Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Agree or disagree with the following statement [View all]TheBlackAdder
(28,684 posts)41. Yep, everybody wants that $5 toaster. That's why Amazon & Wal*Mart are destroying business.
.
I know union guys who are pro-Union to the max, but buy all their shit from Amazon or Chinese resellers because it's cheaper. When I mention that their actions are the very things that drives companies to offshore jobs, they make the case that their purchases are really going to matter, their needs are more important.
Multiple that by 5 million and there's that sucking sound to Mexico, to pay Nabisco workers $3 a day.
.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If this is the first we'd heard of your 2016 candidacy, that's probably just as well.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#8
Yep, everybody wants that $5 toaster. That's why Amazon & Wal*Mart are destroying business.
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2016
#41
That's exactly the case, and why everyone will hate the results of limiting trade
NoGoodNamesLeft
Dec 2016
#42
Trade is a very complicated issue that most people really don't understand fully
NoGoodNamesLeft
Dec 2016
#59
Well, thankfully, almost NO ONE besides HRC sought the nomination. Gee, I wonder why that was?
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#12
You are kidding yourself if you think there wasnt a concerted deck-clearing by the party
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#22
I suspect Warren prefers being a Senator. 14 candidates is not something to aspire to.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#28
And all that would have been a convincing argument, had she actually won the electoral college.
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#29
She was the heavy favorite in 2008, very popular in the party and served the sitting president.
SaschaHM
Dec 2016
#35
I understand, but there have been good arguments made that the "they waited their turn" approach
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#36
Thankfully, the party won't be doing that in 2020 for the folks that ran in 2016.
SaschaHM
Dec 2016
#37
True, and I said many times this past year that no matter what happens, we need to expand our bench
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#40
Nah. You should have to lose twice before you should be encouraged to sit down.
FBaggins
Dec 2016
#16
because he's kind of the candidate equivalent of the Dave Matthews Band?
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#30
None of the 3 candidates who ran in 2016 should think about seeking the 2020 nomination
mtnsnake
Dec 2016
#25
After spending decades bashing the Dem party, including during the primaries.
TwilightZone
Dec 2016
#34
wish I liked O'malley better. He came across as inauthentic to me, but that was the
JCanete
Dec 2016
#46