016 #51

The ConservaDems just lost to one of the worst Presidential candidates in our history. jalan48 Nov 2016 #69

Wait a minute--we didn't "lose." Our candidate is well north of TWO MILLION votes MADem Nov 2016 #82

Instead we had Nader on the inside this time. Fuck that. Never again. Maru Kitteh Nov 2016 #43

It's not what I want but it's inevitable if the Party leadership doesn't change. jalan48 Nov 2016 #53

Careful what you wish for kacekwl Nov 2016 #45

No, he won't. Have a peep at his birth certificate. MADem Nov 2016 #48

and she is just about the same age Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #60

Plus 1,000 liquid diamond Nov 2016 #72

File the paperwork and pay the fees, you can run. unblock Nov 2016 #17

Excellent question. It should not have been allowed. n/t duffyduff Nov 2016 #19

Please stop these divisive threads. They do nothing for us. I encourage apcalc Nov 2016 #21

Totally agree. tecelote Nov 2016 #58

Having one of the most popular Senators run on your party's ticket is a good thing, I think. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2016 #22

Not if he doesn't actually walk the walk. n/t duffyduff Nov 2016 #25

He walked the Democratic walk better than a lot of alleged Democrats. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2016 #28

He has been walking that walk for decades Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #37

Lame thread. Ace Rothstein Nov 2016 #27

Allowed? FBaggins Nov 2016 #31

Sander's run lead to President Trump...so honestly, it was a bad idea. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #55

actually is was a nominees poor campaining Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #63

One has to wonder... FBaggins Nov 2016 #66

Sorry... that's dishonest spin FBaggins Nov 2016 #64

Because he officially changed to be a Democrat, and therefore is entitled to run as a Democrat. I still_one Nov 2016 #33

Not this shit again. TDale313 Nov 2016 #35

Yep, lol Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #39

. Grassy Knoll Nov 2016 #46

Because THIS: elleng Nov 2016 #52

So... You'd rather him run a 3 way race against HRC and trump as a 3rd party candidate(?) jack_krass Nov 2016 #61

Sanders' run for the nomination ... earthside Nov 2016 #65

So Sanders is Mr Perfect and did no damage? JHan Nov 2016 #77

This message was self-deleted by its author JHan Nov 2016 #81

Yeah, that's what we needed. An even smaller primary field. n/t Azathoth Nov 2016 #70

Because he might have been the best chance to actually win the GE TheCowsCameHome Nov 2016 #73

I would much rather see Bernie Sanders being innaugerated on Jan 20th, than Donald J. Trump. putitinD Nov 2016 #75

Sorry. Have to disagree. Fichefinder Nov 2016 #76

I can critique HRC AND SANDERS and as for Sanders... JHan Nov 2016 #86